The speed difference is massive, if you can't see it then I don't know what to tell you. rumble is very wild and looping with boxing, there's a lot of extensions and pull on his punches. They're fast but there's a lot less snap to it. Woodley boxing on other hand is a lot better and way more snappy, his punches are tighter, shorter, more compact and he can put up combinations a lot better than rumble due to his form.Woodley doesn't hit anything like Rumble, not in the same ballpark, and I think you're greatly overblowing the speed difference. Rumble is extremely fast and explosive, and his striking is rangier and a lot more unpredictable than Woodley, who relies predominantly on one weapon and a great understanding of timing and range. Woodley wouldn't be able to stand with Rumble and he wouldn't have any chance to score takedowns.
Rumble is a scary-powerful fighter but he's not technically sound at all. Woodley is better than rumble at pretty much everything other than power and pure strength.
Last edited: