- Joined
- Jul 2, 2013
- Messages
- 31,779
- Reaction score
- 27,665
I understand.It's not a feud but the things he listed didn't have anything to do with what I was asking about. That's all.
I understand.It's not a feud but the things he listed didn't have anything to do with what I was asking about. That's all.
Government workers are incredibly incompetent
NoNot really, no. That's just some blanket excuse for all of the irregularities in a facility that has never had this happen before. It's all a bit too much convenient "negligence" all at one time, that just so happens to surround a high profile inmate who just so happens to have very powerful people around the globe who would want him silenced.
Now we're being told it's unlikely it was captured on film. Another very convenient occurrence in this case...
Reminiscent of the 12 hours a day he was allowed out while serving the easiest time ever.https://nypost.com/2019/08/12/jeffrey-epstein-was-taken-off-suicide-watch-at-his-lawyers-request/
"Millionairephile Jeffrey Epstein, who apparently killed himself while in federal custody in Manhattan, was taken off suicide watch in late July at the request of his attorneys, according to a report.
The disgraced money manager was found unresponsive in his single-inmate cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center early Saturday and was declared dead at NewYork-Presbyterian Lower Manhattan Hospital.
Epstein had been meeting with his attorneys for up to 12 hours a day before they requested that he be taken off suicide watch, sources familiar with the matter told the Wall Street Journal."
12 hours a day? Lucky sumuma
It's been 25 years since someone killed themselves in that facility.No
We’re just learning about it because he’s high profile
Yes I still have questions as this is an open issue and this is a discussion forum.
Oh so edgy JonesBones - DOn't ask question. YOu will be dealt with. Oh sooo edgy.
I think (100%speculating here) suicide watch is like solitary, where it would do the individual mental harm to be on it or in it too long?I'm not from that state, and none of my personal experience and anecdotes can line up exactly with whatever their specific policy is, but.... I seriously, seriously doubt it.
Yup.A lot of people have questions and this doesn't appear to be a left or right thing, people on both sides of the aisle have a pretty WTF attitude about this. The biggest issue is not that Epstein was aphile and may have committed suicide. The big issue here ignored by some people in this thread is Epstein's connections. I dare say this entire episode is not about Epstein, its about Epstein's connections to billionaires, royalty, celebrities, and politicians. The big questions here are about how many of those people are
philes and its being ignored by certain people who want to chalk it up to a
phile who killed himself. This is WAY more than a
phile who killed himself.
It's been 25 years since someone killed themselves in that facility.
The rate is literally .00001%
That's the odds of a prisoner going into this facility and succesfully killing themselves.
Those are the odds we are expected to believe.
Yup.
It is absurd that some here (as @Anung Un Rama rightly pointed out) are suggesting the very discussion of this topic and highlighting the questions and issues is being challenged by many as forwarding baseless conspiracy theories. I have been told "you are raising question. The act of raising questions is a conspiracy theorist tactic, therefore that makes you a CTer.'
It is such a flawed understanding and misapplication of a reading.
There ARE tons of questions about this. Everyone associated with the Prison is asking them and some answers are coming out.
No 'asking questions' does not make one a CTer. It is how you accept the answers and what you do with the answers that does. Until you have answers, asking the questions is the natural thing to do.
And hopefully the questions, particularly as you raise, about co-conspirators and enablers continues if not criminally, at least civilly to be exposed and answered
.
I have been told "you are raising question. The act of raising questions is a conspiracy theorist tactic, therefore that makes you a CTer.'
It's ironic that you are now putting up a staunch defense of yourself from being called a "CTer tinfoil hat", considering how liberally you throw that card around yourself.
What goes around, comes around.
No irony just because you conflate issues incorrectly. You cannot quote anything that would resemble irony.It's ironic that you are now putting up a staunch defense of yourself from being called a "CTer tinfoil hat", considering how liberally you throw that card around yourself.
What goes around, comes around.
Ya he is a nutter.I remember that post and it was stupid. I immediately made a mental note not to engage that person in conversation.
The funny thing was is @MikeMcMann was against the conspiracy at first and was called out on it. Then turned around due to peer pressure. He is always going on about conspiracy nuts himself, you're right. The irony is delicious and now he is the victim.
No irony just because you conflate issues incorrectly. You cannot quote anything that would resemble irony.
No, this not sound reasoning. Besides the fact that rare events do happen anyway, the odds of a prisoner being able to commit suicide at the time Epstein committed suicide are dependent on the conditions in the prison at the time. It has nothing to do with conditions in years past. And we have reason to believe that the conditions during Epstein's suicide were significantly different due to deteriorating conditions, especially understaffing and underfunding. It is therefore not valid to lean on your (unproven) statistic.It's been 25 years since someone killed themselves in that facility.
The rate is literally .00001%
That's the odds of a prisoner going into this facility and succesfully killing themselves.
Those are the odds we are expected to believe.