MMA Guru thinks Anderson Silva's resume is weak and that Anthony Hernandez could accomplish what he did in the same era thoughts.

He's probably right.


Outside of dan henderson and maybe vitor I dont see many other that would give fluffy trouble.
 
He's probably right.


Outside of dan henderson and maybe vitor I dont see many other that would give fluffy trouble.
Bisping?Cardio for days, hard to control and keep down,good striker
Chael and Weidman would be tough too
 
MMAGuru and The Weasel(whom I used to respect and enjoy) have both admitted to never have seen a Chuck Liddell fight live as it was happening (other than Tito 3)

I simply cannot listen to someone’s opinion about this sport and its legends when they were not there for the good old days (and I didn’t even like Chuck) They shouldn’t even have a YouTube channel they get to talk about it on when they don’t know shit. Hindsight is 20/20. This is worse than armchair QBing it’s like…non existent knowledge or something.

Can’t tell me shit
 
We’re comparing God to a Mexican wrestler right nos


Not even a Mexican boxer….not even Cain Velasquez

And here i am making threads like “how would Anderson do against Brock” because Anderson’s fights were just absolutely ridiculous.
We used to get very frustrated trying to get Anderson challenged and he NEVER got beat until he was slowing down at 38 and his technique was so good that losing a bit of speed still didn’t even matter that much. Adesanya could never be at Anderson’s level, ever. Anderson was simply more talented
 
1764103263361.png
Besides #4 and #5, Silva's resume really holds up.

Drop that version of most of them into 2025 and they're still top 10 caliber.

2008 Hendo wouldn't take RDR's head off? lol

2011 TRT Vitor would have nothing for Whittaker?

Even 2010 Chael. Doesn't even have a decent chance of wrestlefucking DDP?

What about Maia vs. Brendan Allen?
 
Hahahah! Unbelievably retarded take.

Anderson randomly jumped up to LHW and clowned on three guys who all popped for PED's in their fight with him.

Did he not watch Kevin Holland of all people making Fluffy fold? I like Fluffy, he's got some good wins but they're not on that level.
I don't remember Irvin or Forrest popping.
 
Hahahah! Unbelievably retarded take.

Anderson randomly jumped up to LHW and clowned on three guys who all popped for PED's in their fight with him.

Did he not watch Kevin Holland of all people making Fluffy fold? I like Fluffy, he's got some good wins but they're not on that level.
Forrest never popped for steroids, Anderson however did.
 




This guy and Lucas Tracy are the epitome of what's wrong with modern mma and the fact this clown calls himself guru especially of mma is lame, this dude was born in the late 90's began paying attention to the UFC solely in like 2015 and thinks that everything that took place before then is irrelevant total dipshit that has no perspective because he wasn't around for the first 2 thirds of the history of mma/nhb. Secondly he trashed any and all of the greats this time Anderson who I am not a big fan of however I can recognize his resume of wins over Franklin, Henderson, Maia, Leites, Belfort, Marquart etc, he takes a shot at Franklin claiming he's weak competition wtf the only reason Franklin wasn't considered an all time great is because of Anderson had he not had to face him you better believe he would have been the number 1 guy in the world, he goes on to say Hernandez could do the very same and more I don't buy this at all and Anthony is having a nice streak right now no doubt I like the wins over Allen, Pereira, Dolidze those are his best at the same time he lost to Holland who I consider average at best so no I don't for one second think that those 3 of his best wins are better than Franklin, Henderson, Maia in their primes I just don't and don't fall for modern UFC hype either like Ronda Rousey was a once in a life time athlete.

Finally social media is a cancer it allows anyone who has wifi to sign up for a YT account or X whatever it may be and spew nonsense with no accountability hell they don't even have to be fact checked and these people are being put on the same level as actors and real legit analysts who actually have credentials and built their reputation for years, they also had to undergo some kind of training whether it be journalism, film school or like in Pride you had Bas and Stephen as commentators who were real and legit not fukking annoying youtubers like Tracey and I don't want to call him guru because he is the furthest thing from one at least those two(Bas, Stephen) had some credibility where as nowadays social media dipshits have absurd influence it's freaking sad these guys make Ariel look amazing again can't express my hate for these assholes.

