- Joined
- Sep 24, 2007
- Messages
- 56,966
- Reaction score
- 28,926
Jon's fans are the most fragile desperate posters in sherdog history. The way they're clinging to Gane to validate Jones ducking, Gane doesn't even have to win and they will throw a fucking parade if he lasts 1sec longer vs tom then Jones, there will be a celebration thread here they play grab ass inIts just a handful of Jon fans making a lot of noise.
So, injury its not a loss?
If you are nitpicking in a GOAT argument is determining who gets what fight purse you might say that but then you wouldn't be in this thread. If you are putting forth an argument that on the surface is about which of two fighters is the better fighter but you lie about what you're doing as soon as someone implicitly calls you on the idiocy of your argument, then you're Gregoire1.So, injury its not a loss? Anderson loss to Weidman is not legit? Or OMalley loss to Vera?
The other guy has never won a title fight either.One guy is 0 and 2 in title fights.
The other guy is the champion.
That's their current fighting resume.
The other guy has never won a title fight either.
It's funny cause Poirier's second win against McGregor is widely considered legitimate, but Aspinall's loss to Blaydes "doesnt count"If you are nitpicking in a GOAT argument is determining who gets what fight purse you might say that but then you wouldn't be in this thread. If you are putting forth an argument that on the surface is about which of two fighters is the better fighter but you lie about what you're doing as soon as someone implicitly calls you on the idiocy of your argument, then you're Gregoire1.
The is no legitimate reason to consider Aspinall's loss to Blaydes in any comparison between Aspinall and Gane that anyone would actually make, and you know it. Your contemplation of the goalposts in an entirely different stadium is an admission of as much.
Go lick a toxic Smurf.
I was just stating a fact. Your OP is garbage.Yep, and his best win and opponent is... GOAT Blaydes!!![]()
Objectively not true. Tom is 2/2 in title fightsThe other guy has never won a title fight either.
I replied to someone saying Gane was 0-2 in title fights and Aspinall was the champion.Objectively not true. Tom is 2/2 in title fights
If you legitimize it as a loss you're saying the opponent "won" by not actually actively doing anything to hurt their opponent.
It says absolutely nothing about who the actual better fighter was.
It's funny cause Poirier's second win against McGregor is widely considered legitimate, but Aspinall's loss to Blaydes "doesnt count"
. "Not actively doing anything to hurt their opponent" can be used in half of decisions victories lol.
He was injuried in a fight (not before or after), so its fight cause him being injuried, so its legitimate loss.
It's distinction without a difference imo. They each have a title fight win and Tom has a title defense. Gane also has two title fight losses while Tom has yet to lose in a title fight. And for those who say Tom's Interim title fights don't count, consider which defense was more legit, Tom/Blaydes or Jon/Stipe? Not to mention neither Tom or Jon took their belts from the undisputed champ in the first place.I replied to someone saying Gane was 0-2 in title fights and Aspinall was the champion.
Both Gane and Aspinall have won an interim title fight (Tom won 2).
Neither has won an undisputed title fight.