Elections Kamala Harris picks Minnesota governor Tim Walz as VP running mate

Do you like this pick for VP?


  • Total voters
    206
Then I told them I would put a policy on website two days before the election.

president-reagan-and-members-of-his-staff-including-vice-v0-qjjz5h5m4epc1.jpeg
 
I think I understand you now.

On one side we have the uni party, media lackeys, warmongers and career politicians.

Then on the maga side we have the super rich, the Joe six pack diaper people and ammo sexuals.

You think Trump is the smart man's choice.

Will you storm the capital when Trump looses to Kamala?
I think anyone who unironically and with no quotation marks uses "uniparty" is pretty much just saying that they have no idea about what goes on in American governance.
 
I hold it against him because I personally think that despite how normalized it is, its one of the worst and most irresponsible things a person can do in their day to day life. That said I am in the minority on this point and I suspect most Americans, especially the part of the base Walz is trying to pick up, won't care.

Apparently the last few presidents have all been teetotalers and Kamala would be the first to not be one in a while. I prefer a teetotaler POTUS but again I suspect I am in the minority on that.
100% agree
 






What a hero


Yeah he clearly wanted to mislead people but was careful not to technically lie in case he got called out on it.

I'd actually respect him more it more if he just flat out lied, it had the same intention as just flat out lying but is more cowardly as he leaves himself a way to weasel out of it.
 
I hold it against him because I personally think that despite how normalized it is, its one of the worst and most irresponsible things a person can do in their day to day life. That said I am in the minority on this point and I suspect most Americans, especially the part of the base Walz is trying to pick up, won't care.

Apparently the last few presidents have all been teetotalers and Kamala would be the first to not be one in a while. I prefer a teetotaler POTUS but again I suspect I am in the minority on that.

Agreed. There are also degrees of how bad a DUI is. Not justifying any DUI but there is a hell of a difference between someone a bit over the limit who drives 10 miles below the limit (as they probably mistakenly think the slower speed will be enough to compensate for their delay in reaction speed) and someone who does 96 in a 55mph zone. Not sure if there are any studies done on it but I'd imagine the odds of a fatality go up exponentially the more above the speed limit you are since you are compounding slower reaction speed with much less time to react to the unexpected.
 
I think it would be a big deal if it were recent or if there was some sign he continued the behaviour. But people should be allowed the opportunity to atone for mistakes and it seems to me he's done that with a life of public service since that incident.
Its not disqualifying to be sure and I do agree it was a long time ago and it doesn't seem like it became a reoccurring problem so he should be allowed to move past it. Just saying that personally I don't excuse DUIs as quickly as others do.
 
while the latter is almost certainly the case, they’re def not piling onto the smear for free, unless they are absolute morons. not that they could sell themselves/their smear ammo for anything substantial, but they could easily leverage for a quick buck in exchange for being the smear ambassadors
Oh piss off. I’m a vet. I served in the gulf. So if I say I shot bin Laden that’s not stolen valor? Or if I said I was a front line commander?
 
Yes, you are being nit picky
if you could just form an intelligent response I would have something to respond to. as it is I don't think you can tell the difference between drunk driving and drunk driving while recklessly going nearly double the speed limit.

I'm guessing you have recently lost your ability to think and make distinctions because of partisan blindness. I think you think you are defending walz (who i support with resounding vigor and think is the best politician in the entire country) out of partisan dishonesty and hatred.
 
Agreed. There are also degrees of how bad a DUI is. Not justifying any DUI but there is a hell of a difference between someone a bit over the limit who drives 10 miles below the limit (as they probably mistakenly think the slower speed will be enough to compensate for their delay in reaction speed) and someone who does 96 in a 55mph zone. Not sure if there are any studies done on it but I'd imagine the odds of a fatality go up exponentially the more above the speed limit you are since you are compounding slower reaction speed with much less time to react to the unexpected.
@emefer
 
if you could just form an intelligent response I would have something to respond to. as it is I don't think you can tell the difference between drunk driving and drunk driving while recklessly going nearly double the speed limit.

I'm guessing you have recently lost your ability to think and make distinctions because of partisan blindness. I think you think you are defending walz (who i support with resounding vigor and think is the best politician in the entire country) out of partisan dishonesty and hatred.
I said they are both drunk driving. You are nitpicking about differences and then saying I’m nitpicking.
 
Did that make sense in your head before you hit "post reply"? Look, you've already said that you find it appalling to raise kids to eventually be parents themselves, and that if you ever find someone to have sex with you, you'd focus on raising kids to be consumers and employees, so we already know what kind of piece of shit you are. Not much conversation to be had after you admit to being a truly immoral hunk of shit.
LOL! Where did I do this? This is a really strange thing to be pulling out of your ass.

Is this the kind of thing you imagine when you think about other posters? It's really weird, like JD Vance weird.
 
That last clip is absurd. You got back from Vicenza Italy and want to talk like you know what someone coming back from Afghanistan or Iraq deals with. Or want to complain that you didn’t get support services? Wow.
Front lines of Olive Garden
 
LOL! Where did I do this? This is a really strange thing to be pulling out of your ass.

Is this the kind of thing you imagine when you think about other posters? It's really weird, like JD Vance weird.
Do you have amnesia? This was just a couple months ago in the Harrison Butker thread where you tried to be a white knight by calling everybody a "creep" who suggests raising kids to eventually be parents themselves. You didn't like the answer, so you kept responding with "why are you scared to answer" because we both know you were really just looking for an opening to give some atheism monologue you heard somewhere else, and I didn't need "the good book" to make the argument that kids should be raised to eventually be parents themselves.



 
Do you have amnesia? This was just a couple months ago in the Harrison Butker thread where you tried to be a white knight by calling everybody a "creep" who suggests raising kids to eventually be parents themselves. You didn't like the answer, so you kept responding with "why are you scared to answer" because we both know you were really just looking for an opening to give some atheism monologue you heard somewhere else, and I didn't need "the good book" to make the argument that kids should be raised to eventually be parents themselves.



So you now want god in the bedroom? Why do you creeps worry so much about other people do in private? You post about the imagined love life of other posters. It's just strange. You must be lonely AF.
 
I said they are both drunk driving. You are nitpicking about differences and then saying I’m nitpicking.
No, you contradicted my original point where I was making an accurate important distinction between driving 96 mph while drunk!! and driving carefully and slowly in back roads. No sane person would possibly ever try to make the argument that they are the same thing. But you did.

You did that because you thought I was trying to make Walz look bad because you thought I was against him and now you have found that out you're wrong and you're just going to double down on a really idiotic point to save face.

If this isn't true then you have one recourse which is to make your argument that drunk driving slowly and carefully on back roads is the same as driving 96 mph while drunk.

But if you do that, you're going to look a fool and so you'll obfuscate and lie instead.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top