- Joined
- Mar 18, 2014
- Messages
- 20,345
- Reaction score
- 13,692
SketchyYes, her father was rumored to be an agent for Mossad. Or a double/triple agent.
He met a suspicious death too. Fell off of his yacht, which was named Ghislane.
SketchyYes, her father was rumored to be an agent for Mossad. Or a double/triple agent.
He met a suspicious death too. Fell off of his yacht, which was named Ghislane.
I'm just not sure what sort of clarity anyone would expect to gain from interviewing her. Is she allowing access, and if she is, would she ever answer any meaningful question honestly? How many would even want to do the job of interviewing her? It's a closed case: she's guilty of what she's guilty of, and that's that,I'm far from a conspiracy theorist and usually dismiss most of them until something comes out. But obviously you have logs of visitors cooberating her testimony etc. They're the girls who were involved etc. Im guessing because it's a pending appeal that her lawyer would not allow any discussions at this time. But I would also think there could be a deal struck if it leads to solid and concrete evidence. I don't believe everyone that hung around with him had sex with underage girls of course. So that all has to be sorted through.
Whether or not she would provide meaningful information is one question, but this is the biggestI'm just not sure what sort of clarity anyone would expect to gain from interviewing her. Is she allowing access, and if she is, would she ever answer any meaningful question honestly? How many would even want to do the job of interviewing her? It's a closed case: she's guilty of what she's guilty of, and that's that,
So she doesnt do 20 years? That's why she would imo.... only to cut a deal. There is no early release for federal crimes I don't think. She will be 83-84 when she gets out. So may die in prison..a deal would work imo.I'm just not sure what sort of clarity anyone would expect to gain from interviewing her. Is she allowing access, and if she is, would she ever answer any meaningful question honestly? How many would even want to do the job of interviewing her? It's a closed case: she's guilty of what she's guilty of, and that's that,
You lost me at CNNCNN —
In 2023, Dan Bongino, star podcaster, demanded to know: “What the hell are they hiding with Jeffrey Epstein?” In 2025, Dan Bongino, FBI deputy director, disappointed the 2023 version of himself. “I have reviewed the case. Jeffrey Epstein killed himself,” he wrote Sunday in an X post. Bongino was flooded with replies, many of the accusatory variety, from people who refuse to believe him...
Bongino’s contentious post on X came after he and his boss, FBI director Kash Patel, appeared on Maria Bartiromo’s Fox News show...
But the two men also repeatedly tried to tamp down expectations about future revelations. And in a couple of cases they tried to deflate conspiratorial claims that have propped up and united Trump’s base...
Numerous MAGA media influencers have argued that the government is covering up information about last year’s Trump assassination attempts, for example. Bongino tried to let those people down easy. When Bartiromo asked about the cases, he let out a sigh, then emphasized that he had personally reviewed all the evidence. “I’m not going to tell people what they want to hear. I’m going to tell you the truth,” he said. “And whether you like it or not is up to you. If there was a big explosive ‘there’ there… we would have told you.”
He is!That Bongino dude looks like a villain.
I don't see why the government would want to cut her any kind of deal. It seems like a thoroughly closed case. The reason it occasionally gets talked about is because the same people who think Hillary Clinton ate children in Satanic rituals also think the DNC did Epstein in, or something.So she doesnt do 20 years? That's why she would imo.... only to cut a deal. There is no early release for federal crimes I don't think. She will be 83-84 when she gets out. So may die in prison..a deal would work imo.
I think its because the associated people were mostly high profile. Prince Andrew def was and appears guilty. He was never charged but paid out the girl. Could be hes the only person of significance with anyone else being regular folks. But these things produce suspicion. If Trump could prove members of the DNC then he would have. Same with Biden on Trump. So those two seem unlikely.I don't see why the government would want to cut her any kind of deal. It seems like a thoroughly closed case. The reason it occasionally gets talked about is because the same people who think Hillary Clinton ate children in Satanic rituals also think the DNC did Epstein in, or something.
It's the opposite. There are so many powerful people involved from multiple governments across the world and from both parties that nobody wants to release it because it destroys everybody.I think its because the associated people were mostly high profile. Prince Andrew def was and appears guilty. He was never charged but paid out the girl. Could be hes the only person of significance with anyone else being regular folks. But these things produce suspicion. If Trump could prove members of the DNC then he would have. Same with Biden on Trump. So those two seem unlikely.