Crime Mango Molester's sentencing

[idrankyourbeer]

Imagine cheering on a weaponized justice system. All of these cases were just an attempt to prevent Trump from being elected.

well, you got the election interference part right with this case. unfortunately it was the mandarin molester who committed it. that's why they were able to bump his 34 misdemeanor charges up to felonies.

 

[Islam Imamate]

Garland has shown his leanings, dancing around as though he's not aligned more closely with very anti Trump people by calling him a moderate is fluff.

How so? Can you cite a statement of his suggesting as much?

Yes, I can be flippant because I'm able to connect very plain dots. There's a difference between an opinion and an assertion. I'm going to assume you know that. My view is that given those involved, it's likely there's at least some level of political motivation. I'm not claiming I know it for sure. I'm saying to me it's likely given how politics tend to work. You can disagree, but we both know an acting AG isn't going to spout something partisan in a situation like this regardless of whether he has any political motivations or not.

Your opinion here is an assertion, namely an assertion that the charges brought against Trump are political. Of course as you you yourself admitted its not based on any tangible evidence, just a gut feeling from someone who is completely unaware of all the relevant facts of the matter.

Again you realize just that because something might be politically motivated doesn't mean that it necessarily is right? And that to make the case that it is in fact politically motivated you would need some, evidence to suggest as much of which you have none here.

I think its weird that you don't understand how someone else might assign political motivations. I don't "expect" you to cede anything.

Oh I understand why they would but in this case not for any good reason all things considered.

 

[Islam Imamate]

Why in the actual fuck would you be content to accept that you live in a nation where you can evade prosecution for crimes for which you are clearly guilty just by running for office?

At then end of the day their dislike for the left and liberals is what tempers their ability to criticize Trump or concede to Trump's critics in regards to the crimes he clearly committed out in the open. He will admit that he has no idea at all what he's talking about in regards to the case but then acts indignant when you don't take his baseless assertion for granted.

 

[mkess101]

How so? Can you cite a statement of his suggesting as much?

Your opinion here is an assertion, namely an assertion that the charges brought against Trump are political. Of course as you you yourself admitted its not based on any tangible evidence, just a gut feeling from someone who is completely unaware of all the relevant facts of the matter.

Again you realize just that because something might be politically motivated doesn't mean that it necessarily is right? And that to make the case that it is in fact politically motivated you would need some, evidence to suggest as much of which you have none here.

Oh I understand why they would but in this case not for any good reason all things considered.

Well AG is an appointed position and I'm pretty sure he wasn't appointed by Dems. Makes sense they're not appointing a big Trumper as the highest LE officer in the country LOL. He showed his leanings enough prior to his appointment that it was the Dems who wanted him there.

No my opinion is just that. My opinion. An assertion implies a confidence that something is absolutely true. My view (that I've stated numerous times) is that i believe it, and nothing more. I'm not trying to "make a case". I gave my opinion.

Your argument boils down to: it's absurd that lacking irrefutable evidence anyone would believe that political rivals would use the courts to go after someone they hate!

Like...what LOL?

 

[Andy Capp]

It has nothing to do with "contentness". It has to do with what's actually achievable. I can't stand Trump, I'll be glad when he's gone. But he's here, my life goes on, and rehashing the shit from 2020 isn't gonna remove him from office.

How have things worked out for the Dems as of now with the course they've charted? Trump will be gone in 4 years, dead not long after most likely. He's not the first nor will he be the last to evade prosecution for crimes he likely committed. My point is that it probably makes more sense to focus on shit they can control than keep railing out that he got away with it.

*contentedness

 

[mkess101]

At then end of the day their dislike for the left and liberals is what tempers their ability to criticize Trump or concede to Trump's critics in regards to the crimes he clearly committed out in the open. He will admit that he has no idea at all what he's talking about in regards to the case but then acts indignant when you don't take his baseless assertion for granted.

Because whether he did it and whether there were political motivations for some involved to go after him are 2 different things. It's convenient for you to conflate them so you can be dismissive of course.

 

[mkess101]

*contentedness

Yes, thanks.

 

[Islam Imamate]

Well AG is an appointed position and I'm pretty sure he wasn't appointed by Dems. Makes sense they're not appointing a big Trumper as the highest LE officer in the country LOL. He showed his leanings enough prior to his appointment that it was the Dems who wanted him there.

Dems wanted him there because he was seen a moderate beforehand. If the mere fact that he was appointed by a Dem suggests to you he was politically motivated then presumably in your eyes there can be no non-partisan enforcement of law against politicians as the DOJ is always headed by an appointee of the POTUS.

I guess Bob Menendez' prosecution was also political in your eyes?

No my opinion is just that. My opinion. An assertion implies a confidence that something is absolutely true. My view (that I've stated numerous times) is that i believe it, and nothing more. I'm not trying to "make a case". I gave my opinion.

For the record, an opinion based on no evidence by someone who admitted to being ignorant of the facts of the matter.

Your argument boils down to: it's absurd that lacking irrefutable evidence anyone would believe that political rivals would use the courts to go after someone they hate!

Like...what LOL?

To be clear its not that you haven't cited irrefutable evidence, it's that you haven't cited any evidence at all.

In other words, "Just trust me bro"

 

[Islam Imamate]

Because whether he did it and whether there were political motivations for some involved to go after him are 2 different things. It's convenient for you to conflate them so you can be dismissive of course.

Again just because something might be politically motivated doesn't mean it necessarily is, you understand that right?

 

[mkess101]

Dems wanted him there because he was seen a moderate beforehand. If the mere fact that he was appointed by a Dem suggests to you he was politically motivated then presumably in your eyes there can be no non-partisan enforcement of law against politicians as the DOJ is always headed by an appointee of the POTUS.

I guess Bob Menendez' prosecution was also political in your eyes?

For the record, an opinion based on no evidence by someone who admitted to being ignorant of the facts of the matter.

To be clear its not that you haven't cited irrefutable evidence, it's that you haven't cited any evidence at all.

In other words, "Just trust me bro"

No, just trust the history of politics and human nature. Or don't! I'm not asking you (or anyone for that matter) to believe it.

Have you ever watched a true crime show where it's not solved and there's not evidence to charge someone...but you still think they likely did it? Be it circumstances, the vibe they gave...whatever.

When I was in college, I had 3 roommates my sophomore year. My one roommate Tommy had a buddy named Jake that would be over at our place all the time, come out with us, etc. So late in the year Tommy and my other roommate Jeff started not getting along great. Can't remember why, doesn't matter but Jake was around and knew it. Anyway, one weekend we had a party and Jeff wasn't there and someone pissed on his bed. Nobody (that I know) saw it happen and of course everyone denied it. There was no evidence at all about who did it. But we all really got the feeling that it was Jake. We couldn't prove it and didn't try. We knew he'd never admit it. We weren't 100% positive of course, but we thought he did.

Was it preposterous for us to think that sans any evidence? We didn't try to hold him accountable for something we could never prove. We didn't even confront him really. We just, thought that of the ~25 people there, it was likely him. By your logic, we were what? Absurd for voicing to each other our thoughts on Jake?

 

[Islam Imamate]

No, just trust the history of politics and human nature. Or don't! I'm not asking you (or anyone for that matter) to believe it.

Have you ever watched a true crime show where it's not solved and there's not evidence to charge someone...but you still think they likely did it? Be it circumstances, the vibe they gave...whatever.

When I was in college, I had 3 roommates my sophomore year. My one roommate Tommy had a buddy named Jake that would be over at our place all the time, come out with us, etc. So late in the year Tommy and my other roommate Jeff started not getting along great. Can't remember why, doesn't matter but Jake was around and knew it. Anyway, one weekend we had a party and Jeff wasn't there and someone pissed on his bed. Nobody (that I know) saw it happen and of course everyone denied it. There was no evidence at all about who did it. But we all really got the feeling that it was Jake. We couldn't prove it and didn't try. We knew he'd never admit it. We weren't 100% positive of course, but we thought he did.

Was it preposterous for us to think that sans any evidence? We didn't try to hold him accountable for something we could never prove. We didn't even confront him really. We just, thought that of the ~25 people there, it was likely him. By your logic, we were what? Absurd for voicing to each other our thoughts on Jake?

Before we continue, can you acknowledge this?

Again just because something might be politically motivated doesn't mean it necessarily is, you understand that right?

 

[idrankyourbeer]

Dems wanted him there because he was seen a moderate beforehand. If the mere fact that he was appointed by a Dem suggests to you he was politically motivated then presumably in your eyes there can be no non-partisan enforcement of law against politicians as the DOJ is always headed by an appointee of the POTUS.

but zesto molesto was going to appoint that child fucker as the AG but i'm sure there was nothing politically motivated behind that.

 

[mkess101]

Before we continue, can you acknowledge this?

Of course. I never denied that at all. I'd actually say that phrase is a pretty good reason why that while I think this Trump situation likely is, I'd never say that I flat out KNOW it is. Because I don't KNOW. In my eyes it seems to be, at least in part. That's as far as I'll go. Which I've said all along.

