International Israel - Iran Conflict: PEACE DEAL CONFIRMED

Choose the following that best describes your position


  • Total voters
    362
  • Poll closed .
not-even-200-days-into-his-presidency-and-its-already-aged-v0-1lxiyzcchl7f1.jpeg


<{Heymansnicker}>

<{anton}>[<dunn]
 
IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi recently just said reports that Iran has not been actively pursuing a nuclear weapon since 2003.

Recent US intel reports also said they were not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon.

To reduce it down to "Tulsi is a Russian plant so she's lying" is fucking retarded when the argument for going to war is "Trust me bro" from Netanyahu.

Evidence for Iran getting nukes: US intel reports, IAEA, Iran being part of the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty (until very recently due to this attack.)

Evidence for starting a war that could potentially last years: Netanyahu said Trust Me Bro.

You mean this guy who testified two days ago that Iran has enriched uranium to 60% at multiple sites?

Are they enriching uranium beyond the threshold for civilian use for fun?

 


You gotta brush up on real info before you spew propaganda bs.

Listen to Scott Horton and then listen to Emily Austin.

You tell me who you sound like.

Pathetic

lol. They had 60% enriched uranium. Nothing to see here…..

That is the real info.

You are in denial.

60% to 90% is cake. That is weapons grade uranium. And over a month passed.
 
So there's no evidence, the timeline has been wrong - repeatedly - Netanyahu has never once been right about it, he has been wrong/lied over and over again, and there is no evidence Iran is close to a nuclear weapon today or that it even has weapons grade uranium today or that it has a warhead today or that it has a missile today.

Can we now stick to those facts?

Thank you.
You’re just gonna play retard now. It’s comical.

Again it’s a complete LIE to say they only have 60% enriched uranium. Why would they simultaneously block inspections and stop enriching their uranium? It’s fuckin nonsense. You can’t even believe it.
 


Benjamin Netanyahu has been claiming Iran is close to having nuclear weapons for over 30 years.

He's been wrong every single time he's put a time frame on it.

Is he right this time @kflo?


Since 1984 warmongers have been claiming Iran wants a nuclear bomb, and will be ready to launch it soon. This article from 41 years ago says Iran is “two years away”

 
Since 1984 warmongers have been claiming Iran wants a nuclear bomb, and will be ready to launch it soon. This article from 41 years ago says Iran is “two years away”

How many “years” away is 60% enriched uranium?
 
Again it’s a complete LIE to say they only have 60% enriched uranium.

You haven't really evidenced that, much less evidenced that Iran is close to a usable nuclear weapon.

Honestly, at this rate I am beginning to doubt that you will be able to evidence that.

Are you tapping out?
 
You haven't really evidenced that, much less evidenced that Iran is close to a usable nuclear weapon.

Honestly, at this rate I am beginning to doubt that you will be able to evidence that.

Are you tapping out?
Haha. Dude. It takes DAYS to go from 60% to weapons grade 90%. They are no longer allowing inspections. They committed to more sites. And you are here trying to gaslight that they just stopped at 60%. It’s fuckin sad.
 
You mean this guy who testified two days ago that Iran has enriched uranium to 60% at multiple sites?

Are they enriching uranium beyond the threshold for civilian use for fun?



Designing and manufacturing a nuclear weapon is not the same thing as enriching uranium to 60%. Everybody already knew Iran had enriched uranium. Literally nothing had changed except Israel found it politically and logistically convenient to attack now.

Yea they enriched it to 60% as a bargaining tool only after the Natanz nuclear facility was attacked on 04/11/21. Not only was their commercial nuclear facility sabotaged in 2021, they've been facing heavier sanctions since Trump pulled out of the deal in 2018. They only enriched to 60% so they could use it as a bargaining tool to ease sanctions.

1. You need uranium to be enriched to 90% for it to be weapons capable.
2. Iran does not have any delivery method or warhead to even do a nuclear strike.
3. Iran is not working on any technology to weaponize uranium for a weapon nor is it clear they have the advanced technical ability to do so. They're literally years away if they actually tried.

You want to desperately frame it as "OMG they're on the precipice of a nuclear weapon!!"

When that is obviously not true.

And you know that as well because you're not stupid. So stop lying. You're just on the pro-Israeli side so you're just making excuses for an unjustified attack.

You want to purposefully simplify it to "they have enriched uranium to 60% so they're gonna get nukes!!" relying on people not knowing anything or any of the details.

No one believes this gaslighting bullshit. This isn't the early 2000's when they successfulyy lied about Iraq WMD's. Most of the world knows it's BS - even a huge chunk of Trump's MAGA base.

Haha. Dude. It takes DAYS to go from 60% to weapons grade 90%. They are no longer allowing inspections. They committed to more sites. And you are here trying to gaslight that they just stopped at 60%. It’s fuckin sad.

And how long does it take for Iran to design and manufacture a warhead and delivery method that can deliver a nuclear explosion?
 
Last edited:
Haha. Dude. It takes DAYS to go from 60% to weapons grade 90%. They are no longer allowing inspections. They committed to more sites. And you are here trying to gaslight that they just stopped at 60%. It’s fuckin sad.

So you don't have any evidence whatsoever?

Just your insistence that it maybe sorta could've possibly happened, but that we ultimately don't know because again... no evidence.

I think that sums it up.

No evidence. Just your supposition about the speed at which something might happen, which is worth absolutely nothing.
 
So you don't have any evidence whatsoever?

Just your insistence that it maybe sorta could've possibly happened, but that we ultimately don't know because again... no evidence.

I think that sums it up.

No evidence. Just your supposition about the speed at which something might happen, which is worth absolutely nothing.
You’re fuckin pathetic. They enriched uranium to 60%, stopped any allowance for inspection, committed to more enrichment sites and you are playing retard asking to evidence they aren’t still at 60% despite it literally taking days to enrich to 90%.

All while playing dumb as to why they were at 60% to begin with.
 
You’re fuckin pathetic. They enriched uranium to 60%, stopped any allowance for inspection, committed to more enrichment sites and you are playing retard asking to evidence they aren’t still at 60% despite it literally taking days to enrich to 90%.

All while playing dumb as to why they were at 60% to begin with.

Right, okay, geez, we've got it.

You know absolutely nothing, you're guessing and assuming about what Iran might have done, and you think that's enough to start a war over.
 
You’re fuckin pathetic. They enriched uranium to 60%, stopped any allowance for inspection, committed to more enrichment sites and you are playing retard asking to evidence they aren’t still at 60% despite it literally taking days to enrich to 90%.

All while playing dumb as to why they were at 60% to begin with.

They stopped allowance for inspection because Trump pulled out of the deal in 2018 and put heavier sanctions against them.
 
Back
Top