- Joined
- Dec 15, 2011
- Messages
- 1,323
- Reaction score
- 144
If its true Dos Santos is the luckiest fighter in the ufc, the guy knocks people out with one big punch everytime.
I agree.
If he intended to hit Cain, and he did hit Cain, then that's not random luck. Same with Le/Franklin, or Fedor/Arlovski etc.
There's no such thing as a lucky punch in MMA unless you're swinging wildly with your eyes closed.
Agree
It wasn't lucky. JDS' career consists of early knockouts. If it didn't I might entertain the idea.
Agreed.
As I've said before, these Cain fans just turned into Shogun fans.
"Healthy Cain" can beat JDS.
Right, now GTFO. War JDS.
The only lucky move I recall in recent history was in TUF Smashes Finale, when Alloway threw a front kick to the body of Manny while Manny was switching level and it landed perfect in his chin. Other than that, this sport does not depend much on luck.
You can make a case for a random factor when Leonard Garcia throws a punch, since he pretty much swings his arms wildly without aiming. For JDS, no way.
All of you are wrong.
JDS used his skills, but there was also luck needed for the punch to land and be a KO punch.
Agreed.
As I've said before, these Cain fans just turned into Shogun fans.
"Healthy Cain" can beat JDS.
Right, now GTFO. War JDS.
There's luck needed for everything. Everything in MMA has luck to some extent. JDS KOing Cain had little to do with luck. Hes a massive power puncher. His UFC career consists of like 7 KOs and 2 decisions. It's not like Serra GSP at all. Cain also doesn't have the best chin or defence. I dont think it was luck.
that's the most retarded logic.
did you aim punch at the head? then it wasn't lucky?
How about? Did you aim the golfball at the hole? Then the hole in one wasn't lucky....
More goes into a punch than just aiming and swinging, the success depends on how your opponents moves into it and many other things. That's why fighters throw sometimes HUNDREDS of punches each fight and all of them are aiming to do serious damage but most don't.
So what's the difference between all the punches that Cung Le MISSED trying to do that same counter and the one that he landed?
Maybe that's the even better argument against the logic: cung le threw that same punch multiple times. It only landed the one time... so what was the difference?
I'm thinking the answer is that the opponent happened to move into perfectly this time instead of moving his head the other way like last time or staying out of reach like last time when Cung thought he was coming in. That difference IS the luck factor
Not really. Cain is in shape for every fight. He just got caught. It had nothing to do with health. Shogun struggles to get in shape. His title defense against jones was the most out of shape I've seen him in it was almost sad. An in shape shogun would have lost too, but I just couldn't believe how unprepared he looked for that fight
that's the most retarded logic.
did you aim punch at the head? then it wasn't lucky?
How about? Did you aim the golfball at the hole? Then the hole in one wasn't lucky....
More goes into a punch than just aiming and swinging, the success depends on how your opponents moves into it and many other things. That's why fighters throw sometimes HUNDREDS of punches each fight and all of them are aiming to do serious damage but most don't.
So what's the difference between all the punches that Cung Le MISSED trying to do that same counter and the one that he landed?
Maybe that's the even better argument against the logic: cung le threw that same punch multiple times. It only landed the one time... so what was the difference?
I'm thinking the answer is that the opponent happened to move into perfectly this time instead of moving his head the other way like last time or staying out of reach like last time when Cung thought he was coming in. That difference IS the luck factor
Exactly. There's luck needed in everything.
The problem is that it's extrememly hard to quanify luck, but it's unquestionably present.
People seem to think it's either luck or it's not.
Why can't it be a combination of both, which is the obvious explanation?
People seem to think it's either luck or it's not.
Why can't it be a combination of both, which is the obvious explanation?
It wasn't lucky. JDS' career consists of early knockouts. If it didn't I might entertain the idea.
yes actually; if you threw the same punch, intending to land each time, and only one out of 10 landed... there's luck involvedI don't agree with your logic. I think there are WAY less cases of "luck" in MMA than people say.
Why was the punch you intended to land, land and be lucky? I don't get that. Just because you missed multiple times, it is now luck?
So when baseball players like Ichiro Suzuki goes on a slump then gets a base hit, it was luck because he missed those previous times?
You really can't compare apples and oranges like golf holes in one comparing to a KO punch. The probability of a hole-in-one is far less chance of happening than landing a punch on someone not named Anderson Silva.
People seem to think it's either luck or it's not.
Why can't it be a combination of both, which is the obvious explanation?
yes actually; if you threw the same punch, intending to land each time, and only one out of 10 landed... there's luck involved
Otherwise, I'd love to hear YOU explain what the difference was between the one that hit and the ones that missed?
And yes, of course, when a baseball player goes into a slump and comes out of it, there is luck involved. If he's trying to use the same technique and failing each time and then suddenly the technique works... something changed but it wasn't something that HE did.
That's basically what we mean by "luck" in this situation: It's anything out of the fighters control.
Cung can aim, Cung can swing; but he can't control what his opponent does; such as where his opponents head ends up. Also he can't really control how well the punch impacts (which is why some punches barely phase someone and others knock people out cold)
Baseball's actually a good comparison. The hitter can aim at the ball, he can swing at the ball, but he can't control exactly where the ball goes or what type of pitch the pitcher uses or exactly how the impact happens (which is why each hit is different)
if the guy hits the ball and it goes right towards someone who can catch it.. that's bad luck, if the guy hits the ball THE EXACT SAME WAY TECHNIQUE-WISE and it goes away from the same outfielder, that's good luck.
This
people don't seem to understand or just don't want to accept that luck is A factor. Not THE only factor, but it's part of the equation.
maybe it's just the word luck. Maybe if we instead said "randomness" or something like that. or "Uncontrollable variables"
I like the definition of luck someone else posted - preparation meets opportunity - but you cannot deny that stating "JDS got lucky" or "that punch was lucky" essentially takes the win out of JDS' hands and places then into fate's.
Really, we're talking about semantics here, and "luck" here - for the most part - has negative connotations.
If JDS KOs Cain again in R1, is that still "luck?"