- Joined
- Aug 1, 2022
- Messages
- 1,264
- Reaction score
- 2,255
This is only half true though. That's were the problem with tournaments like this lies.Dq’ing someone who isn’t engaging in combat in a combat sport is a good decision.
If you dont want to get taken down or do jiu jitsu then you shouldnt sign up for a jiu jitsu competition.
Jesse did engage. He worked on getting grips and tried several footsweeps. He just stood up when his opponent pulled guard, which makes perfect sense, as his opponent would not do that if it wasn't a position he considered advantageous in the first place.
You should not want to get taken down. Nobody is bothered by the chance of getting taken down in a BJJ tournament. Neither was Jesse.
He was bothered not by the chance, but by the actual takedown. That's what the problem is. In a fair competition obviously either party could get taken down.
The issue pointed out here is that under some rulesets sitting down is incentivised. Which is quite literally bypassing the scoring system as a takedown scores. Just as a sweep does, which you also can't do standing vs a grounded opponent.
So the guy who sits down actually gains an advantage over the other regarding scoring while at the same the criteria itself implies that being taken down is a bad thing, as it scores for the other.
It just makes little sense that way. Either a takedown scores, or it doesn't. But if it does, you can't allow someone to take themselves down just so they don't get scored on.
I actually find the video pretty well intended. The title may be a bit clickbaity, but his critique isn't aimed against BJJ itself but against the incentives set by competition rules.
He goes as far as complaining in similar fashion about the Karate ruleset these days, where a guy was able to win Olympic gold by getting knocked out.
Last edited: