• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Social How can the Secular Left be stopped?

Globalists is a catchall term used in conspiracy theories, like the ones you clearly take seriously. The globalist cabal is no different than the Illuminati.

I know what a globalist is supposed to be, I have just never heard anyone blaming the world's ills on them who can actually show how they're globalists, how they're coordinating, or what plans they have. It's all suggestion and CT, to be honest.

I take my dictation on the one world, indeed one universe government from the only authority on matters of state, The God Emperor Leto II Atreides.
joe-tuscany-godc.jpg

Sup

Ah, so you're mocking me. Well it's not a secretive, singular cabal, it's an ideology.
 
Dont be mad that you have no power to stop the progress. Just enjoy that this is the best time in human history, thank to all the previous progress we have made.
Wait - the far left marxists have been trying to end individualism and freedom since the French revolution?

I'm not a historian (@Limbo Pete) but I've always thought that the point of the French Revolution and similar revolutions was to grant more freedoms, both political and economic, to the individual.
Christian morality lol, nice oxymoron.

The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (French: Déclaration des droits de l'homme et du citoyen de 1789), set by France's National Constituent Assembly in 1789, is a human civil rights document from the French Revolution.

The Declaration was drafted in consultation with Thomas Jefferson. Influenced by the doctrine of natural right, the rights of man are held to be universal: valid at all times and in every place, pertaining to human nature itself. It became the basis for a nation of free individuals protected equally by the law.

Inspired by the Enlightenment philosophers and writers, the Declaration was a core statement of the values of the French Revolution and had a major impact on the development of freedom and democracy in Europe and worldwide.

The following 1791 penal code did not enforce Christian morality; there were, for example, no prohibitions against consensual same-sex activity between adults (this being the first Western code of law to decriminalize such conduct since Classical Antiquity). It was presented to the Constituent Assembly stating it "would only punish true crimes, not the artificial offenses condemned by superstition."[1][2][3][4][5]

Article I – Men are born and remain free and equal in rights. Social distinctions can be founded only on the common good.

Article II – The goal of any political association is the conservation of the natural and imprescriptible rights of man. These rights are liberty, property, safety and resistance against oppression.

Article III – The principle of any sovereignty resides essentially in the Nation. No body, no individual may exercise any authority which does not proceed directly from the nation.

Article IV – Liberty consists of doing anything which does not harm others: thus, the exercise of the natural rights of each man has only those borders which assure other members of the society the fruition of these same rights.

Article V – The law has the right to forbid only actions harmful to society. Anything which is not forbidden by the law cannot be impeded, and no one can be constrained to do what it does not order.

Article VI – The law is the expression of the general will. All the citizens have the right of contributing personally or through their representatives to its formation. It must be the same for all, either that it protects, or that it punishes. All the citizens, being equal in its eyes, are equally admissible to all public dignities, places, and employments, according to their capacity and without distinction other than that of their virtues and of their talents.

Article VII – No man can be accused, arrested nor detained but in the cases determined by the law, and according to the forms which it has prescribed. Those who solicit, dispatch, carry out or cause to be carried out arbitrary orders, must be punished; but any citizen called or seized under the terms of the law must obey at once; he renders himself culpable by resistance.

Article VIII – The law should establish only penalties that are strictly and evidently necessary, and no one can be punished but under a law established and promulgated before the offense and legally applied.

Article IX – Any man being presumed innocent until he is declared culpable if it is judged indispensable to arrest him, any rigor which would not be necessary for the securing of his person must be severely reprimanded by the law.

Article X – No one may be disturbed for his opinions, even religious ones, provided that their manifestation does not trouble the public order established by the law.

Article XI – The free communication of thoughts and of opinions is one of the most precious rights of man: any citizen thus may speak, write, and print freely.

Article XII – The guarantee of the rights of man and of the citizen necessitates a public force: this force is thus instituted for the advantage of all and not for the particular utility of those in whom it is trusted.

Article XIII – For the maintenance of the public force and for the expenditures of administration, a common contribution is indispensable; it must be equally distributed to all the citizens, according to their ability to pay.

