- Joined
- Mar 30, 2023
- Messages
- 6,221
- Reaction score
- 12,327
Pretty?
She's a 10 for the WNBA
Pretty?
Women can't bear it when other women are more popular and attractive than them so they try to tear them apart. They will never admit that that's what they are doing so they have to come up with some bullshit reasons to justify their jealousy.
This is nothing new.
I actually once told him to stop posting selfies on sherdog. This is a karate forum, not Grinder.Just ask my little cajun poofter @Poirierfan , he'll help you set up that account sir lol.
I actually once told him to stop posting selfies on sherdog. This is a karate forum, not Grinder.
I don’t know about most of your questions.
But I would like to discuss appeal.
Of course she’s not a stunning beauty. But to guys who are into that league, she becomes the ultimate woman.
There are so many WMMA fighters that were average looking or less, but guys on Sherdog acted like they were raving beauties.
Sorry fellas, but prime dolled up versions of Gina Carano, Meisha Tate, Michelle Waterson, and other female fighters wouldn’t even get a 2nd glance on a trendy street in NY or LA. Those girls are only hot to MMA fans.
I would definitely glance twice to prime Gina. She has that Southern European, or Italian look that I like. That look is actually not that common even in NYC.I don’t know about most of your questions.
But I would like to discuss appeal.
Of course she’s not a stunning beauty. But to guys who are into that league, she becomes the ultimate woman.
There are so many WMMA fighters that were average looking or less, but guys on Sherdog acted like they were raving beauties.
Sorry fellas, but prime dolled up versions of Gina Carano, Meisha Tate, Michelle Waterson, and other female fighters wouldn’t even get a 2nd glance on a trendy street in NY or LA. Those girls are only hot to MMA fans.
No, she's not. She's not a 10 anywhere.She's a 10 for the WNBA
That's not what the CC thing is about though. The issue that underpins is that, to some people, she's not good enough to warrant the attention that she's getting. And that there are more talented female college players and definitely WNBA players who the media are ignoring. And they're being ignored because CC is more marketable. And, let's not bs ourselves, part of why she's more marketable is because she matches the largest potential consumer demographic in the country.Women can't bear it when other women are more popular and attractive than them so they try to tear them apart. They will never admit that that's what they are doing so they have to come up with some bullshit reasons to justify their jealousy.
This is nothing new.
Are these more talented women breaking men's shooting records?That's not what the CC thing is about though. The issue that underpins is that, to some people, she's not good enough to warrant the attention that she's getting. And that there are more talented female college players and definitely WNBA players who the media are ignoring. And they're being ignored because CC is more marketable. And, let's not bs ourselves, part of why she's more marketable is because she matches the largest potential consumer demographic in the country.
They're right and they're wrong.
IMO, CC deserves attention because she's really good and she's got the college scoring record to prove it. But she's not the first really talented female player to come out in recent years and, in terms of accomplishments, CC hasn't done as much winning as others have. However, the college media space definitely pitted her image as a decent looking and talented white basketball player vs. the image of the LSU team from last year that was predominantly black and, in particular, juxtaposed her vs. Angel Reese.
That's where the whole "It's because she's white..." thing started. College media used less flattering language to describe the LSU team, sometimes even implying negative things about them while glorifying CC. After LSU beat CC's team, the media again criticized the LSU players for un-ladylike conduct while ignoring that CC is an avid trash talker herself.
The good vs. evil imagery that the media was utilizing is why CC is catching the backlash that she's getting.
She didn't create it but she's definitely benefitting from it when it comes to marketing. And for the black women, in college and in the WNBA, being used as the evil foil to Caitlin Clark's ascendancy strikes them as unfair.
Try to cope a little harder. They don't have to try.They’re trying so hard to make people care about women’s sports lol.
That's not what the CC thing is about though. The issue that underpins is that, to some people, she's not good enough to warrant the attention that she's getting. And that there are more talented female college players and definitely WNBA players who the media are ignoring. And they're being ignored because CC is more marketable. And, let's not bs ourselves, part of why she's more marketable is because she matches the largest potential consumer demographic in the country.
They're right and they're wrong.
IMO, CC deserves attention because she's really good and she's got the college scoring record to prove it. But she's not the first really talented female player to come out in recent years and, in terms of accomplishments, CC hasn't done as much winning as others have. However, the college media space definitely pitted her image as a decent looking and talented white basketball player vs. the image of the LSU team from last year that was predominantly black and, in particular, juxtaposed her vs. Angel Reese.
That's where the whole "It's because she's white..." thing started. College media used less flattering language to describe the LSU team, sometimes even implying negative things about them while glorifying CC. After LSU beat CC's team, the media again criticized the LSU players for un-ladylike conduct while ignoring that CC is an avid trash talker herself.
The good vs. evil imagery that the media was utilizing is why CC is catching the backlash that she's getting.
She didn't create it but she's definitely benefitting from it when it comes to marketing. And for the black women, in college and in the WNBA, being used as the evil foil to Caitlin Clark's ascendancy strikes them as unfair.
That's why I said "IMO, CC deserves attention because she's really good and she's got the college scoring record to prove it."Are these more talented women breaking men's shooting records?
How is your troll arse not banned already? GTFO. The adults are talking.Thank god for low-IQ purposeless, and low achieving dems to keep racism alive...
"She's never won anything" is a ridiculous thing to hold against someone. It's fucking stupid. Perhaps that's why I don't give two shits about team sports--endless blaming and claiming credit.That's why I said "IMO, CC deserves attention because she's really good and she's got the college scoring record to prove it."
She's got the record and she's a great player. But the flip side is that she's never won anything. And top end players, like Breanna Stewart, who is white has said that it matters. So, if the players who are winning aren't getting the attention like the players who aren't winning then there's going to be some bad feelings there.
I don't know if you watched Davidson back when Steph Curry was there. He was cooking the other teams. But they never won anything. So while people praised his individual talent, he wasn't elevated to another level just because of it.
Women's basketball has a way to go before they can find the balance. However, they do need a Caitlin Clark if they want to increase their marketability. She's relatable and that makes her marketable. Plus every sport needs a person/team to love/hate so they can craft storylines around them.