• We are currently experiencing technical difficulties. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

Social ICE/deportation protests and riots megathread

🧠 Profile of the Poster


1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis

CategoryAssessment
PolitenessLow to moderate; tone is biting and sarcastic, but not overtly hostile without provocation
KindnessLow on surface warmth, but underlying empathy appears in defense of vulnerable groups
AngerModerate to high; especially when engaging with perceived injustice, hypocrisy, or authoritarian overreach
ToneWitty, sardonic, passionate, and frequently exasperated with bad-faith arguments
EmpathyDemonstrates strong concern for civil rights, healthcare access, and humane immigration policy


2. Intelligence Estimation

  • Language Use: Highly articulate, with creative use of sarcasm and analogy. Swears occasionally, but thoughtfully.
  • Argumentation: Consistently asks for evidence, legal clarity, and logical consistency. Pushes debates into specific, defensible terms.
  • Analytical Depth: Engages deeply with legal frameworks, systemic power structures, and policy implications. Separates emotion from legality when needed.


🧭 Ideological Orientation

Left–Right Spectrum

EvidenceLeaning
Strong criticism of Trump, MAGA, right-wing rhetoricLeft
Advocates for universal healthcare, immigrant protections, and child rightsProgressive left
Opposes authoritarian and corporate overreach in governmentLeft-populist lens
Disgusted by bad-faith defenses and moral relativismEthically motivated leftism


Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum

EvidenceLeaning
Emphasis on individual liberty and constitutional protectionLibertarian-leaning
Deep skepticism of concentrated executive powerLibertarian
Opposition to death penalty, forced deportations, and performative judicial rulingsAnti-authoritarian
Consistent with values of personal rights and limits on government interferenceLibertarian ethics


🎭 Archetype Match



⚖️ Summary Table

TraitAssessment
PolitenessLow to moderate (cutting, not cruel)
Rudeness/KindnessConfrontational but morally grounded
Anger LevelHigh – directed toward injustice
Intellectual DepthHigh; excels in argument and nuance
Political LeaningProgressive Left
Authority PreferenceLibertarian
I'm curious meow, no worries either way though if you don't wanna do another
 
Glad someone has the courage to stand up to these masked no-badge gestapo agents abducting people all over the country

Illegal deportations with no trial = citizens need to stand up to it
It’s a constitutional crisis it must be stopped
 
Oh damn, if my liberal, Islamic minded country stood up and enforced the removal of illegals I’d be proud tbf.

Good job team ICE. Rock on.
 
I was curious how intense @Koro_11 's rhetoric has been, so I dug up the last 5 pages of searchs and filtered to War Room only. I then passed this to ChatGPT to analyse the sentiment.

Here it is.

🧠 Profile of the Poster

1. Sentiment Analysis

  • Tone: Aggressive, confrontational, sarcastic
  • Emotion: Anger, contempt, disdain are dominant.
  • Politeness: Very low. Language is crude, dismissive, and often hostile.
  • Kindness vs Rudeness: Strongly rude and antagonistic; insults are direct and frequent. The poster displays:
    • Personal attacks: “clown,” “emo cuck,” “dishonest rat”
    • Profanity: “shut the fuck up,” “fucking high school girl,” “bitch”
    • Mocking tone: frequent ridicule of others’ viewpoints

2. Intelligence (Estimated via Language & Reasoning)

  • Style: The poster demonstrates familiarity with political topics (e.g., immigration policy, blasphemy laws, Middle Eastern conflicts, US foreign aid, etc.).
  • Vocabulary: Informal and profanity-laced, but coherent. Points are sometimes structured with cause-effect logic or rhetorical questions.
  • Critical Thinking: There is a clear ideological filter, but some posts suggest a basic-to-moderate grasp of nuanced issues (e.g., distinction between legal/illegal immigration, blasphemy laws applied unequally).
  • Estimated Range: Average to slightly above average intelligence, hindered in expression by emotionally charged delivery and lack of self-moderation.

