Social ICE/deportation protests and riots megathread
- Thread starter cottagecheesefan
- Start date
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2015
- Messages
- 16,928
- Reaction score
- 13,791
I'm curious meow, no worries either way though if you don't wanna do another
Profile of the Poster
1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis
Category Assessment Politeness Low to moderate; tone is biting and sarcastic, but not overtly hostile without provocation Kindness Low on surface warmth, but underlying empathy appears in defense of vulnerable groups Anger Moderate to high; especially when engaging with perceived injustice, hypocrisy, or authoritarian overreach Tone Witty, sardonic, passionate, and frequently exasperated with bad-faith arguments Empathy Demonstrates strong concern for civil rights, healthcare access, and humane immigration policy
2. Intelligence Estimation
- Language Use: Highly articulate, with creative use of sarcasm and analogy. Swears occasionally, but thoughtfully.
- Argumentation: Consistently asks for evidence, legal clarity, and logical consistency. Pushes debates into specific, defensible terms.
- Analytical Depth: Engages deeply with legal frameworks, systemic power structures, and policy implications. Separates emotion from legality when needed.
Ideological Orientation
Left–Right Spectrum
Evidence Leaning Strong criticism of Trump, MAGA, right-wing rhetoric Left Advocates for universal healthcare, immigrant protections, and child rights Progressive left Opposes authoritarian and corporate overreach in government Left-populist lens Disgusted by bad-faith defenses and moral relativism Ethically motivated leftism
Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum
Evidence Leaning Emphasis on individual liberty and constitutional protection Libertarian-leaning Deep skepticism of concentrated executive power Libertarian Opposition to death penalty, forced deportations, and performative judicial rulings Anti-authoritarian Consistent with values of personal rights and limits on government interference Libertarian ethics
Archetype Match
Summary Table
Trait Assessment Politeness Low to moderate (cutting, not cruel) Rudeness/Kindness Confrontational but morally grounded Anger Level High – directed toward injustice Intellectual Depth High; excels in argument and nuance Political Leaning Progressive Left Authority Preference Libertarian
- Joined
- May 27, 2009
- Messages
- 37,077
- Reaction score
- 38,308
It’s a constitutional crisis it must be stopped
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2011
- Messages
- 4,571
- Reaction score
- 2,184
Bro what the fuck are we doing hereI was curious how intense @Koro_11 's rhetoric has been, so I dug up the last 5 pages of searchs and filtered to War Room only. I then passed this to ChatGPT to analyse the sentiment.
Here it is.
1. Sentiment Analysis
- Tone: Aggressive, confrontational, sarcastic
- Emotion: Anger, contempt, disdain are dominant.
- Politeness: Very low. Language is crude, dismissive, and often hostile.
- Kindness vs Rudeness: Strongly rude and antagonistic; insults are direct and frequent. The poster displays:
- Personal attacks: “clown,” “emo cuck,” “dishonest rat”
- Profanity: “shut the fuck up,” “fucking high school girl,” “bitch”
- Mocking tone: frequent ridicule of others’ viewpoints
2. Intelligence (Estimated via Language & Reasoning)
- Style: The poster demonstrates familiarity with political topics (e.g., immigration policy, blasphemy laws, Middle Eastern conflicts, US foreign aid, etc.).
- Vocabulary: Informal and profanity-laced, but coherent. Points are sometimes structured with cause-effect logic or rhetorical questions.
- Critical Thinking: There is a clear ideological filter, but some posts suggest a basic-to-moderate grasp of nuanced issues (e.g., distinction between legal/illegal immigration, blasphemy laws applied unequally).
- Estimated Range: Average to slightly above average intelligence, hindered in expression by emotionally charged delivery and lack of self-moderation.
1. Left–Right Spectrum:
- Strongly Right-wing
- Anti-“woke” sentiment (references to “LGBT garbage,” “indoctrination”)
- Opposition to illegal immigration
- Support for law enforcement use of force
- Dismissive toward trans rights (“once you tell me a man is a woman…”)
- References to “soyboy” and “clown world” – common alt-right or anti-progressive slang
2. Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum:
- Moderate Authoritarian
- Supports state use of force in protests (“rubber bullets” acceptable, asks for solutions to violent rioting)
- Supports blasphemy laws if applied “equally” but is not personally in favor of them
- Wants restrictions on porn for minors, but not outright bans
- Does not call for complete government control, but supports enforcement of order and traditional values
Trait Assessment Politeness Very low; overtly hostile Kindness Low; deliberately mocking and demeaning Emotional Tone Predominantly angry, defensive, and disdainful Rhetorical Style Adversarial, sarcastic, and combative Cognitive Ability Reasonably informed, but clouded by heavy bias and emotional reactivity Political Leaning Far Right, Moderate Authoritarian
- Joined
- May 27, 2009
- Messages
- 37,077
- Reaction score
- 38,308
You should be banned for being such a weirdoI was curious how intense @Koro_11 's rhetoric has been, so I dug up the last 5 pages of searchs and filtered to War Room only. I then passed this to ChatGPT to analyse the sentiment.
