- Joined
- Nov 15, 2010
- Messages
- 12,495
- Reaction score
- 1,709
Agreed. Aldo Mendes 2 and Aldo Edgar 1 where both what I would consider competitive fight but both with a clear 4-1, 49-46 winner.I don't agree with your criterion for assessing competitiveness. If we take it to its logical consequences, it implies that there is no such thing as a competitive round. I, on the other hand, think there is; I can conceive a scenario where a fighter loses every round narrowly and I am perfectly happy to call that a competitive fight. Going back to the Cormier-Jones fight, I would say all the rounds before the eye poke were competitive. I don't know if your claim that he won one round is your own assessment or if you're just reporting the judges'. If it's the latter, please note that said judges agreed Cormier won a round but didn't agree on which it was. That tells you something.
Both fights should actually be used as training tools for judges because they are 2 rare examples of the judges using the criteria to the letter for the most part with 5 of the 6 coming to the correct conclusion. (1 judge managed to fuck it up by somehow giving Frankie RD5 for a 48-47.)