• We are currently experiencing technical difficulties. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

Ian Garry = BARELY won against Neil Magny

big franklin

franklin
@Green
Joined
Apr 17, 2022
Messages
1,136
Reaction score
3,482
Ian Garry's performance against Neil Magny was lacklustre. Here's why.

Garry couldn't finish a one-legged Magny. His "kicks" were really just >>>foot sweeps<<< that did NO damage to Magny. A fight is all about damage, and if this was a street fight - which is the purest form of fighting - Garry would have lost, MISERABLY.

I don't agree that Ian "beat" Garry. Magny did not have a full training camp. Garry did. In a rematch, the outcome would be **catastrophically** different.

When Magny did land significant strikes, they were crisper, fuller, juicier, more plump.

Out of all the "dominations" I've seen in MMA (been watching far before UFC 1), this has got to be one of the most MISTERleading.
 
Garry has no killer instinct but he methodically broke down Magny and offered him not a second of offence. Magny is the ultimate gatekeeper so for him to show absolutely nothing for Garry is a big deal.

The real eye opener will be Wonderboy.. I hope he takes that fight. Garry is annoying cocky kid but he's definitely talented with a high ceiling at 25 years old.
 
ABSOLUTELY OUTRAGEOUS!

wwe-triple-h.gif


 
Magny is just a jobber at this point. They almost say so on the commentary, calling guys like him and Brunson, Tavaras, and other journeymen a "test" in the division for other fighters. If you're called a test in the UFC it means you're not the one taking the test, meaning you're a bum in their eyes.
 
Back
Top