- Joined
- Jun 1, 2002
- Messages
- 20,253
- Reaction score
- 10,371
Apparently they couldn't proceed with a criminal case because of the fact Mcgregor claimed they had consensual rough sex so even with his dna inside her, proving that it was rape would be difficult because of his claim it was rough sex. They also said that because she was drunk and had cocaine in her system and couldn't remember having sex with Conors friend also made her lose credibility it seems. Not word for word ofc but that's pretty much what the DPP told her. The statement is posted online somewhere
So the woman consensually was beat up and had left her tampon on while getting it shoved into her so deep that it had to be removed with a forcep, to show up shaking, crying, and traumatized at a hospital. And Conor saying it was consensual made it "hard to prove" that it was rape?
I might be not that old, but I have never heard a more ridiculous justification for letting a person off a criminal charge. It's not only baffling, it's infuriating, and an insult to human intelligence.
The doctor's report said he had never seen anything like that, when asked if this could have been consensual.
This is plain horseshit. This is corruption beyond measure. The judge who dismissed this as a criminal case ought to be investigated, to say the least. We are talking about the scum of the Earth.
Last edited: