the_harbinger
Orange Belt
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2008
- Messages
- 359
- Reaction score
- 0
Just to keep it in context:
Exactly, Dan. I have a great amount of respect for Ross, but I'm not sure if he should have replied without watching the video first.
Just to keep it in context:
Exactly, Dan. I have a great amount of respect for Ross, but I'm not sure if he should have replied without watching the video first.
Sure he would have. Some of you have severe reading comprehension problems. Read what he says. They don't win on chin up bars, or in the weight room. They win on the mat. I posted it to share, varying modalities of working out. Yet some of you sit and trash the best program in the country because they don't lift well. Haha, yet none of you questioning their lifting, could make that team. Irony?
Your point changes nothing. its kind of like complaining without a solution. Most DI programs other than football and basketball are the back burners for funding etc, or time spent from S&C coaches. The good ones are not as plentiful as you think. That's why most top college football coaches take their S&C coaches with them when they leave ala Urban Meyer.
I wouldn't ay they promote bad form, but that wasn't the purpose there either. none of them were using max weights either.
Injuries, well we will see.
Either way, it was shown to give people a look at things. Then all the glory hounds, that ift perfectly(yet aren't anywhere near that caliber) shoot it to shit.
Only on the internet
Not arguining their form. I am saying what does it matter in the gammit of their championship run? Your solution is much easier said than done. I explained why, but you failed to read it.
Stronger? Better program? Or better form? How many available S&C coaches are available with a superior wrestling background?
Sure it does. No matter what you know, it is most likely you can take the guy in your weight class, and his matt strength would be stronger than yours no matter what the gym strength is. Years of resistance is why.
Not at Iowa
Not arguining their form. I am saying what does it matter in the gammit of their championship run? Your solution is much easier said than done. I explained why, but you failed to read it.
Stronger? Better program? Or better form? How many available S&C coaches are available with a superior wrestling background?
Sure it does. No matter what you know, it is most likely you can take the guy in your weight class, and his matt strength would be stronger than yours no matter what the gym strength is. Years of resistance is why.
Not at Iowa
There are plenty of strength coaches for hire, and you're telling me a large college can not find one to hire?
I am telling you there are not that many around to hire
Why would the coaches have to have a wrestling background? Hire a weightlifted for weights, a wrestler for wrestling.
*sigh* would you hire Billy Rush for Football players? No, MMA yes. Would you hire Charlie Francis for baseball? No track of course. Thats' why. Come on now
Again, you fail to realize or admit that their training can be better. I don't know why you do this, are you the trainer?
I'm not their trainer. Sure they could use a better strength coach, but he may be it for now, and I enjoyed seeing his perspective.
It's the bottom line, at a high level of competition with better training you WILL be better at your sport than before. Especially in a sport like wrestling where strength is very important.
Maybe none of us couldn't make the team because we're not as good WRESTLERS as they are. And why does a good strength coach have to have a wrestling background? Oh, wait...I forgot. Their coach must be making them perform lifts with form that makes their "wrestling muscles" stronger...
Look, bro, there is a way to do a press/clean/chin/row the right way...and it is also possible to do them the wrong way...which is what they're doing.
And, btw, you posted this on a fucking WEIGHT LIFTING forum. What the hell did you expect when people started criticizing their form?
In blue
Well here is the thing. Are they better since he got there? Worse? Even? Actually they have improved. That there is proof enough for me. Could they have improved more? Maybe, but you can't argue success.
I beg to differ. I told you why. if I wanted to train Football players, I would not call Rush, or Warrent, I would call parisi. That's my point. Damn comprehension is lacking these days.
Well here is the thing. Are they better since he got there? Worse? Even? Actually they have improved. That there is proof enough for me. Could they have improved more? Maybe, but you can't argue success.
I beg to differ. I told you why. if I wanted to train Football players, I would not call Rush, or Warrent, I would call parisi. That's my point. Damn comprehension is lacking these days.
So, let me get this straight...
The strength coach HAS to have competed in the sport he is helping train athletes for? I agree that would be beneficial, but not necessary.
If I my goals are to compete in MMA (which they are, one day), then does that mean my strength coach must have competed in MMA? Not necessarily.
I wouldn't be turning down Louie Simmons for a strength coach. :icon_chee
So, let me get this straight...
The strength coach HAS to have competed in the sport he is helping train athletes for? I agree that would be beneficial, but not necessary.
If I my goals are to compete in MMA (which they are, one day), then does that mean my strength coach must have competed in MMA? Not necessarily.
I wouldn't be turning down Louie Simmons for a strength coach. :icon_chee
This is my point! They had the chance to improve even more.
But this seems to be beyond you.