International Israel - Iran Conflict: PEACE DEAL CONFIRMED

Choose the following that best describes your position


  • Total voters
    362
  • Poll closed .
Can’t be that naive , a lot of evidence in this thread .
Iran has admitted they been in pursuit of this . They also have the unground facility. We figured it out in the 40’s how long until others can . There’s a few already





Maybe read what Tulsi has been testifying. Iran is nowhere near making a bomb.
there's zero need for this urgency now. it's just bibi profiting of the conjecture with having trump in office.
 
If the US actually strikes Iran, more than half MAGAs will rationalize a way to support american direct involvement in the war.
The U.S. has struck Iran multiple times before. Surgical airstrikes are different than declaring war and mobilizing infantry to enter Iran.
 
Maybe read what Tulsi has been testifying. Iran is nowhere near making a bomb.
there's zero need for this urgency now. it's just bibi profiting of the conjecture with having trump in office.

You don't need to enrich nuclear material past 4% for civilian nuclear power. Iran has been enriching uranium to over 60%

There is no reason to attempt to enrich beyond that point other than to practice enriching weapons grade uranium. Step one to making a bomb is enriching uranium to a certain quality.

If Tulsi is saying nothing to see here, that's her Russian handlers speaking.
 
Except that Iran hit Israel with a 1,000 missile attack last October and we all knew the payback was coming. You didn't forget about that attack?
Nice bit of historical amnesia. Iran sent 140 missiles, not 1,000, it was in April, not October*, and it was in DIRECT RESPONSE to Israel killing the Iranian Consulate and several other senior military figures the week prior.

In typical fashion, Israel attempts to play victim after a provocation, and half wits eat it up.

*EDIT - There was a carbon copy attack in October as well, see my follow up.
 
Last edited:
Has the new big, hard American Penetrator bomb ever been deployed in combat? I remember the air blast sibling being used only once on ISIS to blow out some cave complex. How deep into the Earth do the Israelis figure Fordow actually is? I've seen some pretty drastically different figures cited since the war started.

Never been used. It was built pretty much explicitly for this purpose.

I have seen reports in the neighborhood of 300-400 feet below ground. Which would require repeat strikes in order to guarantee that the job was done. I disagree with @Rational Poster ‘s assessment that you would send troops on the ground to verify destruction, as that would be far too dangerous. They would just keep hitting it from the air.
 
Maybe read what Tulsi has been testifying. Iran is nowhere near making a bomb.
there's zero need for this urgency now. it's just bibi profiting of the conjecture with having trump in office.
How would she know, she said that in Jan right ?
 
Accusing your enemies that which you are guilty of, @avenue94? So desperate in this discussion. You're flailing.

Oh wow, it went into effect in 2016? Yet evidence has proved Iran never stopped developing nuclear material.

Can't address that while maintaining credibility? Don't worry you never had any in the first place.

Passport?
International law?
You're drowning and begging anyone to throw you a floatie.

bork1}
That you avoid answering any questions do to your lack of knowledge is painfully obvious.

It's very simple: what aspect of JCPOA did Iran not comply with?
 
the us position has been against a nuclear iran. it's not just "helping a friend". it's against US interest for iran to be a nuclear power.

yeah, I remember those big bad nasty nukes Saddam had, maybe you aren't old enough to remember that shitshow in 2003. I remember Netanyahu saying he had them back then, too. I remember Netanyahu saying Iran has had nukes for like the last 25 years.
 
You think Tulsi wrote that report herself, and not the numerous analysts working for years on this file? Are all those also russians?

I mean there's elements of truth in the report as well, her personal framing of it is what likely differs from the experts who did the work for it. And her personal framing is certainly influenced by Russia based on all the bullshit she's put out on her own social media over the years.

There is no reason to enrich uranium to the level we know they have been for civilian reactors. Period.

You can be against military intervention and still be honest that Iran is trying to develop weapons grade uranium.
 
If Country B picks targets, then asks if there are any Country A doesn't want them to hit, then Country A didn't pick the targets. That's not mental gymnastics. It's simply not being a retard.
I don't think you understand what the word pick means in the English language.
Nope. No formal truce was established. This is merely a continuation. Biden's war. Democrats are warmongerers.

Can't have it both ways, sweetheart.
I see you don't understand what de facto means.
In the minds of the DPRK, clearly the war never ended
It's actually in the minds of the entire legal community. The Korean War is de facto over but de jure not over.
 
Back
Top