• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

International Israel - Iran Conflict: PEACE DEAL CONFIRMED

Choose the following that best describes your position


  • Total voters
    362
  • Poll closed .
 
There is s deal to be made here, really simple actually, and all parties win.

Middle Eastern non-proliferation treaty. Isreal admits to all their nukes and gives them all up under the eye of international authorities. Both Israel and Iran (as well as any other middle eastern country with nuclear capabilities) agree to constant ongoing inspections of all facilities with no barriers. NO country in the middle east can enrich over 10% and if they're found doing so it's a war crime and the counties leaders are jailed.

Why in the fucking world should Iran agree to give up nuclear capabilites when their mortal enemy has a large illegal stockpile of them? The same enemy that is launching a massive unprovoked attack on Iran as we speak.

Perfect solution, peace for all. I wonder who will disagree with this idea?? Hmmmm...
 

In retrospect, I don’t know why we were ever worried about his comically bad picks. They were all destined to become fall guys for his fuck ups anyways
 
Something about Jews and homosexuals of course. He may have changed since then though. He was an ultra progressive, then turned on a dime to being a hardcore Jew and homosexual hating Christian. Makes me wonder if it was all a gimmick. It really was convincing though. Even went down the Illuminati rabbit hole stuff too.
lol it was a gimmick. He went full troll when he decided to quit the forum. I remember he made some insane thread in the video game sub asking for recommendations of games for people with prosthetic arms or something
 

Tulsi Gabbard now says Iran could produce nuclear weapon 'within weeks'​


Tulsi Gabbard says Iran could produce nuclear weapons "within weeks", months after she testified before Congress that the country was not building them.

The US Director of National Intelligence said her March testimony - in which she said Iran had a stock of materials but was not building these weapons - had been taken out of context by "dishonest media".

Her change of position came after Donald Trump said she was "wrong" and that intelligence showed Iran had a "tremendous amount of material" and could have a nuclear weapon "within months".



<lol>

Reeks of "I got paid"
 
Yes.
It makes no difference, and the guiding system will not affect the way the bomb penetrates the ground. Fordow is under a mountain. Mountains have no 90-degree angles. The bomb impact area needs to be 90-degrees to the ground. Flat! It will tip on impact and go in at an angle, not straight down. I have already posted a video on this from an MIT professor who studies these particular effects. Trump is being lie to by the makers of the bomb. It is all about contracts and making money. When the mistake is realized, it will be too late. The GBU-57 only works on flat ground if it is to penetrate straight down. Fordow is not the case.

Would a standard munition on top of the peak not make a flat spot to prep the impact site?

Alternatively, would an approach angle perpendicular to the slope of the mountain not be a 90 deg approach?

Doesn't seem like advanced trigonometry to me
 
Back
Top