Here it is.
1. Sentiment Analysis
- Tone: Aggressive, confrontational, sarcastic
- Emotion: Anger, contempt, disdain are dominant.
- Politeness: Very low. Language is crude, dismissive, and often hostile.
- Kindness vs Rudeness: Strongly rude and antagonistic; insults are direct and frequent. The poster displays:
- Personal attacks: “clown,” “emo cuck,” “dishonest rat”
- Profanity: “shut the fuck up,” “fucking high school girl,” “bitch”
- Mocking tone: frequent ridicule of others’ viewpoints
2. Intelligence (Estimated via Language & Reasoning)
- Style: The poster demonstrates familiarity with political topics (e.g., immigration policy, blasphemy laws, Middle Eastern conflicts, US foreign aid, etc.).
- Vocabulary: Informal and profanity-laced, but coherent. Points are sometimes structured with cause-effect logic or rhetorical questions.
- Critical Thinking: There is a clear ideological filter, but some posts suggest a basic-to-moderate grasp of nuanced issues (e.g., distinction between legal/illegal immigration, blasphemy laws applied unequally).
- Estimated Range: Average to slightly above average intelligence, hindered in expression by emotionally charged delivery and lack of self-moderation.
1. Left–Right Spectrum:
- Strongly Right-wing
- Anti-“woke” sentiment (references to “LGBT garbage,” “indoctrination”)
- Opposition to illegal immigration
- Support for law enforcement use of force
- Dismissive toward trans rights (“once you tell me a man is a woman…”)
- References to “soyboy” and “clown world” – common alt-right or anti-progressive slang
2. Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum:
- Moderate Authoritarian
- Supports state use of force in protests (“rubber bullets” acceptable, asks for solutions to violent rioting)
- Supports blasphemy laws if applied “equally” but is not personally in favor of them
- Wants restrictions on porn for minors, but not outright bans
- Does not call for complete government control, but supports enforcement of order and traditional values
Trait Assessment Politeness Very low; overtly hostile Kindness Low; deliberately mocking and demeaning Emotional Tone Predominantly angry, defensive, and disdainful Rhetorical Style Adversarial, sarcastic, and combative Cognitive Ability Reasonably informed, but clouded by heavy bias and emotional reactivity Political Leaning Far Right, Moderate Authoritarian
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2023
- Messages
- 11,044
- Reaction score
- 17,828
So a dozen or so, that's the MS Media and MS N Bee Sea's narrative DB?
Ya gotta remember, ain't no Riots like SancCity Riots.
Ya gotta remember, ain't no Riots like SancCity Riots.
That video was a real crisis actor classic.
When that cop's pistol went off - it was clear AF pointed at the ceiling.
Pick a new hoax LP, that Pelosi "KeepTrumpOut" Plan failed like the dem's Kamala Harris campain.
Video after video shows police leading crisis actors like HornyMan LARPing with the non-violent hundreds of thousands of Actual Peaceful Protesters.
Yeah SR,Tell 'em all about that damn climate change. Video at, umm, now.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2006
- Messages
- 9,165
- Reaction score
- 9,296
not really
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
- Messages
- 31,703
- Reaction score
- 24,733
Oh, right, "migrants" and "maryland dads"
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2023
- Messages
- 11,044
- Reaction score
- 17,828
That was actually cool AF idea Neph, from concept to end result.
Like that inedible steak..Well Done.
Haven't read all of his result - yet - but again, good job.
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 3,974
- Reaction score
- 3,784
@ShadowRun
Profile of the Poster
1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis
| Category | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Politeness | Low. The tone is mocking, dismissive, and reactive; often uses ridicule or sarcasm to push back on others. |
| Kindness | Minimal. Offers very little emotional empathy or support. Primarily interested in dunking or quipping. |
| Anger | Low-to-moderate. The anger seems passive-aggressive or channeled through sarcasm and memes rather than overt... |
ChatGPT correctly identified you as a retard.