 

[mkess101]

but zesto molesto was going to appoint that child fucker as the AG but i'm sure there was nothing politically motivated behind that.

Most things done in national politics have at least some level of political motivation. That's kinda my point LOL.

 

[Scerpi]

Dems wanted him there because he was seen a moderate beforehand. If the mere fact that he was appointed by a Dem suggests to you he was politically motivated then presumably in your eyes there can be no non-partisan enforcement of law against politicians as the DOJ is always headed by an appointee of the POTUS.

I guess Bob Menendez' prosecution was also political in your eyes?

For the record, an opinion based on no evidence by someone who admitted to being ignorant of the facts of the matter.

To be clear its not that you haven't cited irrefutable evidence, it's that you haven't cited any evidence at all.

In other words, "Just trust me bro"

Garland is a retard... And Biden's lap dog







Meanwhile...





Fuck him

 

[Andy Capp]

Funny that you don't realize you're the cloud in this metaphor. Well done, air head.

 

[Andy Capp]

It has nothing to do with "contentness". It has to do with what's actually achievable. I can't stand Trump, I'll be glad when he's gone. But he's here, my life goes on, and rehashing the shit from 2020 isn't gonna remove him from office.

How have things worked out for the Dems as of now with the course they've charted? Trump will be gone in 4 years, dead not long after most likely. He's not the first nor will he be the last to evade prosecution for crimes he likely committed. My point is that it probably makes more sense to focus on shit they can control than keep railing out that he got away with it.

Bending over and taking it in the ass is not the way to win the next election.

 

[Kingz]

They’ll stand for now but the sentencing being done means the appeals process can finally start.

Seeing as Bragg pulled the entire case out of his ass while quite literally making up laws..:the convictions will be reversed in the next couple of years if not within the year.

It would be quicker but it will probably atleast have to reach the NY supreme court first since NY appeals courts are a DEI mosh pit. A couple years if it has to go to the US Supreme Court.

So the media should use their “convicted felon” descriptors while they still can without being sued.

Not like any of this matters anymore. Trump has achieved total victory over the democrats, the media, and their lawfare.

Call him what you want. His election days are over and he’s President.

It’s been entertaining watching democrats scramble for purpose and will for “resistance” since the GOAT vanquished their coconut queen. But the base is so defeated by MAGA.

 

[BFoe]

Almost every President over the last century was a war criminal. I hope future generations are smart enough to not care about him paying off a porn star or whatever the fuck. I hope they're also smart enough to see that all of this nonsense was very obviously motivated by politics.

Well, it wasn’t. It was not “motivated by politics.” There’s unequivocal evidence that Trump was part of a multi-state criminal scheme to submit fraudulent electors and disenfranchise thousands of American voters. That’s not,”nonsense,” that’s a coup attempt.

There’s mountains of evidence that he intended to violently disrupt certification of the election on Jan 6 when his fake elector scheme failed. Again, that’s not nonsense, that’s a coup attempt.
There’s unequivocal evidence that he purposely and willfully stole boxes and boxes of classified documents, lied about having it, tried to hide it from the government so they couldn’t get it back, and solicited staffers to commit those same crimes. That’s not nonsense, and it’s vastly different that Pence or Biden unintentionally having a couple of pieces of paper in the garage or whatever.

Former Dem VP candidate John Edwards was charged with the same falsifying business records and tax fraud that Trump was, and for the same reason (he was covering up an affair he had while cheating on his cancer-stricken wife, much like Trump covered up his cheating on his pregnant wife). And Edwards wasn’t even convicted like Trump was, it was a hung jury and the DOJ (his charges were federal rather than state) opted not to re-file.
—But to us on the left, that POS was persona non grata just for the cheating on his cancer-stricken wife part, let alone the other shit. His political career was done, dead, and over. You guys would’ve been wise to do the same to Trumo.

 

[BFoe]

Gosh, how embarrassing. So he still can't own a firearm? The way he and his buttboy spaceman are going in on Starmer and the UK government and him still owing $300,000 to the British High Court when he tried suing and failed about the golden showers thing he may be refused entry as a convicted felon. That would be funny.

/Cue the TDSers why would he want to go to that shithole country anyway Moronica Mob.

It’s embarrassing AF, I agree. Our president-elect has a sentencing hearing for felony convictions 10 days before his inauguration. Trump voters make it embarrassing to be an American. Hopefully people in other countries know we aren’t all like that.