🧭 Political Ideological Orientation

1. Left–Right Spectrum:

  • Strongly Right-wing
    • Anti-“woke” sentiment (references to “LGBT garbage,” “indoctrination”)
    • Opposition to illegal immigration
    • Support for law enforcement use of force
    • Dismissive toward trans rights (“once you tell me a man is a woman…”)
    • References to “soyboy” and “clown world” – common alt-right or anti-progressive slang

2. Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum:

  • Moderate Authoritarian
    • Supports state use of force in protests (“rubber bullets” acceptable, asks for solutions to violent rioting)
    • Supports blasphemy laws if applied “equally” but is not personally in favor of them
    • Wants restrictions on porn for minors, but not outright bans
    • Does not call for complete government control, but supports enforcement of order and traditional values

⚖️ Summary of Traits

TraitAssessment
PolitenessVery low; overtly hostile
KindnessLow; deliberately mocking and demeaning
Emotional TonePredominantly angry, defensive, and disdainful
Rhetorical StyleAdversarial, sarcastic, and combative
Cognitive AbilityReasonably informed, but clouded by heavy bias and emotional reactivity
Political LeaningFar Right, Moderate Authoritarian
Bro what the fuck are we doing here
 
I was curious how intense @Koro_11 's rhetoric has been, so I dug up the last 5 pages of searchs and filtered to War Room only. I then passed this to ChatGPT to analyse the sentiment.

Here it is.

🧠 Profile of the Poster

1. Sentiment Analysis

  • Tone: Aggressive, confrontational, sarcastic
  • Emotion: Anger, contempt, disdain are dominant.
  • Politeness: Very low. Language is crude, dismissive, and often hostile.
  • Kindness vs Rudeness: Strongly rude and antagonistic; insults are direct and frequent. The poster displays:
    • Personal attacks: “clown,” “emo cuck,” “dishonest rat”
    • Profanity: “shut the fuck up,” “fucking high school girl,” “bitch”
    • Mocking tone: frequent ridicule of others’ viewpoints

2. Intelligence (Estimated via Language & Reasoning)

  • Style: The poster demonstrates familiarity with political topics (e.g., immigration policy, blasphemy laws, Middle Eastern conflicts, US foreign aid, etc.).
  • Vocabulary: Informal and profanity-laced, but coherent. Points are sometimes structured with cause-effect logic or rhetorical questions.
  • Critical Thinking: There is a clear ideological filter, but some posts suggest a basic-to-moderate grasp of nuanced issues (e.g., distinction between legal/illegal immigration, blasphemy laws applied unequally).
  • Estimated Range: Average to slightly above average intelligence, hindered in expression by emotionally charged delivery and lack of self-moderation.

🧭 Political Ideological Orientation

1. Left–Right Spectrum:

  • Strongly Right-wing
    • Anti-“woke” sentiment (references to “LGBT garbage,” “indoctrination”)
    • Opposition to illegal immigration
    • Support for law enforcement use of force
    • Dismissive toward trans rights (“once you tell me a man is a woman…”)
    • References to “soyboy” and “clown world” – common alt-right or anti-progressive slang

2. Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum:

  • Moderate Authoritarian
    • Supports state use of force in protests (“rubber bullets” acceptable, asks for solutions to violent rioting)
    • Supports blasphemy laws if applied “equally” but is not personally in favor of them
    • Wants restrictions on porn for minors, but not outright bans
    • Does not call for complete government control, but supports enforcement of order and traditional values

⚖️ Summary of Traits

TraitAssessment
PolitenessVery low; overtly hostile
KindnessLow; deliberately mocking and demeaning
Emotional TonePredominantly angry, defensive, and disdainful
Rhetorical StyleAdversarial, sarcastic, and combative
Cognitive AbilityReasonably informed, but clouded by heavy bias and emotional reactivity
Political LeaningFar Right, Moderate Authoritarian
You should be banned for being such a weirdo
 
By the looks of the live footage the local news showed an hour ago, about a dozen or so people near a single Home Depot.

You honestly think that qualifies as a violent insurrection, as the administration claims?
So a dozen or so, that's the MS Media and MS N Bee Sea's narrative DB?

Ya gotta remember, ain't no Riots like SancCity Riots.​



You guys celebrate Ashlii Babbit getting shot all the time...

That video was a real crisis actor classic.
When that cop's pistol went off - it was clear AF pointed at the ceiling.

you forget when these crybabies stormed the capitol to thwart an election? How about that, huh?

Pick a new hoax LP, that Pelosi "KeepTrumpOut" Plan failed like the dem's Kamala Harris campain.


Video after video shows police leading crisis actors like HornyMan LARPing with the non-violent hundreds of thousands of Actual Peaceful Protesters.


Well the only reasons fire exist now is because of climate change, if you just would pay more taxes this wouldn’t be happening
Yeah SR,Tell 'em all about that damn climate change. Video at, umm, now.

