Elections Is Tulsi Gabbard a Russian asset?

Is Tulsi Gabbard Putin's Manchurian Candidate?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Not Sure


Results are only viewable after voting.
Where do you guys come up with this stuff? <Huh2>

From her family history (of a cult in hawaii) and her positions in politics, coupled with how the right wing has coddled her recently. Mostly those things.
 
Also included on the list was a senior CIA officer who had been working undercover, though Gabbard was unaware of this at the time, The Wall Street Journal reported. However, sources told the newspaper that Gabbard did not consult with the intelligence agency before posting the list of names to her 762,000 online followers

The undercover CIA officer had worked in intelligence posts for more than 20 years and served as an expert on Russia and Eurasia on the National Intelligence Council between 2014 and 2017, according to the WSJ.
 
Russian spies in the US government is a typical paranoia created from the end of the cold war when russia got back up from it's feet, after the collapse of the USSR by some journalists and theorists who are not even security expertS.

The same people who were saying that Trump is a russian satellite are saying that Gabbard is another. For some US politicians who are poor chess players, they end up getting compromised with sextapes by foreigners like the russian. Sextapes do not allow a total control of a politician, simply a defense measure if he decided to go against your interests in an aggressive way. It's more a shield than a sword on the scale.

To believe some media, who want to create false drama, you don't have a dozen of russian spies in each gov institutions, because simply to get there, you need a clearance and to be part of the US intelligence community.

It's simply the price of the commodification of information and journalism, you will say anything that will sell and make drama for money, even if it is false. Trump is not a russian spy, as gabbard is neither a russian asset.
 
Last edited:
Also included on the list was a senior CIA officer who had been working undercover, though Gabbard was unaware of this at the time, The Wall Street Journal reported. However, sources told the newspaper that Gabbard did not consult with the intelligence agency before posting the list of names to her 762,000 online followers

The undercover CIA officer had worked in intelligence posts for more than 20 years and served as an expert on Russia and Eurasia on the National Intelligence Council between 2014 and 2017, according to the WSJ.

Remember when Scooter Libby/Plame Affair was a big scandal?

This won't even be in the news cycle for a week. What a time to be alive.
 
Remember when Scooter Libby/Plame Affair was a big scandal?

This won't even be in the news cycle for a week. What a time to be alive.

It really is remarkable isn't it? Trump and his administration are such incompetent, toxic pieces of shit that they have completely redefined the concept of a political scandal. A fuck-up that used to bury an administration is now a daily occurrence. What used to occupy the news headlines for weeks now gets pushed out of the cycle entirely within a couple days in order to make room for the next horrific thing coming out of the White House.

Fuck every dumb, racist, cowardly, gullible motherfucker that voted for these retards.
 
This thread is remarkable. It aged like milk left out in Death Valley for a month in July.

Tulsi sues Hillary for claiming she's a Russian asset, then withdraws the lawsuit, claiming she had to focus on her #1 priority: stopping Donald Trump! How'd that work out! Now she's one of his top lackeys!

Hillary knew what the deal was all along, but so many of our brainlets got bamboozled by Tulsi.
 
What is the name of the CIA agent that Tulsi Gabbard outed?
 
It was also really funny when Tulsi tapped out, and withdrew her lawsuit against Clinton, Clinton released a statement that said "good riddance," except it was written in Russian, lol.

If they could set up some kind of kumite-style intellectual death match debate format, with a chief protagonist debating opponents one after another, I'd bet Hillary could take that seat for about a whole day and lay waste to this entire administration one after the other after the other, and have plenty to spare for half the DNC right after it. She's got more brains and balls- and crucially,, far, far more knowledge- than the lot of them. She's a pretty unlikeable person (that may be an understatement) and represents most of what is awful about the DNC/establishment dems, but in stature and intellect she would stand head and shoulders above pretty much everyone currently in Congress and the Senate.
 
