- Joined
- Aug 16, 2010
- Messages
- 8,834
- Reaction score
- 790
DAMAGE is more important than getting a takedown and doing jack shit with it. I'm glad Henry won but he really didn't do anything of significance.
Why would they change it now when it was lay and pray was abused by so many others already?
1. GSP
2. Fitch
3. Phil Davis
4. Askren (not UFC)
Who says MM did more damage?Link to article https://ftw.usatoday.com/2018/08/ufc-227-results-demetrious-johnson-henry-cejudo-judges-stats
Says judges at fault mm out striked and out poined and threw more than his oppenant but judges though lay n pray is the most skilled technique . i didnt watch this fight dont want to bbut why arent fighters saying anything about the point system everybody knows its messed up yet nobody does anything or cares.
I think if improved position or GnP is used then it should be counted for. Not just holding them down guard.But what if the striking is close with one guy (MM) slightly winning? Then the TD can/should be a deciding factor IMO
People have a weird obsession with trying to downplay takedowns. You cannot just pretend they never happened and score the round without them.
So if a guy gets his ass kicked for a good portion of the round and then gets a takedown does that mean the round is scored in his favor or he gets a draw? By that logic you must've though Nik Lentz beat Tyson Griffin and Leonard Garcia beat Nam Phan.
But what if the striking is close with one guy (MM) slightly winning? Then the TD can/should be a deciding factor IMO
Obviously not exact 100% of the time, but as a general rule of thumb you can use the below to score fights in MMA:
If the fight was on the feet for 3 minutes and on the ground for 2, the person who won the standup probably won the round.
If the fight was on the ground for 3 minutes and the feet for 2, the person who won the ground probably won the round.
Damage is subjective, imagine Jones vs Vitor going to decision; TRTor fucked up Jones' elbow in their fight, Jones gave Vitor concussion, which should be considered worse ? What if somebody shows damage more easily than their opponent because of scar tissue or whatever ?No idea if it's because of the MM fight, but damage should ALWAYS > position imo.
Seriously, fuck position.
I don't think any one individual fighter is worth it, at least not at the moment. It would take a wave of new fighters with specific martial skills - and a willingness to fight on a regular, reliable schedule, making the UFC a dramatically larger business to affect that kind of change.In a word, yes.
MM is not worth it.
Yes.I don't think any one individual fighter is worth it, at least not at the moment. It would take a wave of new fighters with specific martial skills - and a willingness to fight on a regular, reliable schedule, making the UFC a dramatically larger business to affect that kind of change.
Looking up stats to determine who won needs to stop
DC even pointed out how inaccurate the fight stats were during the fight.
I don't disagree. But it's also possible the scoring could have affected MM's striking in less visible ways. It's possible that, since this time Cejudo showed more capability to get MM down to the ground and keep the fight there, MM was more hesitant to throw head and body shots because that combined with leg kicks could have opened him up for even more takedowns. The threat of losing position affects everything; it will also affect your ability to function in the standup since a wrong move could lead to you being brought to the mat and losing on scorecards regardless of what happens after.The only thing DJ was landing all fight were leg kicks to the shin and body. At no point did DJ land anything really damaging. Yeah he landed those low leg kicks sure. But that's all he did. Henry didn't do much more either with the take downs. A very low damage yield of fight imo. Henry should be back asap.
I think if improved position or GnP is used then it should be counted for. Not just holding them down guard.
Now imagine how mainstream media handles "REAL" news. Lmao. They can't even be honest with a niche sports story.The bias in that article is so strong. Everywhere you look people are talking about what a close fight it was, and this article frames it up like it was a no-brainer that MM should have won and the judges screwed him.