Movies In the Name of the Father vs. On the Waterfront - Which is the better film?

Which is the better film?


  • Total voters
    18

Takes Two To Tango

The one who doesn't fall, doesn't stand up.
Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,723
Reaction score
49,994
Two remarkable acting performances from the lead actors.

That's not including the rest of the casts which just as incredible.

And two very good films.

Who do you got?



In the Name of the Father - Plot Summary:


Unemployed young Irishman Gerry Conlon (Daniel Day-Lewis) gets by as a petty thief in 1970s Belfast.

When local IRA leaders get fed up with him, he flees to England and meets up with his friend Paul Hill (John Lynch). On the same night that the IRA bombs a nearby pub, the friends get kicked out of their communal digs and are forced to sleep in a park.

He returns to Belfast, but is arrested as the prime suspect in the bombing and imprisoned, where he spends 15 years trying to clear his name.


On the Waterfront - Plot Summary:


Dockworker Terry Malloy had been an up-and-coming boxer until powerful local mob boss Johnny Friendly persuaded him to throw a fight.

When a longshoreman is murdered before he can testify about Friendly's control of the Hoboken waterfront, Terry teams up with the dead man's sister Edie and the streetwise priest Father Barry to testify himself, against the advice of Friendly's lawyer, Terry's older brother Charley.





 
On The Waterfront though it's highly overrated imo. Kazan did a better film with similar themes called A Face In The Crowd. It has Andy Griffith playing heel and its legit one of the best American films of the 50s and relevant to today's politics.
 
I haven't seen either but I actually own In the Name of the Father and have been wanting to watch it.
 
pulp-fiction-allow-me-to-retort.gif


There are apparently over 3000 movies with a rating of 8.1 on IMDB.


How about On the Waterfront vs Hachi: A Dog's Tale?

<RawexDidThis1>

Well I purposely picked these two and it wasn't random, because I thought it was a good match up. Being rated at 8.1 and I didn't do a search with low amount of votes like you did. I search with at least 90k votes at 8.1 so the results is only 77 films.

This is the link.


Plus the lead actors are known as perhaps the greatest actors that ever lived. Both were nominated for an Oscar for their roles. The choices of these two films are not by accident or random as you say.
 
Well I purposely picked these two and it wasn't random, because I thought it was a good match up. Being rated at 8.1 and I didn't do a search with low amount of votes like you did. I search with at least 90k votes at 8.1 so the results is only 77 films.

This is the link.


Plus the lead actors are known as perhaps the greatest actors that ever lived. Both were nominated for an Oscar for their roles. The choices of these two films are not by accident or random as you say.

That's a much better explanation than just saying they're both 8.1 but it's still pretty random. Out of curiosity, what made you choose 8.1? Why didn't you just compare films where they both won Oscars?
 
Back
Top