- Joined
- Mar 8, 2015
- Messages
- 2,971
- Reaction score
- 7,750
Famous last words.As long as we don't do stupid shit.
Warhawks neocons incompetent cabinet members everywhere....lol good night irene
Famous last words.As long as we don't do stupid shit.
SOON…Famous last words.
Warhawks neocons incompetent cabinet members everywhere....lol good night irene
Famous last words.
Warhawks neocons incompetent cabinet members everywhere....lol good night irene
I’m going off mossad reports which have cited it being that deep but there hasn’t been verificationto not have it sabotaged by bunker buster bombs?
btw, you keep using that 0.5 mile measure and it's wrong. It's 80 to 100 meters... in miles it's more like 0.05
So you understand finally why someone would handle Iraq as a threat years later regardless right or wrong on the USA second war with them.Look at you crying to mom and dad lol. Typical victim mentality.
Because Iraq invaded Kuwait = Bush Cheney Netanyahu get to lie and fool people into believing he has WMDs lol.
There's no point going back and forth with you. You'll call me some names and I'll just laugh and realize I'm talking to a brick wall who cannot be reasoned with.
There's so much historical context you're leaving out it's impossible to have an actual dialog with you.
Lets just agree to disagree and you call me an idiot or unhinged or whatever and move on.
LMFAO, I love the somersaults Iran apologists do to pretend Iran hasn't been actively working towards building a nuclear bomb despite being humiliated with bombshell headlines over and over the past 10 years revealing, no, in fact, everything the Israelis has alleged is true.
![]()
First, they denied Natanz existed at all. By 2003, they admitted it did.
Then, they insisted they didn't enrich uranium at all beyond 3.5%. Swore that to Obama in 2012 & 2013. Then, in 2015, they admitted they were enriching to 4.5%, after all.
Despite that, they said there was no reason they'd ever go above 5%. Said they weren't violating any deal. But it was later revealed they were enriching up to 20% as early as 2010 for "research-based reactors" in Tehran, and already has at least 3,500kg of that grade. Uh...what are you "researching" if you don't need higher than 3.5% for nuclear energy plants, LOL?
Now, we know they're capable of up to 60% at these facilities. They're marching their way up to 90%. Time to eliminate the facilities completely. Go Israel.
Yeah totally justified the second invasion Bush Cheney Netanyahu didn't even have to lie about the WMDs they could've just said hey guys they invaded Kuwait so we're good to go in.So you understand finally why someone would handle Iraq as a threat years later regardless right or wrong on the USA second war with them.
Yeah, I would rather have a liberal democracy remain the global hedgemoney than autocratic regimes like China or Russia. We are on the same page there. I am just uncomfortable with biting off the Snakes Head in Iran which will inevitably lead to a civil war.I mean pretty obviously the alternatives to American leadership are abysmal. I don't see how you can come to any other conclusion given the available options.
This is how rumors start..Hahahaha,
*clinks glass
I didn't justify anything. You are missing the point like usual because you are so stuck in your mindset that can't thinkYeah totally justified the second invasion Bush Cheney Netanyahu didn't even have to lie about the WMDs they could've just said hey guys they invaded Kuwait so we're good to go in.
Makes sense.
I didn't justify anything. You are missing the point like usual because you are so stuck in your mindset that can't think
Yeah, I would rather have a liberal democracy remain the global hedgemoney than autocratic regimes like China or Russia. We are on the same page there. I am just uncomfortable with biting off the Snakes Head in Iran which will inevitably lead to a civil war.
Hmmm, seeing reports of an “earthquake”, 5.2, outside Tehran, where there is a space and missile facility or something?
I am only seeing reposts of a headline, anyone got more info?
Edit: an area called Semnan?
North Korea having nuclear weapons has led them to serve as a useful buffer zone. China would absolutely not tolerate US forces stationed in a unified Korea that directly borders them. It's also let us put off a massive humanitarian crisis that would drop South Korea's economic performance drastically.Is a potential, not guaranteed, civil war actually a worse option to the current regime maintaining its hold, eventually developing nuclear weapons and entrenching itself indefinitely like in North Korea?
There's a range of possibilities that could occur, it doesn't mean the worst one will.
Question for you while you're here - are you seeing anything unusual in global shipping which would point to something big going down in the near future? Any changes in ship routing, insurance rates, or which country's ships have suddenly changed course or started avoiding certain areas?