 
Last edited:
I was curious how intense @Koro_11 's rhetoric has been, so I dug up the last 5 pages of searchs and filtered to War Room only. I then passed this to ChatGPT to analyse the sentiment.

Here it is.

That was actually cool AF idea Neph, from concept to end result.

Like that inedible steak..Well Done.​

Haven't read all of his result - yet - but again, good job. :)
 
You should be banned for being such a weirdo

ChatGPT correctly identified you as a retard.
 

ChatGPT correctly identified you as a retard.
I wish you spammed this in more threads Mr NPC


- Neph posts on Sherdog.
- The poster appears to be a non-playable character (NPC).
- Lacks original opinions or thoughts.
- Responses seem scripted or repetitive.
- Engages in discussions without personal insights.
 
Last edited:
Good to know there's a president who is willing to deploy the military immediately to qwell a riot ... as oposed to deploying RIOT POLICE.

The military should not be deployed imediately because they are not trained to control and disperse crowds with the aim of minimising damage. Completely different strategies are involed and if you have ever actually watched riot police in action their methods are pretty effective and cordinated.
 
I'm curious meow, no worries either way though if you don't wanna do another
lol no you can manipulate ChatGPT to be bias easily . Even have it leak SSN’s. It all depends on what what you ask and how you ask it things .
 
ChatGPT correctly identified you as a retard.
Yo Neph,
Finished reading all of his results - interesting stuff.

Would ya throw down on mine when ya get a chance?
Thanks in advance.,,not sure how it'll be handled if it points at teh ghey...
 

ChatGPT correctly identified you as a retard.

Lol what's the prompt and can you do mine haha
 
Last edited:
Good to know there's a president who is willing to deploy the military immediately to qwell a riot ... as oposed to deploying RIOT POLICE.

The military should not be deployed imediately because they are not trained to control and disperse crowds with the aim of minimising damage. Completely different strategies are involed and if you have ever actually watched riot police in action their methods are pretty effective and cordinated.
I would classify them as foreign invaders at this point. The restraint to not let these people find out while fucking around this long is admirable.

 
Yo Neph,
Finished reading all of his results - interesting stuff.

Would ya throw down on mine when ya get a chance?
Thanks in advance.,,not sure how it'll be handled if it points at teh ghey...
Based on the available data from the Sherdog forums and a related X post for the user “nonoob” (@NoNoKnowSo on X), their posting style reveals several shortcomings and instances of non-logical thought. Here’s a summary focusing on these aspects:
1 Lack of Coherent Reasoning: Nonoob’s posts often lack substantive arguments or evidence to support their claims. For instance, their X post criticizes government actions as authoritarian and expresses strong views on immigration (“remove illegals”), but provides no reasoning or data to back these assertions. This reliance on blunt statements without elaboration reflects a failure to engage in logical discourse.
2 Contradictory or Vague Positions: The user’s political stance appears inconsistent or poorly defined. They express a desire for free speech and distrust of government, yet their rejection of “the resistance” in the same breath is ambiguous and lacks context, making it difficult to discern a clear ideological framework. This vagueness undermines the logical coherence of their views.
3 Provocative Over Substance: Nonoob’s contributions, particularly on Sherdog, lean toward provocative or humorous remarks rather than meaningful discussion. For example, their comment about being part of the “kingdom of Jehovah” but dismissing door-to-door proselytizing as “bs” suggests a flippant attitude that prioritizes shock or humor over reasoned dialogue, contributing to the perception of silliness.
4 Failure to Engage with Counterpoints: There’s no evidence in the provided data that nonoob addresses opposing views or engages in constructive debate. Their posts appear one-dimensional, focusing on expressing personal sentiments without acknowledging or responding to alternative perspectives, which is a hallmark of non-logical thought.
5 Overgeneralization and Emotional Appeals: Their stance on immigration, as seen in the X post, uses broad, emotionally charged terms like “illegals” without nuance or policy discussion. This oversimplification ignores complex social and economic factors, reflecting a reliance on emotional rhetoric over logical analysis.
In summary, nonoob’s shortcomings include a lack of coherent reasoning, inconsistent or vague positions, and a tendency toward provocative, unsubstantiated statements. Their posts prioritize emotional or humorous impact over logical structure, failing to engage with counterpoints or provide evidence, which aligns with the characterization of their content as “silly” and non-logical. The limited data available restricts deeper analysis, but the pattern suggests a preference for attention-grabbing over reasoned discourse.
 
Back
Top