Article XIV – Each citizen has the right to ascertain, by himself or through his representatives, the need for a public tax, to consent to it freely, to know the uses to which it is put, and of determining the proportion, basis, collection, and duration.

Article XV – The society has the right of requesting an account from any public agent of its administration.

Article XVI – Any society in which the guarantee of rights is not assured, nor the separation of powers determined, has no Constitution.

Article XVII – Property being an inviolable and sacred right, no one can be deprived of private usage, if it is not when the public necessity, legally noted, evidently requires it, and under the condition of a just and prior indemnity.
 
The left are so brainwashed or too stupid (probably both) to realize that they're being used by incredibly evil people.

They are so weak minded that they can be easily manipulated to support gun bans, drag kids, open borders style immigration, feminism and hatred for their own kind and country.



Here you have a liberal leader saying more diversity is a form of entropy. Entropy is a gradual decline into disorder. He learned that from his handlers.

The left are so fucking stupid they will still support diversity and thinks it's still a strength.
 
People on the right need to play that Justin Trudeau video more often. I'd suggest playing it as often as possible.

Trudeau the puppet fucked up and probably got shit from the higher ups for spilling the beans.

Demoralize, diversify, disarm.
 
*sigh*
If you want to go into the differences between sex and gender in an honest fashion, I’d be happy to continue in another thread. Otherwise, there are tons of places both here and other websites that will walk you through the differences with more patience than I can muster.
This is the typical type of leftist spin that I'm talking about.
You asked me to give you an example of the left's lies and attempt to control speech, and I gave you a clear example. If I say there are only 2 genders, that is now somehow offensive and I will be accused of hate speech and intolerance.

You think we need to be going over the differences between men and women? What does that even have to do with my argument?
 
Anecdotally every girl I've met likes Jordan Peterson or thinks he is a reasonable person - yes including liberal leaning women. And they don't get why he is lumped in with the far right.
 
*sigh*
If you want to go into the differences between sex and gender in an honest fashion, I’d be happy to continue in another thread. Otherwise, there are tons of places both here and other websites that will walk you through the differences with more patience than I can muster.

I’ve given up talking sex vs gender with people. It was too exhausting. Keep fighting the good fight.
 
This is the typical type of leftist spin that I'm talking about.
You asked me to give you an example of the left's lies and attempt to control speech, and I gave you a clear example. If I say there are only 2 genders, that is now somehow offensive and I will be accused of hate speech and intolerance.

You think we need to be going over the differences between men and women? What does that even have to do with my argument?

I can’t help myself.

You don’t know the difference between sex and gender do you? You are arguing that there are are two sexes, which in humans (barring rare genetic anomalies) is true. Gender is a social construct. That is why, among other things, men and women play different roles (family disciplinarian, head of family, etc.) in different cultures.
 
I can’t help myself.

You don’t know the difference between sex and gender do you? You are arguing that there are are two sexes, which in humans (barring rare genetic anomalies) is true. Gender is a social construct. That is why, among other things, men and women play different roles (family disciplinarian, head of family, etc.) in different cultures.
NextLikelyHyracotherium-size_restricted.gif
 
So the secular left has full control of silicon valley, our highest institutions of learning, Hollywood, helms globalism, and has control of all of our major news media except parts of fox news (for now).

Popular figures like Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro, Steven crowder, and other anti marxist anti leftist advocates are being targeted by leftist big tech and their corrupt media allies for extermination off social media platforms with no debate.

The term "Hate Speech" is being used by the elite left in such an Orwellian way that it almost boggles the mind.

Only our leftist silicon valley overlords seem to truly know what "hate speech" means and uses it to cut the tongues of people who criticize the righteous utopian narrative of the left......conservatives.

But nothing is new here, far left marxists have always placed their constant and bloody quest for utopia on earth over individualism and freedom. They've been at it since the French revolution.

If the left isn't stopped, eventually all society will be put under their totalitarian thumb. The marxist state will control literally everything. The Orwellian end goal.
I don't want to stop the secular left. I want to stop the socialist left.