Okay, so this story about Tulsi Gabbard is not analagous to the story of Robert Novak outing Valerie Plame.
Wolf tickets.
Its a different betrayal.
The CIA agent she named, wasn't really outed because apparently a public facing member fo the CIA, not undercover like Plame was.
The betrayal here is of our intelligence community as a whole to make Putin happy.
 
What is the name of the CIA agent that Tulsi Gabbard outed?
Andrew Cedar,
Andrew P. Miller,
Benjamin A. Cooper,
Beth E. Sanner,
Brett M. Holmgren,
Charles A. Kupchan,
Christopher Center,
Corinne A. Graff,
Dilpreet K. Sidhu,
Edward Gistaro,
Perry the Platypus,
Emily J. Horne,
Harry Hannah,
Heather R. Gutierrez,
Jamie S. Jowers,
Jeffrey M. Prescott,
Joel T. Meyer,
Joel Willett,
John W. Ficklin,
Julia S. Gurganus,
Julia Santucci,
Loren DeJonge Schulman,
Luke R. Hartig,
Maher B. Bitar,
Mark B Feierstein,
Mary Beth Goodman,
Megan F. Doherty,
Michael P. Dempsey,
Perry J. Blatstein,
Richard H. Ledgett,
Samantha E. Vinograd,
Sarah S. Farnsworth,
Shelby L. Pierson,
Stephanie O'Sullivan,
Thomas W. West,
Vinh X. Nguyen,
William J. Tuttle,
Yael Eisenstate.
 
Its a different betrayal.
The CIA agent she named, wasn't really outed because apparently a public facing member fo the CIA, not undercover like Plame was.
The betrayal here is of our intelligence community as a whole to make Putin happy.
I can’t believe the director of the NSA accidentally outed an undercover CIA operative on Twitter.

I mean, I can. it Just sucks that it’s not surprising
"The CIA agent she named, wasn't really outed because apparently a public facing member fo the CIA, not undercover"

"I can’t believe the director of the NSA accidentally outed an undercover CIA operative on Twitter."

The failure to present a consistent story results in low sales of Wolf Ticktets.
 
Russian spies in the US government is a typical paranoia created from the end of the cold war when russia got back up from it's feet, after the collapse of the USSR by some journalists and theorists who are not even security expertS.

The same people who were saying that Trump is a russian satellite are saying that Gabbard is another. For some US politicians who are poor chess players, they end up getting compromised with sextapes by foreigners like the russian. Sextapes do not allow a total control of a politician, simply a defense measure if he decided to go against your interests in an aggressive way. It's more a shield than a sword on the scale.

To believe some media, who want to create false drama, you don't have a dozen of russian spies in each gov institutions, because simply to get there, you need a clearance and to be part of the US intelligence community.

It's simply the price of the commodification of information and journalism, you will say anything that will sell and make drama for money, even if it is false. Trump is not a russian spy, as gabbard is neither a russian asset.
Have you ever heard of Kim Philby? It happens.
 
"The CIA agent she named, wasn't really outed because apparently a public facing member fo the CIA, not undercover"

"I can’t believe the director of the NSA accidentally outed an undercover CIA operative on Twitter."

The failure to present a consistent story results in low sales of Wolf Ticktets.
Can you cite the source that says the CIA asset was not undercover? I can understand if the person had a forward facing role be at diplomatic or otherwise because that would allow them to operate in a clandestine manner behind the scenes.

Maybe the director of the national security agency should’ve checked with the central intelligence agency before firing off names like that just to be sure? Call me crazy.
 
Can you cite the source that says the CIA asset was not undercover? I can understand if the person had a forward facing role be at diplomatic or otherwise because that would allow them to operate in a clandestine manner behind the scenes.

Maybe the director of the national security agency should’ve checked with the central intelligence agency before firing off names like that just to be sure? Call me crazy.
He's going to cite me; what I read was the agent wasn't undercover.
Apparently thats only partially true. While some of the agents were public facing; meaning it was no secret they worked for the CIA, it does appear that at least one may have been undercover.
 
Back
Top