- Joined
- May 27, 2009
- Messages
- 37,077
- Reaction score
- 38,308
I wish you spammed this in more threads Mr NPC@ShadowRun
1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis
Category Assessment Politeness Low. The tone is mocking, dismissive, and reactive; often uses ridicule or sarcasm to push back on others. Kindness Minimal. Offers very little emotional empathy or support. Primarily interested in dunking or quipping. Anger Low-to-moderate. The anger seems passive-aggressive or channeled through sarcasm and memes rather than overt...
ChatGPT correctly identified you as a retard.
- Neph posts on Sherdog.
- The poster appears to be a non-playable character (NPC).
- Lacks original opinions or thoughts.
- Responses seem scripted or repetitive.
- Engages in discussions without personal insights.
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 15, 2022
- Messages
- 7,094
- Reaction score
- 6,801
Good to know there's a president who is willing to deploy the military immediately to qwell a riot ... as oposed to deploying RIOT POLICE.
The military should not be deployed imediately because they are not trained to control and disperse crowds with the aim of minimising damage. Completely different strategies are involed and if you have ever actually watched riot police in action their methods are pretty effective and cordinated.
The military should not be deployed imediately because they are not trained to control and disperse crowds with the aim of minimising damage. Completely different strategies are involed and if you have ever actually watched riot police in action their methods are pretty effective and cordinated.
- Joined
- May 27, 2009
- Messages
- 37,077
- Reaction score
- 38,308
lol no you can manipulate ChatGPT to be bias easily . Even have it leak SSN’s. It all depends on what what you ask and how you ask it things .
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2023
- Messages
- 11,044
- Reaction score
- 17,828
Yo Neph,
Finished reading all of his results - interesting stuff.
Would ya throw down on mine when ya get a chance?
Thanks in advance.,,not sure how it'll be handled if it points at teh ghey...
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2016
- Messages
- 4,909
- Reaction score
- 7,493
@ShadowRun
1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis
Category Assessment Politeness Low. The tone is mocking, dismissive, and reactive; often uses ridicule or sarcasm to push back on others. Kindness Minimal. Offers very little emotional empathy or support. Primarily interested in dunking or quipping. Anger Low-to-moderate. The anger seems passive-aggressive or channeled through sarcasm and memes rather than overt...
ChatGPT correctly identified you as a retard.
Lol what's the prompt and can you do mine haha
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2022
- Messages
- 12,913
- Reaction score
- 35,056
I would classify them as foreign invaders at this point. The restraint to not let these people find out while fucking around this long is admirable.
- Joined
- May 27, 2009
- Messages
- 37,077
- Reaction score
- 38,308
Based on the available data from the Sherdog forums and a related X post for the user “nonoob” (@NoNoKnowSo on X), their posting style reveals several shortcomings and instances of non-logical thought. Here’s a summary focusing on these aspects:
1 Lack of Coherent Reasoning: Nonoob’s posts often lack substantive arguments or evidence to support their claims. For instance, their X post criticizes government actions as authoritarian and expresses strong views on immigration (“remove illegals”), but provides no reasoning or data to back these assertions. This reliance on blunt statements without elaboration reflects a failure to engage in logical discourse.
2 Contradictory or Vague Positions: The user’s political stance appears inconsistent or poorly defined. They express a desire for free speech and distrust of government, yet their rejection of “the resistance” in the same breath is ambiguous and lacks context, making it difficult to discern a clear ideological framework. This vagueness undermines the logical coherence of their views.
3 Provocative Over Substance: Nonoob’s contributions, particularly on Sherdog, lean toward provocative or humorous remarks rather than meaningful discussion. For example, their comment about being part of the “kingdom of Jehovah” but dismissing door-to-door proselytizing as “bs” suggests a flippant attitude that prioritizes shock or humor over reasoned dialogue, contributing to the perception of silliness.
4 Failure to Engage with Counterpoints: There’s no evidence in the provided data that nonoob addresses opposing views or engages in constructive debate. Their posts appear one-dimensional, focusing on expressing personal sentiments without acknowledging or responding to alternative perspectives, which is a hallmark of non-logical thought.
5 Overgeneralization and Emotional Appeals: Their stance on immigration, as seen in the X post, uses broad, emotionally charged terms like “illegals” without nuance or policy discussion. This oversimplification ignores complex social and economic factors, reflecting a reliance on emotional rhetoric over logical analysis.
In summary, nonoob’s shortcomings include a lack of coherent reasoning, inconsistent or vague positions, and a tendency toward provocative, unsubstantiated statements. Their posts prioritize emotional or humorous impact over logical structure, failing to engage with counterpoints or provide evidence, which aligns with the characterization of their content as “silly” and non-logical. The limited data available restricts deeper analysis, but the pattern suggests a preference for attention-grabbing over reasoned discourse.
Similar threads
