International Israel - Iran Conflict: PEACE DEAL CONFIRMED

Choose the following that best describes your position

  • I do not support Israel attacking Iran

    Votes: 223 61.6%

  • I support Israel attacking Iran, but do not support America becoming directly involved.

    Votes: 93 25.7%

  • I’m for America directly involving itself in the conflict.

    Votes: 46 12.7%
  • Total voters
    362
  • Poll closed .
BluntForceTrama said:
images

At least the country will be done with these soon enough

Trump Bless
Click to expand...
This loser weirdo actually said “ Trump bless”…

We’ve hit new lows in here
 
Siver! said:
Israel could literally say "ABSOLUTELY NOW!" at any arbitrary point in time and he'd believe them.
Click to expand...
Why do they NOW have near weapons grade enriched uranium? And why did YOU try to suggest their current nuclear ambitions was “completely fabricated” by Israel?
 
kflo said:
IAEA reported on their enriched uranium. Not Israel. Iran then doubled down. We get that you hate Israel but they didn’t make up the report.
Click to expand...
Why does this have to be repeated so many times ..

People that ignore that fact say
“Guys they were always on the verge it’s the same ole talking points “”.
 
kflo said:
Why do they NOW have near weapons grade enriched uranium? And why did YOU try to suggest their current nuclear ambitions was “completely fabricated” by Israel?
Click to expand...

Tulsi Gabbard the Russian plant said it so it must be true.
 
kflo said:
Why do they NOW have near weapons grade enriched uranium? And why did YOU try to suggest their current nuclear ambitions was “completely fabricated” by Israel?
Click to expand...

No, you need to know that they're imminent when you attack a country (if that's your primary reason).

So where's the evidence that they had weapons grade enriched uranium right now?

It was so urgent that Netanyahu derailed all of the planned negotiations, so it had to literally be days away.

The IAEA report doesn't suggest they had 90 % enriched uranium, or a warhead, or a functioning missile ready, so why did they have to attack when they did?

And if they didn't, if they could conceivably have waited, surely you can't support this attack?
 
Rob Battisti said:
Didn’t Trump show the voice logs?
Click to expand...

Call logs* but yes. Of course trump is the lair, and not the guy with greased back hair who cheated on his wife by sleeping with his best friend’s wife, and went out to eat at a luxury restaurant while making it illegal for regular people to attend church and go out to eat.
 
Hellowhosthat said:
Which country has killed more people with bombs over the last ten years between Israel and Iran?
Click to expand...
The country whose neighbors waged war (through one of irans many terror proxies) against them? I mean, without Iran terror proxies continuously attacking Israel who knows…
 
kflo said:
Why would Iran develop such enriched uranium? Cmon, you can do it….. And hostilities were not “immediate”.
Click to expand...

Rafaele Grossi just yesterday said Iran was not intending to build a nuclear bomb and according to the inspectors who worked in the actual facilities known to us they didn't have the capacity to build one... UNLESS they have secret facilities which we still don't know and are doing clandestine enrichment

But let's assume for a moment that they were really close and Gabbard and CIA were wrong and they are really close to building it... why are israeli fighter jets not bombing those facilities???
They have so far only bombed Natanz on first day and proceeded with hitting national TV, appartments of military commander X, today they hit ministry of foriegn affairs WTF and the Tehran police department, one day sabotage damaged a Tehran PIPELINE... are you fucking kidding me, what are the real intentions here? I am starting to doubt it's not so much about the nuclear program! The nature of Israeli attacks tells me it's about forcing a regime change and no matter who gets involved or not, it's an illegal terrorist action with 600+ civilians already killed and God knows how many casualties incoming. I'm not saying regime change isn't a legitimate foreign policy tool the US should use. They should absolutely influence and help a new wave of iranian politicians come into power in the future and that will happen in the future with or without foreign aid. The thing is regime change won't ever happen when it is first initiated from another regional regime who is in an ongoing genocide process itself.
 
Siver! said:
No, you need to know that they're imminent when you attack a country (if that's your primary reason).

So where's the evidence that they had weapons grade enriched uranium right now?

It was so urgent that Netanyahu derailed all of the planned negotiations, so it had to literally be days away.

The IAEA report doesn't suggest they had 90 % enriched uranium, or a warhead, or a functioning missile ready, so why did they have to attack when they did?

And if they didn't, if they could conceivably have waited, surely you can't support this attack?
Click to expand...
Holy shit.

Dude. They had 60% enriched uranium in mid may. It literally takes DAYS to go from 60% to 90% and Iran was no longer cooperating and was actually doubling down on their ambitions.

Trump gave them 2 months to negotiate and got nothing.

So, again, why did you LIE and state Israel “completely fabricated” how close Iran was to nuclear capabilities?

So I’ll ask you again, why does Iran have such enriched uranium? Is this hard question or something?
 
www.bbc.co.uk

Iran and Israel launch more attacks as Trump weighs US involvement - live updates

Iran and Israel continue strikes on Wednesday night, after Donald Trump says the US "may" join the Israeli attacks.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk

"Israel's justifications for these attacks is that it faces an imminent and existential threat from Iran's nuclear program. So far that doesn't match publicly available information or expert assessment."

I guess they invented the urgency @kflo
 
kflo said:
Holy shit.

Dude. They had 60% enriched uranium in mid may. It literally takes DAYS to go from 60% to 90% and Iran was no longer cooperating and was actually doubling down on their ambitions.

Trump gave them 2 months to negotiate and got nothing.

So, again, why did you LIE and state Israel “completely fabricated” how close Iran was to nuclear capabilities?

So I’ll ask you again, why does Iran have such enriched uranium? Is this hard question or something?
Click to expand...

So it has 60 % enriched uranium, but it doesn't have 90 % enriched uranium, and there's no evidence of a nuclear weapon in the very immediate future.

Thanks for clarifying.

I'm actually glad we're on the same page for once.
 
Siver! said:
So it has 60 % enriched uranium, but it doesn't have 90 % enriched uranium, and there's no evidence of a nuclear weapon in the very immediate future.

Thanks for clarifying.

I'm actually glad we're on the same page for once.
Click to expand...
lol. They were caught with 60% uranium and stopped cooperating in may. It takes days to progress from 60 to 90%. So why are you again blatantly lying?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Scheme
International Azerbaijan - Armenia war over, peace brokered by US, leaders call for Trump Nobel Peace Prize
2
Replies
37
Views
898
Scheme
Scheme

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,009
Messages
57,960,972
Members
175,884
Latest member
cloudfair

Share this page

Back
Top