- Joined
- Apr 8, 2009
- Messages
- 15,112
- Reaction score
- 0
They have one job to do, and it's not that hard. Just get both sides of the story before publishing.Everyone is shitty these days. Journalists are not saints.
They have one job to do, and it's not that hard. Just get both sides of the story before publishing.Everyone is shitty these days. Journalists are not saints.
They have one job to do, and it's not that hard. Just get both sides of the story before publishing.
Why turn this into a personal attack?I think you actually joined the adult workforce you'd find that most people are incompetent at their jobs.
Why turn this into a personal attack?
Why turn this into a personal attack?
Seriously? You're arguing with Rational Poster and wonder why he (she?) turns it into a personal attack? The liberals / communists in this thread turn to personal attacks and vague "no big deal" stuff since they know their media CLEARLY tried to spin the story. So since they have no real grounds upon which to stand and preach they'll start attacking people. Clear as day with @Rational Poster how instead of attacking the media he's now attacking you and trying to call you a child in some manner.
This is really a clear case of shitty and biased journailism but instead of attacking the individual outlets which failed to do their job they'll throw out a vauge "all journalists are shitty" comment. That's pretty hypocritical coming from people who use those same media outlets and stories to constantly and continuously bash Trump.
Why turn this into a personal attack?
Even supposing that's true, does that mean we shouldn't criticize them for their failures?Because your viewpoint seems to come from a lack of experience.
Anyone with real work experience knows about 80% of all workers are incompetent and journalists aren't immune to this.
Because your viewpoint seems to come from a lack of experience.
Anyone with real work experience knows about 80% of all workers are incompetent and journalists aren't immune to this.
Even supposing that's true, does that mean we shouldn't criticize them for their failures?
I mean you can't even make a thread without the mods having to go back and correct your thread titles anymore.
Call out right wing media when they make errors and I might think you actually care about correcting errors in journalism.
Because your viewpoint seems to come from a lack of experience.
Anyone with real work experience knows about 80% of all workers are incompetent and journalists aren't immune to this.
To my knowledge, the mods have never changed any of my thread titles. I have changed them myself every time.
Other than FOX, none of the mainstream media can be reasonably labelled as "right-wing". I think YMMV is the general expectation with sources like Daily Caller and Breitbart, while most people expect the MSM to offer balanced reporting.
80%? Come on, I have managed people my entire adult life and I would say the incompetent number is closer to 20%. 1 in 5 people either are too stupid or just don't care enough to do the job and those people find their way out of any roles under me.
I think the & really depends on the industry. I doubt 80% of doctors are incompetent or 80% of CEO's. Now 80% of McDonalds workers may be but I still doubt that
You never heard the saying 80% of the work is done by 20% of the people?
No, but when the MSM has explosive diarrhea all over the world, yes.
Why turn this into a personal attack?
The left loves their illegals, rapists, drug dealers and murderers.
I don't take it literally. If it was literal it doesn't fit your 80% figure because there is still 20% of the work being done by the 80%
In my office right now two people are playing on their phones (not on break) and a 3rd is browsing the internet while drifting in and out of consciousness.