- Joined
- Sep 30, 2016
- Messages
- 44,844
- Reaction score
- 80,721
What about the Secular Right, like me?
What is globalism, and who are the globalists? You bitches never explain your confident usage of proposing this nebulous grouping rules the world........
Not working for me, can you give a brief summary in your own words?See if this link works. https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-b3675fdbca6bda976b103e5592a3e076.webp just shows the spectrum of biological sex alone.
Not working for me, can you give a brief summary in your own words?
should work.
No, Libeniz. Cultures aren't static.Lol. Really?
So... all cultures around the world are presently the best they have ever been?
Thank you for adding that. It should probably show up in every thread where people are going on about marxists, socialism, and 18th-20th Century European values.The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (French: Déclaration des droits de l'homme et du citoyen de 1789), set by France's National Constituent Assembly in 1789, is a human civil rights document from the French Revolution.
The Declaration was drafted in consultation with Thomas Jefferson. Influenced by the doctrine of natural right, the rights of man are held to be universal: valid at all times and in every place, pertaining to human nature itself. It became the basis for a nation of free individuals protected equally by the law.
Inspired by the Enlightenment philosophers and writers, the Declaration was a core statement of the values of the French Revolution and had a major impact on the development of freedom and democracy in Europe and worldwide.
The following 1791 penal code did not enforce Christian morality; there were, for example, no prohibitions against consensual same-sex activity between adults (this being the first Western code of law to decriminalize such conduct since Classical Antiquity). It was presented to the Constituent Assembly stating it "would only punish true crimes, not the artificial offenses condemned by superstition."[1][2][3][4][5]
Article I – Men are born and remain free and equal in rights. Social distinctions can be founded only on the common good.
Article II – The goal of any political association is the conservation of the natural and imprescriptible rights of man. These rights are liberty, property, safety and resistance against oppression.
Article III – The principle of any sovereignty resides essentially in the Nation. No body, no individual may exercise any authority which does not proceed directly from the nation.
Article IV – Liberty consists of doing anything which does not harm others: thus, the exercise of the natural rights of each man has only those borders which assure other members of the society the fruition of these same rights.
Article V – The law has the right to forbid only actions harmful to society. Anything which is not forbidden by the law cannot be impeded, and no one can be constrained to do what it does not order.
Article VI – The law is the expression of the general will. All the citizens have the right of contributing personally or through their representatives to its formation. It must be the same for all, either that it protects, or that it punishes. All the citizens, being equal in its eyes, are equally admissible to all public dignities, places, and employments, according to their capacity and without distinction other than that of their virtues and of their talents.
Article VII – No man can be accused, arrested nor detained but in the cases determined by the law, and according to the forms which it has prescribed. Those who solicit, dispatch, carry out or cause to be carried out arbitrary orders, must be punished; but any citizen called or seized under the terms of the law must obey at once; he renders himself culpable by resistance.
Article VIII – The law should establish only penalties that are strictly and evidently necessary, and no one can be punished but under a law established and promulgated before the offense and legally applied.
Article IX – Any man being presumed innocent until he is declared culpable if it is judged indispensable to arrest him, any rigor which would not be necessary for the securing of his person must be severely reprimanded by the law.
Article X – No one may be disturbed for his opinions, even religious ones, provided that their manifestation does not trouble the public order established by the law.
Article XI – The free communication of thoughts and of opinions is one of the most precious rights of man: any citizen thus may speak, write, and print freely.
Article XII – The guarantee of the rights of man and of the citizen necessitates a public force: this force is thus instituted for the advantage of all and not for the particular utility of those in whom it is trusted.
Article XIII – For the maintenance of the public force and for the expenditures of administration, a common contribution is indispensable; it must be equally distributed to all the citizens, according to their ability to pay.
Article XIV – Each citizen has the right to ascertain, by himself or through his representatives, the need for a public tax, to consent to it freely, to know the uses to which it is put, and of determining the proportion, basis, collection, and duration.
Article XV – The society has the right of requesting an account from any public agent of its administration.
Article XVI – Any society in which the guarantee of rights is not assured, nor the separation of powers determined, has no Constitution.
Article XVII – Property being an inviolable and sacred right, no one can be deprived of private usage, if it is not when the public necessity, legally noted, evidently requires it, and under the condition of a just and prior indemnity.
Oh he knows, he disagrees - big difference. Lol @ playing teacher, you think we haven't heard you idiots' rhetoric before? It's all over the place. By your logic, a stay-at-home husband needs to start identifying as female because he's taking on a traditionally female "gender role". You're the ones who are bigots, you pigeon-hole people into categories, you don't recognize that people of both sexes can take on a large range of activities.
I know you're shit posting, but "desirable" is subjective. Is "leftism" desirable compared to what and for whom?@Higus are you really saying that leftist culture is desirable? It's one of the most repulsive sights ever to behold, just look at the people that support it:
All raging lunatics![]()
![]()
In fact it's so bad you have to beat the population with accusations of racism and bigotry while brainwashing the youth in schools and through TV/Movies in order for it to gain traction. You have to threaten to ruin lives if people don't accept.
You really think leftism could survive all on its own? Leftism is tyranny wrapped up in a rainbow flag.
I know you're shit posting, but "desirable" is subjective. Is "leftism" desirable compared to what and for whom?
The reasonable left needs to smash them honestly. They are letting a select few twitter mob outraged 24x7 virtue signalers dictact what policies they want. This pushes people in the middle to the right who has Trump lol
You don't understand what I said about liberalism winning the culture war, but let's skip that for a moment.This leftist truly believes in his mind that I'm shit posting. This is how the leftist ideology protects itself inside its demented bubble.
You're implying in this thread that leftism won the culture war.
I'm telling you the reasons why it's prevalent in Western countries is because of those things I mentioned. Leftism couldn't survive on its own and it's why leftists implement dirty tactics. The worst of society latches on to it.
I wish we could, the crazy leftism that has corrupted the college's shutting down speech, calling for peoples job because they are offended and so on. Also the stupid extreme right white loving that has racist ties, who don't care about the climate at all and want to see gay's punished. There is a common middle ground, if we banded together and threw out the crazy minority on both sides we won't have another Trump. But for now we do and I rather have a Trump then a the options out thereI agree all the sane people need to come together to utterly destroy leftism. Hopefully this can be done through peaceful means.
Leftism is tyranny and it's out in the open about it.
Please defend whatever you think *should* be the prevailing culture. A real world example would be good.
I wish we could, the crazy leftism that has corrupted the college's shutting down speech, calling for peoples job because they are offended and so on. Also the stupid extreme right white loving that has racist ties, who don't care about the climate at all and want to see gay's punished. There is a common middle ground, if we banded together and threw out the crazy minority on both sides we won't have another Trump. But for now we do and I rather have a Trump then a the options out there
Ok, and how is that incompatible with culture today? Who is saying you shouldn't be able to raise a family or defend your property? Who is saying you shouldn't appreciate freedom or protect against tyranny?The culture of raising a family, being independent, self reliance and not relying on big government. The culture of being able to protect yourself, family and property without having to worry about that ability being taken away. The culture of appreciating and protecting freedom. The culture of protecting your nation and its people from any threat, outside influence and tyranny from within.
Ok, and how is that incompatible with culture today? Who is saying you shouldn't be able to raise a family or defend your property? Who is saying you shouldn't appreciate freedom or protect against tyranny?