The secular left has been a boon to this country.
 
Culture is a like a market place where the good things stay and the bad things go away.

Lol. Really?
So... all cultures around the world are presently the best they have ever been?
 
What do you think the left is going to to when it has full power in the west higus? Do you think the left will tolerate debate and alternative views?

What is the leftist controlled silicon valley slowly doing to its political rivals?

Liberal institutions cease to be liberal as soon as they are attained: later on, there are no worse and no more thorough injurers of freedom than liberal institutions.
- Friedrich Nietzsche
 
I can’t help myself.

You don’t know the difference between sex and gender do you? You are arguing that there are are two sexes, which in humans (barring rare genetic anomalies) is true. Gender is a social construct. That is why, among other things, men and women play different roles (family disciplinarian, head of family, etc.) in different cultures.

Oh he knows, he disagrees - big difference. Lol @ playing teacher, you think we haven't heard you idiots' rhetoric before? It's all over the place. By your logic, a stay-at-home husband needs to start identifying as female because he's taking on a traditionally female "gender role". You're the ones who are bigots, you pigeon-hole people into categories, you don't recognize that people of both sexes can take on a large range of activities.
 
This is the typical type of leftist spin that I'm talking about.
You asked me to give you an example of the left's lies and attempt to control speech, and I gave you a clear example. If I say there are only 2 genders, that is now somehow offensive and I will be accused of hate speech and intolerance.
You think we need to be going over the differences between men and women? What does that even have to do with my argument?


noun
  1. 1.
    either of the two sexes (male and female), especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones. The term is also used more broadly to denote a range of identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female.
    "a condition that affects people of both genders"



  2. 2.
    GRAMMAR
    (in languages such as Latin, French, and German) each of the classes (typically masculine, feminine, common, neuter) of nouns and pronouns distinguished by the different inflections which they have and which they require in words syntactically associated with them. Grammatical gender is only very loosely associated with natural distinctions of sex.


The World Health Organization:
Gender, typically described in terms of masculinity and femininity, is a social construction that varies across different cultures and over time. (6) There are a number of cultures, for example, in which greater gender diversity exists and sex and gender are not always neatly divided along binary lines such as male and female or homosexual and heterosexual. The Berdache in North America, the fa’afafine (Samoan for “the way of a woman”) in the Pacific, and the kathoey in Thailand are all examples of different gender categories that differ from the traditional Western division of people into males and females. Further, among certain North American native communities, gender is seen more in terms of a continuum than categories, with special acknowledgement of “two-spirited” people who encompass both masculine and feminine qualities and characteristics. It is apparent, then, that different cultures have taken different approaches to creating gender distinctions, with more or less recognition of fluidity and complexity of gender.[1]
 
noun
  1. 1.
    either of the two sexes (male and female), especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones. The term is also used more broadly to denote a range of identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female.
    "a condition that affects people of both genders"

  2. 2.
    GRAMMAR
    (in languages such as Latin, French, and German) each of the classes (typically masculine, feminine, common, neuter) of nouns and pronouns distinguished by the different inflections which they have and which they require in words syntactically associated with them. Grammatical gender is only very loosely associated with natural distinctions of sex.


The World Health Organization:
Gender, typically described in terms of masculinity and femininity, is a social construction that varies across different cultures and over time. (6) There are a number of cultures, for example, in which greater gender diversity exists and sex and gender are not always neatly divided along binary lines such as male and female or homosexual and heterosexual. The Berdache in North America, the fa’afafine (Samoan for “the way of a woman”) in the Pacific, and the kathoey in Thailand are all examples of different gender categories that differ from the traditional Western division of people into males and females. Further, among certain North American native communities, gender is seen more in terms of a continuum than categories, with special acknowledgement of “two-spirited” people who encompass both masculine and feminine qualities and characteristics. It is apparent, then, that different cultures have taken different approaches to creating gender distinctions, with more or less recognition of fluidity and complexity of gender.[1]
There are males, and there are females, the end.
 
Back
Top