Hendricks won the 4th round against GSP, Dominated Lawler in the 5th round of their first fight, and had a shitty second title fight. That and him beating Condit in not the most exciting way just turns into "He's so boring"...Lawler didn't do a god damn thing in their second fight either except mean mug Hendricks the last 20 seconds and throw a bunch of punches that didn't land.
I thought Hendricks won the GSP fight, but he lost the rematch against Lawler and it's his own fault.
Besides landing some very good leg kicks, pushing your opponent against the fence and literally stalling should not result in a win. He pushed Lawler against the fence, put his head between Lawler's legs to avoid being hit there, looking like he was trying to jam his head up Lawler's ass - that should not get you a win.
Lawler landed the better punches throughout the fight, was constantly pushing Hendricks back, and was very effective with combinations in short bursts. He stole rounds with his aggression at certain parts of a few rounds. The fact Hendricks only looked to stall and Lawler would do short bursts of aggression is why Lawler won. Hendricks let that win slip away by stalling.
You said Lawler threw a bunch of punches and missed, but I guess you forgot about the numerous elbows Lawler landed while Hendricks was holding onto his legs for dear life, doing nothing but holding, holding, holding.
Lawler then gets up and swarms Hendricks with punches, knees, kicks. I guess you forgot about the nasty kicks to the body he landed.
So, to say Lawler landed nothing in that swarm is hilarious. I guess you didn't really watch the fight, or just have selective memory. You're clearly a big Hendricks fan, as you're here defending him and also have him in your sig, that's OK.
Taking tons of elbows to the ribs while holding onto your opponents leg, then Lawler escapes back to his feet, swarms with everything but the kitchen sink while Hendricks just moves backwards and defends and does nothing but that.. yeah, that looks great to the judges. Holding Robbie's leg > everything Robbie landed. Lmfao, Hendricks fans are hilariously bad at scoring fights. Stalling as much as possible > landing more, harder, cleaner, significant strikes and pushing forward and parrying and slipping your opponent's punches. Yeah, Hendricks dominated, bro!
Lawler's aggression in short bursts won him that fight. Lawler landing a bunch of good elbows to the ribs while Hendricks just held onto his legs, to getting back to his feet and swarming him with strikes. It doesn't matter if he landed powerful, clean punches, what matters is the aggression and pushing Hendricks back, keeping him defensive. He landed quite a few good strikes there, those body kicks especially.
Lawler doing this at the end of the 5th is the reason he won that round. Hendricks got a TD and did nothing with it. He looked to just hold on and Robbie landed some good strikes and being the aggressor looks very good to the judges. What Lawler did in the last 30-35 seconds of the fight > Hendricks useless TD.
TD's are very overscored and Hendricks tried to use that and it didn't work. Sometimes the judges score TD's like they're knockdowns from strikes. Luckily, the judges did reward a fighter for literally stalling while his opponent was constantly attacking even though his back was against the fence.
Lawler landed the better strikes throughout the fight and used short bursts of combinations, was aggressive at the right time and took educated rests.
The judges got it right. Go watch it again and accept that your boy did not get a gift decision for pulling this kind of bullshit. Hendricks didn't deserve to take home the belt that night. He didn't fight like a true champion should and Lawler outpointed him.
Lawler won.
Hendricks lost.
Get over it.
Take your blind, bias, selective memory, nuthugging BS somewhere else.