what does my point have to do with this? Anderson's fault that Anderson lost, sure. It's still a shame that the knocked out, destroyed dude won the fight for scoring points, isn't it man. I wasn't even originally making this argument but surely it's a fucking shame that this scoring system allows Bisping to win that fight.Go tell Anderson not to stand with his back against the cage for an entire round while letting his opponent tee off on him, then.
Robbie needed the finish, he was down on the scorecards going into the 5th.Was he really on his way too winning, or are you just riding the narrative?
So Bisping should get punished for Anderson's ability to not get cut or bruise easily?
He was ahead 3-1 on the scorecards.
Amazing how people are trying to reinvent the rules of the sport when it comes to scoring criteria
Michael mainly got busted up because of the sucker knee, and the rest of the beatdown came after the cheap knee at which point he was severely diminished.
So Bisping should get punished for Anderson's ability to not get cut or bruise easily?
Robbie needed the finish, he was down on the scorecards going into the 5th. If that's the fight you guys are talking about.
"Rory MacDonald was literally four minutes away from winning the welterweight title and returning it to Canada, according to the scorecards at last Saturday night's (July 11, 2015) UFC 189 pay-per-view (PPV) event in Las Vegas, Nevada, as all three judges had "Red King" ahead of Robbie Lawler heading into the fifth and final round."
http://www.mmamania.com/2015/7/12/8...recard-had-red-king-winning-title-ufc-189-mma
Sucker knee? The fight was still going, the mouth piece had been out for 15 seconds, how can you possibly say that was a sucker knee?
You implied the guy was going with a narrative, rather than the facts.That's exactly the definition of a "narrative". Thanks.
Was he really on his way too winning, or are you just riding the narrative?