Social Jimmy Kimmel gets Canceled

Do you think 'The Jimmy Kimmel' show should have been cancelled?


  • Total voters
    284
People saying stuff, particularly Fox News, is not proof of anything, nor was it at the time of the incident. Further, in the preview, it says "political speech" but the link text says "banned over COVID-19 and political speech". To me, it lacks credibility. And it's a hedge to get around the legality of actions taken by the federal government that are "in the public interest".

If there is actual documentary proof that the Biden admin ordered these bans, where is it? If there was any in that old thread I never saw it. I'm not clicking on that shit so if those articles contain proof, you'll need to post it. Go fetch.

Incidentally, why is Google only taking this action now? Hmmmm I wonder. Do the CEO's lips have orange makeup on them? This couldn't have anything to do with a quid pro quo arrangement with Orange Peephole T, could it? Nahhhhhhh <lol>

^^^ Won't click on valid links to established news sites and asks for more proof.

do-ostriches-bury-their-heads-in-the-sand.jpg
 
^^^ Won't click on valid links to established news sites and asks for more proof.

do-ostriches-bury-their-heads-in-the-sand.jpg
You know how to copy and paste, don't you, clownshoes? What evidence do those pages contain that isn't just people making claims with no documentary evidence to back them? The answer is clearly zero or you would have responded to my post with that instead of this pathetic dodge. I'm not giving Faux News any clicks. Get over it, cope-master splash. Show me the receipts backing this "definitive proof"
 
You know how to copy and paste, don't you, clownshoes? What evidence do those pages contain that isn't just people making claims with no documentary evidence to back them? The answer is clearly zero or you would have responded to my post with that instead of this pathetic dodge. I'm not giving Faux News any clicks. Get over it, cope-master splash. Show me the receipts backing this "definitive proof"

You ask for proof and refuse to click on a valid news link. You're a troll. If I put up a malicious link, I would be banned.

We both know you have no argument, and your game is boring.
 
You ask for proof and refuse to click on a valid news link. You're a troll. If I put up a malicious link, I would be banned.

We both know you have no argument, and your game is boring.
I didn't claim the links were malicious. I'm not letting them earn money from my clicks. I have nothing to argue against because you won't post this "definitive proof" you claim they contain.

So, yeah, you've got nothing. Concession accepted.
 
Every night this week The Orange Swollen Ankle Kings TV has been covered in ketchup.
 
I didn't claim the links were malicious. I'm not letting them earn money from my clicks. I have nothing to argue against because you won't post this "definitive proof" you claim they contain.

So, yeah, you've got nothing. Concession accepted.

You: I won't read the links that nuke my claims, because I make them wealthy if I do! So I win by not being informed!

You're an idiot.
 
You ask for proof and refuse to click on a valid news link.

He's asking you to make an argument and you can't.

Cutting and pasting articles with no thoughts of your own and expecting everyone to read them one by one as you move on to the next one, just makes you looks stupid. If you thought the article had a tidbit worth discussing, then just lay it out.

This is how adults talk, Whippy. This should be too intimidating for you.
 
I didn't claim the links were malicious. I'm not letting them earn money from my clicks. I have nothing to argue against because you won't post this "definitive proof" you claim they contain.

So, yeah, you've got nothing. Concession accepted.
They could probably buy a bunch of stuff with the half a penny you would give them. Smart thinking Andy
 
You: I won't read the links that nuke my claims, because I make them wealthy if I do! So I win by not being informed!

You're an idiot.
c9393b75891c88533aeb8ba5626a9ddf.gif
You need to up your dose of cope, dope.

They could probably buy a bunch of stuff with the half a penny you would give them. Smart thinking Andy
It's the principle of the matter. Considering the composition of the WR nowadays, you may be wholly unfamiliar with people here having principles (e.g. see above), but mine are perfectly intact.

Perhaps instead of cheering on that loser, you'd like to have a go showing at me the documentary evidence that establishes the "absolute truth" that he claimed appears on those sites. I don't think you can, which is why you're trolling about my comments instead instead of contributing to the thread. But you're welcome to try.
 
Damn Sinclair bent the knee too?

This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
They need the FCC to change rules so they can complete a lucrative merger that is currently illegal so they'll take Carr right up the ass if they have to.
 
c9393b75891c88533aeb8ba5626a9ddf.gif
You need to up your dose of cope, dope.


It's the principle of the matter. Considering the composition of the WR nowadays, you may be wholly unfamiliar with people here having principles (e.g. see above), but mine are perfectly intact.

Perhaps instead of cheering on that loser, you'd like to have a go showing at me the documentary evidence that establishes the "absolute truth" that he claimed appears on those sites. I don't think you can, which is why you're trolling about my comments instead instead of contributing to the thread. But you're welcome to try.
You asked for a source and when you got one you refused to even look at it. You're a child. But stay high up there on that horse and refuse to actually address the topics you try to discuss while making accusations against others. It's really convenient isn't it? To make claims and then when refuted just refuse to even acknowledge them or read it. Just make up some bullshit reason for your refusal to admit you might actually be wrong on something.

<{Heymansnicker}>
 
He's asking you to make an argument and you can't.

Cutting and pasting articles with no thoughts of your own and expecting everyone to read them one by one as you move on to the next one, just makes you looks stupid. If you thought the article had a tidbit worth discussing, then just lay it out.

This is how adults talk, Whippy. This should be too intimidating for you.

The argument was made and supported by the links. He refused to click them, because he knew he lost.

You guys are either really stupid or just trolls, either way... You have nothing to offer.
 
You asked for a source and when you got one you refused to even look at it. You're a child. But stay high up there on that horse and refuse to actually address the topics you try to discuss while making accusations against others. It's really convenient isn't it? To make claims and then when refuted just refuse to even acknowledge them or read it. Just make up some bullshit reason for your refusal to admit you might actually be wrong on something.

<{Heymansnicker}>
Concession accepted.
 
The argument was made and supported by the links. He refused to click them, because he knew he lost.

Considering you've shared numerous links that end up being horseshit that often contradicts your point, you should do the bear minimum and show us you've read it yourself.

We used to ban people for spamming links with nothing else. And the WR was a better place then.
 
Considering you've shared numerous links that end up being horseshit that often contradicts your point, you should do the bear minimum and show us you've read it yourself.

We used to ban people for spamming links with nothing else. And the WR was a better place then.
bare*
 


This bad thing is only bad when your team does it. When our team does it, it's cool
 
Back
Top