- Joined
- Apr 17, 2022
- Messages
- 1,136
- Reaction score
- 3,482
Ian Garry's performance against Neil Magny was lacklustre. Here's why.
Garry couldn't finish a one-legged Magny. His "kicks" were really just >>>foot sweeps<<< that did NO damage to Magny. A fight is all about damage, and if this was a street fight - which is the purest form of fighting - Garry would have lost, MISERABLY.
I don't agree that Ian "beat" Garry. Magny did not have a full training camp. Garry did. In a rematch, the outcome would be **catastrophically** different.
When Magny did land significant strikes, they were crisper, fuller, juicier, more plump.
Out of all the "dominations" I've seen in MMA (been watching far before UFC 1), this has got to be one of the most MISTERleading.
Garry couldn't finish a one-legged Magny. His "kicks" were really just >>>foot sweeps<<< that did NO damage to Magny. A fight is all about damage, and if this was a street fight - which is the purest form of fighting - Garry would have lost, MISERABLY.
I don't agree that Ian "beat" Garry. Magny did not have a full training camp. Garry did. In a rematch, the outcome would be **catastrophically** different.
When Magny did land significant strikes, they were crisper, fuller, juicier, more plump.
Out of all the "dominations" I've seen in MMA (been watching far before UFC 1), this has got to be one of the most MISTERleading.

