Social How can the Secular Left be stopped?

Easiest way to defeat leftists is let them talk. The more they explain about their beliefs, the more reasonable, sane and moral people are disgusted and move to the right.

Reasonable people
The right

Pick one
 
“Conservatives freed the slaves.”

tenor.gif
To be fair he is wrong, it’s actually just white people who hold credit for that. Liberal or conservative is irrelevant, it was white people who outlawed it first in the world.
 
what the fuck are you talking about Limey?

In the most ambitious confederate military invasion the CONFEDERATE forces sought to take New Mexico to expand slavery from Texas to the west all the way to California. The UNION defeated this and effectively kept chattel Slavery, Jim Crow and racist ideology out of the west.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Mexico_Campaign

"If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that." ~ I wonder who said this...

<{1-1}>

<{1-1}>

Lincoln only wanted to preserve the union. Preserving = Conserve...

You fail, every single time.
 
Omg the big bad left omg, stop them !!!! Lul
 
Oh I agree with you, the left definiely won the culture war Higus. They won because the simply seized the higher institutions. They seized Hollywood and the colleges long ago and started whittling away at Christian morality in America.

"Culture is a like a market place where the good things stay and the bad things go away."

This is not neccesarily true....and besides that "good" and "bad" things concerning culture are entirely subjective.

What do you think the left is going to to when it has full power in the west higus? Do you think the left will tolerate debate and alternative views?

What is the leftist controlled silicon valley slowly doing to its political rivals?
Christian morality lol, nice oxymoron.

We've done this before, why can't the the right create their own popular social media platforms? Why because they turn into alt right, KKK, neo nazi circle jerks that pushes everyone away including advertisers and normal righties
 
Not to worry. These parasites can only do what they do when there is a healthy and functional civilization that has run its course and fallen into decadence. Once it collapses they will be eliminated.
 
Some people can't understand why their "side" is losing the culture war.
Culture is a like a market place where the good things stay and the bad things go away. The truth is not that the Secular Left is in cahoots to suppress the wonderful ideas of the Religious Right, but rather that the cultural verdict has been rendered long ago and folks like the TS can't accept the conclusion.

So you don't think a stranglehold on mainstream media is a propaganda advantage?
 
So the secular left has full control of silicon valley, our highest institutions of learning, Hollywood, helms globalism, and has control of all of our major news media except parts of fox news (for now).

Popular figures like Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro, Steven crowder, and other anti marxist anti leftist advocates are being targeted by leftist big tech and their corrupt media allies for extermination off social media platforms with no debate.

The term "Hate Speech" is being used by the elite left in such an Orwellian way that it almost boggles the mind.

Only our leftist silicon valley overlords seem to truly know what "hate speech" means and uses it to cut the tongues of people who criticize the righteous utopian narrative of the left......conservatives.

But nothing is new here, far left marxists have always placed their constant and bloody quest for utopia on earth over individualism and freedom. They've been at it since the French revolution.

If the left isn't stopped, eventually all society will be put under their totalitarian thumb. The marxist state will control literally everything. The Orwellian end goal.

There are so many fallacies and stupid assumptions in the OP that it is frustrating. How are we going to come to any kind of truth when you can be this biased? The red scare is just Paranoid Petersons mental illness bleeding through, the left don't own the media, it is and always will be to the RIGHT on economic issues because that means more profit for them and to the LEFT on social issues because that means profit for them.

People like Paranoid Peterson and the lying Shapiro who is being censored by a private company because he is shit and bad for profits are spreading dumb ideas. This is something the right ought to understand. The problem is a conundrum that is true-- but to blame this on a commie, Marxist, red scare, demonic reptilian, Jewish owning flat earth, is stupidity only the RIGHT could possible descend to.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Christian morality lol, nice oxymoron.

We've done this before, why can't the the right create their own popular social media platforms? Why because they turn into alt right, KKK, neo nazi circle jerks that pushes everyone away including advertisers and normal righties


This is absolutely true and it will happen to Paranoid Peterson's for profit platform too. It will be a sad sad circle jerk because no one will care that all the assholes went to the same platform. We will be glad to see them go.
 
So you don't think a stranglehold on mainstream media is a propaganda advantage?
You got it backwards. It’s not that the media is being controlled, it’s because the far right is toxic to advertisers. The “media” only cares about money.
 
