- Joined
- Dec 15, 2013
- Messages
- 27,532
- Reaction score
- 14,789
Would a standard munition on top of the peak not make a flat spot to prep the impact site?
Alternatively, would an approach angle perpendicular to the slope of the mountain not be a 90 deg approach?
Doesn't seem like advanced trigonometry to me
Reeks of woke fake newsReeks of "I got paid"
She’s more than capableWe talk about this for a long time but really just pointing out that she has no experience in the field is all that needs to be said
And they call us R words
![]()
Yea duh. Errr
These idiots spent $3 trillion on the Iraq war, which was completely useless and also based on lies.
And now the exact same morons think it's a brilliant idea to get stuck in the Iran war.
Go ahead.
![]()
It was nothing less than one of the most egregious disgraces in American history. There was another $2 trillion down the tube to replace the Taliban with the Taliban after 20 years in Afghanistan when the majority of 9/11 hijackers were Saudi nationals and the alleged mastermind was hanging out in Pakistan the whole time, lol. Libya has been left in shambles for a generation if not longer; Assad deposed in secular Syria to be replaced by some Al-Nusra Front motherfucker.
![]()
I get that but the evidence is more than convincing.Pretty retarded to believe Netanyahu that's for sure.
I get that but the evidence is more than convincing.
If you don’t believe the propagandawhich is fine these are the facts and more than enough to warrant side eye on a country propping fringe Islamic ideology. Iran gets less than 1% of its current energy needs from nuclear even though it began over 50 years ago. It currently has in its possession 400kgs of 60% enriched material which could be increased to 90% with a simple technical process. It sits on the 3rd largest oil reserve in the world why does it even need nuclear? Why does it feel the need to put its most advanced enrichment facility buried inside a granite mountain? This isn’t Iraq
Stop using the R word. It’s beneath you