Is Michael Bisping the worst middleweight champion / worst fighter to win a belt?

Prime vs Prime. he losses to silva, whittaker, romero, israel, weidman, mousasi, jacare, rockhold, hendo, vitor, machida,
1.-Bisping-Picture.jpg
Fuck off you massive cunt.
 
K. I don't feel the need to find the one where Rockhold got knocked out in a round.
That fight was flukish, and Rockhold went on a skid after that

If you took them both in their prime and had them fight 100 times, Rockhold would win the majority of them

You know this
 
So yeah clearly an attempt to disparage bispings achievements. Bisping is the most winningest fighter in ufc middleweight history, never backed down from anyone and won the belt on two weeks notice. Great fighter and great story of someone who never gave up when he could of easily done so.
 
No, At one point he had the record for the most UFC wins. He won the championship fair and square.

Not even thinly veiled hate threads.
 
Prime vs Prime. he losses to silva, whittaker, romero, israel, weidman, mousasi, jacare, rockhold, hendo, vitor, machida,
1.-Bisping-Picture.jpg
Prime bs prime I think he could beat Weidman and possibly Romero he is super underrated if he didn't get the belt he would be considered one of the best fighters to never win a belt... he was almost unwrestlable and fought smart every fight.
 
Prime vs Prime. he losses to silva, whittaker, romero, israel, weidman, mousasi, jacare, rockhold, hendo, vitor, machida,
1.-Bisping-Picture.jpg

Not even at middleweight. Rockhold was a worse champion and got KO'd by Bisping.
 
<BidenShutIt>

He had a nice career. Was given a chance and he made the most of it. Good for him.
Can't hate a man for that. Go make something of yourself instead of wasting negative energy at other people. Make a thread about someone you do like or something.
 
Back
Top