Not if they were just minding their business, but if they’re pushing to indoctrinate my children with lies...
*sigh*
If you want to go into the differences between sex and gender in an honest fashion, I’d be happy to continue in another thread. Otherwise, there are tons of places both here and other websites that will walk you through the differences with more patience than I can muster.
 
You got it backwards. It’s not that the media is being controlled, it’s because the far right is toxic to advertisers. The “media” only cares about money.

Well that's true since more people watch Fox than CNN now. It did shift a bit and more eyes went to Fox so more advertisers and more money. But they also started becoming a bit more left leaning. So who knows? Maybe that's why they're doing better now. Donna Brazile for starters might have brought some corrupt DNC fans and donors over.
 
What is globalism, and who are the globalists? You bitches never explain your confident usage of proposing this nebulous grouping rules the world........

Assuming you're not trolling here, Globalists are people who believe more in internationalism as opposed to national sovereignty. They support and advocate for the expansion of things like the United Nations, World Trade Organization, the IMF, the World Bank, and the European Union. The eventual goal is the creation of a world government that presides over all the regional unions, or as they prefer to call it as it sounds less nefarious, "a one-world community."

Former National Security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski has written about it:

Zbigniew Brzezinski said:
Today we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational elites, but now they are composed of international businessmen, scholars, professional men, and public officials. The ties of these new elites cut across national boundaries, their perspectives are not confined by national traditions, and their interests are more functional than national. These global communities are gaining in strength and as was true in the Middle Ages, it is likely that before long the social elites of most of the more advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in spirit and outlook. The creation of the global information grid, facilitating almost continuous intellectual interaction and the pooling of knowledge, will further enhance the present trend toward international professional elites and toward the emergence of a common scientific language (in effect, the functional equivalent of Latin). This, how- ever, could create a dangerous gap between them and the politically activated masses, whose "nativism" —exploited by more nationalist political leaders — could work against the "cosmopolitan" elites.
 
Last edited:
Assuming you're not trolling here, Globalists are people who believe more in internationalism as opposed to national sovereignty. They support and advocate for the expansion of things like the United Nations, World Trade Organization, the IMF, and the World Bank, and the European Union. The eventual goal is the creation of a world government that presides over all the regional unions, or as they prefer to call it as it sounds less nefarious, "a one-world community."

So, who are they? Because as of now, you sound like some end times christian who knew Obama was the antichrist.

Hate to break it to you, but the "one world government" is coming, and you can't stop it. When human beings start taking planetary concerns higher than that of corporations and nation states, the one world government comes. And this isn't taking things like ai and robotics into account.
 
So, who are they? Because as of now, you sound like some end times christian who knew Obama was the antichrist.

They're proponents of globalism who prefer it to traditional notions of nationalism. For certain, most of the entire membership of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) are globalists, I would say. Most of the attendees of the annual Bilderberg conferences likely are as well. If you check their membership rosters you'll see that many Congressman, Governors, media personalities, academics, and business elites from across the political spectrum are there.

Hate to break it to you, but the "one world government" is coming, and you can't stop it. When human beings start taking planetary concerns higher than that of corporations and nation states, the one world government comes. And this isn't taking things like ai and robotics into account.

How do you know that? A second ago you didn't even know what a globalist was.
 
They're proponents of globalism who prefer it to traditional notions of nationalism. For certain, most of the entire membership of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) are globalists, I would say. Most of the attendees of the annual Bilderberg conferences likely are as well. If you check their membership rosters you'll see that many Congressman, Governors, media personalities, academics, and business elites from across the political spectrum are there.



How do you know that? A second ago you didn't even know what a globalist was.

Globalists is a catchall term used in conspiracy theories, like the ones you clearly take seriously. The globalist cabal is no different than the Illuminati.

I know what a globalist is supposed to be, I have just never heard anyone blaming the world's ills on them who can actually show how they're globalists, how they're coordinating, or what plans they have. It's all suggestion and CT, to be honest.

I take my dictation on the one world, indeed one universe government from the only authority on matters of state, The God Emperor Leto II Atreides.
joe-tuscany-godc.jpg

Sup
 
Back
Top