While it is a bad take, using the Holland fight to discredit Fluffy is also a stupid take. Hernandez was 27 when he lost to Holland, thats like using the Takase and Chonan fights against Silva.

Lets see how Fluffy's career turns out before we shit on him. I have a feeling he will be champion, although I doubt his title defenses will come close to Anderson lol.
 
View attachment 1123134
Besides #4 and #5, Silva's resume really holds up.

Drop that version of most of them into 2025 and they're still top 10 caliber.

2008 Hendo wouldn't take RDR's head off? lol

2011 TRT Vitor would have nothing for Whittaker?

Even 2010 Chael. Doesn't even have a decent chance of wrestlefucking DDP?

What about Maia vs. Brendan Allen?

I'd say even Leites holds up well. He returned to the UFC when MW was as good as it ever was, and was a ranked MW. He even took Bisping to a SD, and Bisping went on to win the title less than a year later. He has a win over Marquardt too, but Nate was deducted 2 points in that fight.

Vitor started TRT a little while after the Anderson fight, but he also joined Blackzilians and Hooft in 2012, when he realized he could kick. Anderson didn't fight that peak 2013 version, but 2011 Vitor would still do a number on a lot of the current division.

As far as MMA Guru, didn't he start following MMA in the last few years? COVID-19 era fan? I don't think he even knew what MMA was when Anderson was in his prime.
 
Last edited:




This guy and Lucas Tracy are the epitome of what's wrong with modern mma and the fact this clown calls himself guru especially of mma is lame, this dude was born in the late 90's began paying attention to the UFC solely in like 2015 and thinks that everything that took place before then is irrelevant total dipshit that has no perspective because he wasn't around for the first 2 thirds of the history of mma/nhb. Secondly he trashed any and all of the greats this time Anderson who I am not a big fan of however I can recognize his resume of wins over Franklin, Henderson, Maia, Leites, Belfort, Marquart etc, he takes a shot at Franklin claiming he's weak competition wtf the only reason Franklin wasn't considered an all time great is because of Anderson had he not had to face him you better believe he would have been the number 1 guy in the world, he goes on to say Hernandez could do the very same and more I don't buy this at all and Anthony is having a nice streak right now no doubt I like the wins over Allen, Pereira, Dolidze those are his best at the same time he lost to Holland who I consider average at best so no I don't for one second think that those 3 of his best wins are better than Franklin, Henderson, Maia in their primes I just don't and don't fall for modern UFC hype either like Ronda Rousey was a once in a life time athlete.

Finally social media is a cancer it allows anyone who has wifi to sign up for a YT account or X whatever it may be and spew nonsense with no accountability hell they don't even have to be fact checked and these people are being put on the same level as actors and real legit analysts who actually have credentials and built their reputation for years, they also had to undergo some kind of training whether it be journalism, film school or like in Pride you had Bas and Stephen as commentators who were real and legit not fukking annoying youtubers like Tracey and I don't want to call him guru because he is the furthest thing from one at least those two(Bas, Stephen) had some credibility where as nowadays social media dipshits have absurd influence it's freaking sad these guys make Ariel look amazing again can't express my hate for these assholes.

MMA Guru is just a below sub par analyst that takes conversations and “ interviews “ if you want to call it that with people that make him look smarter.
His opinion of fighters is only “ the good one” when someone who is in the interview is making a complete ass of themselves or providing such a one sided biased opinion of a fighter that his input seems just reasonable…. Not even good.. just better then the other person talking.
I don’t like his input.. It’s irritating to listen too. His wrestling commentary.. I start losing IQ PTS if I listen longer then 30 seconds and he often gushes over MMA Fighters who give him credible praise and acknowledgment in his videos. Clearly a striker fan mentality but it favours the new age of MMA. I mean.. he think O’Malley is the greatest Bantamweight striker ever like it the division just started existing. He never really gives credit to the prior fighters. I noticed that because he only speaks in detail about the fighters downfall. Never really there success. Aside from Dan Henderson. So him picking apart Anderson Silva’s resume is not surprising. For the ones that watched Silva’s career it wasn’t ever the opponent credentials discredited. it was how easy he dismantled the opponent with the credential they had.
I’m kinda hoping he gets caught in some TMZ scandal or something but it’s doubtful Gurus going anywhere anytime soon.
 
Back
Top