Woodley was the first person to ever land a TD on Thomson, when grapplers like Rory McDonald failed on all their attempts (and while Rory technically wasn't a college wrestler, he was a hell of an MMA wrestler/grappler who could rag doll Condit, Diaz, et al). You're underestimsting Thomson based on his old man performance against Burns, and possibly forgetting how Woodley manhandled fighters like Condit (and even the ghost of Woodley landed a TD on Colby).
It's pretty clear that Till (and Thomson) were above the Condit/Diaz tier of wrestling/grappling defense you were implying they were at (let alone the Hardy level), at least when they were on their streaks.
Not saying Woodley isnt a good wrestler, but when you can only bring him is pretty telling.
Till got a very favourable match up to enter the WW rankings vs Cowboy (evolution?) in 2017, and in 4 years you can only bring Woodley...for the belt.
Any example of a long time top ranked who can compare to that a decade ago? Hardy is not the case
Regarding Woodley, he was always very hard to take down but not that good offensive grappler.
Not sure what mahandling you talk about vs Condit, before the injury. Woodley clinched early and didnt get anything going nor landed anything from there. Then timed well two TDs off exchanges and what happened then?
No GnP, no passing, no nada. Nothing resemblant to Woodley vs WB/Till in the ground.
Woodley outpowered out of subs and after half a minut in both instances, stood up refusing to be in Condit's guard. I dont know what reading you do of stats but I watched the fights, mate.
Woodley wasnt much a TD/ground threat for Marquardt or Rory, who btw got outwrestled to a draw by 40 years old Fitch for the Bellator tittle.
It's pretty clear Brunson is a lot more technical and tactical than he was 6 years ago, similar to how Bisping had evolved by 2015 despite his age and beat Luke Rockhold with no training camp.
I think the Jarod fight will show us where he is, but regarding the Middleweight division talent as a whole, I'd be confident in Whittaker and Izzy beating anyone in the Top 5 from the 2005 - 2015 era a majority of the time (as they were then).
You could be right about Brunson. I dont see those pretty clear technical improvements you talk about but he is definitely more experienced and still a great athlete even though "pretty clear" has declined in speed
2005-2015 is a very long time span. The sport evolved during that decade in upper weightclases way, way more than it did since USADA arrived around 2015.
Im confident that Whittaker and Izzy can beat anyone from any time, they are the two clear best MWs of this generation and I agree that in the grand scheme of things the sport gets better (not necesarily in UFC alone, or not at the same ratio, than in MMA as a whole)
We can be closer in our views than I think but while I dont agree with Fitch regarding "overall ability" as he calls it, I do agree he has a point regarding grappling and the promoter's inffluence. I just think you take for granted certain skills in this "modern" fighters where I dont see such evidence or not to the same extent
I think Brunson has improved a reasonable amount at Sanford personally. Possibly not so much in terms of skillset but imo for sure in terms of fight IQ. He used to blitz forward a lot irresponsibly and get countered the shit out of but he's much more measured nowadays and much more focused on using his wrestling and heavy ground and pound to get the job done rather than thinking he's this KO artist.
You might be right and I guess we will see where Derek stands vs Canonier.
Nodody followed the steps of David Branch who outwrestled Jared in the 1st round of their fight but again, has he been tested much further in that department? I dont write off Brunson in this one, let's see if he shows that improved IQ, definitely shoult not play to be the KO artist in this one.