Crime Headlining Crime Megathread Vol. 2

[salamander]

Brave warrior of #ogun taking a stand (kneel) against wh*te supremacy

ipolongo ni ori rẹ nitori pe o jẹ ọta ati aṣiwere

#ogun

 

[brackis1]

You agreed with Crazy Joe's post and you were the one suggesting logic classes, so why wouldn't I target my comment at you?

Jesus how dumb are you?
Do I need to hold your hand thru this?
I pointed out that "Handsome Bruce" was arguing the exact same thing as Joe by stating he wasn't an authority on who gets to speak/define BLM. (A post which you eagerly 'liked' for some odd reason, despite it saying the same thing as Hungry Joe)

Show me where I agreed or endorsed anything besides calling the dude oblivious to his shitty reasoning and noting two people were saying the same thing to reach divergent conclusions lol.
Then you claimed Joe's post was such and such because you totally misread what I posted, then decided it was easier to potshot at me than actually make whatever the fuck your argument is.

So once again, if you wanna flex whatever your Scotsman argument is, go for it big man and argue with Hungry Joe about it.

 

[Deleted member 499399]

Maybe you could join him, because the argument Hungry Joe made is a classic example of the 'no true Scotsman's fallacy'.

I’m not denying that this guy “supports “ BLM. I’m saying that his actions do not represent the movement. Is there a term for some of the posters in this thread who say that because of the actions of this one man they are against inter racial dating? Maybe they are Trump Supporters. Let’s call them that ok?

 

[Ramon Antonio]

Jesus how dumb are you?
Do I need to hold your hand thru this?
I pointed out that "Handsome Bruce" was arguing the exact same thing as Joe by stating he wasn't an authority on who gets to speak/define BLM. (A post which you eagerly 'liked' for some odd reason, despite it saying the same thing as Hungry Joe)

Show me where I agreed or endorsed anything besides calling the dude oblivious to his shitty reasoning and noting two people were saying the same thing to reach divergent conclusions lol.
Then you claimed Joe's post was such and such because you totally misread what I posted, then decided it was easier to potshot at me than actually make whatever the fuck your argument is.

So once again, if you wanna flex whatever your Scotsman argument is, go for it big man and argue with Hungry Joe about it.

You clearly didn't read correctly.

Joe made two points:
1. The man in the video / you (Bruce) are not in the position to say what BLM represents.
2. The man in the video DOES NOT represent BLM.

Bruce then rightfully called Joe out on why HE gets to say that this man does not represent BLM. What gives him the special position of making claim number 2?

It's not rocket science.

 

[Ramon Antonio]

I’m not denying that this guy “supports “ BLM. I’m saying that his actions do not represent the movement. Is there a term for some of the posters in this thread who say that because of the actions of this one man they are against inter racial dating? Maybe they are Trump Supporters. Let’s call them that ok?

You can excuse the actions of any group that way. "Oh he wasn't a real Muslim / Christian / Jew etc.

Also, who is the real authority of BLM?

 

[brackis1]

You clearly didn't read correctly.

Joe made two points:
1. The man in the video / you (Bruce) are not in the position to say what BLM represents.
2. The man in the video DOES NOT represent BLM.

Bruce then rightfully called Joe out on why HE gets to say that this man does not represent BLM. What gives him the special position of making claim number 2?

It's not rocket science.

LOL jesus dude.
Best of luck with your go of it.

 

[Deleted member 499399]

You clearly didn't read correctly.

Joe made two points:
1. The man in the video / you (Bruce) are not in the position to say what BLM represents.
2. The man in the video DOES NOT represent BLM.

Bruce then rightfully called Joe out on why HE gets to say that this man does not represent BLM. What gives him the special position of making claim number 2?

It's not rocket science.

What do you think about it? Does this action by this individual define all of BLM? Is it ruined now that this guy did this thing? I support the movement BLM. Does that mean I must support what happened in the picture now?

 

[Ramon Antonio]

What do you think about it? Does this action by this individual define all of BLM? Is it ruined now that this guy did this thing? I support the movement BLM. Does that mean I must support what happened in the picture now?

It does not represent all of BLM, but it's not unrelated to BLM either.

I think any reasonable person is capable of not seeing the world in black and white. Nothing is ALL GOOD or ALL BAD. I assume that you support BLM in ending racism / police brutality.
Not sure if you also support them in 'getting rid of the nuclear family' and their other socialist / Marxist agenda. It's hard to support anything unconditionally IMO.

 

[Deleted member 499399]

You can excuse the actions of any group that way. "Oh he wasn't a real Muslim / Christian / Jew etc.

Also, who is the real authority of BLM?

Sure. You can also insult many groups like that. He’s an American. Is this what Americans support? What’s his profession? They all do that don’t they? What town is he from? You know the one where they all must support child abuse.
You know the underlining problem here is people wanting to put everyone in little groups because it’s easier that way. “ liberals are doing this” “ the blacks such and such” “ bunch of deplorables” . It’s just lazy and ignorant.

 

[Deleted member 499399]

It does not represent all of BLM, but it's not unrelated to BLM either.

I think any reasonable person is capable of not seeing the world in black and white. Nothing is ALL GOOD or ALL BAD. I assume that you support BLM in ending racism / police brutality.
Not sure if you also support them in 'getting rid of the nuclear family' and their other socialist / Marxist agenda. It's hard to support anything unconditionally IMO.

I support the movement and spirit. I am against racism and police brutality and I wouldn’t even know BLM had an official organization or a website for that matter if it wasn’t pointed out to me by someone who was opposed to them.

 

[Ramon Antonio]

Sure. You can also insult many groups like that. He’s an American. Is this what Americans support? What’s his profession? They all do that don’t they? What town is he from? You know the one where they all must support child abuse.
You know the underlining problem here is people wanting to put everyone in little groups because it’s easier that way. “ liberals are doing this” “ the blacks such and such” “ bunch of deplorables” . It’s just lazy and ignorant.

That is true too.

 

[PrinceOfPain]

I support the movement and spirit. I am against racism and police brutality and I wouldn’t even know BLM had an official organization or a website for that matter if it wasn’t pointed out to me by someone who was opposed to them.

Are you American? Because, if so, this depth of ignorance is a massive part of the problem in your country.
Heck, even if you are not American, you'd have to be living under a rock for it to be excusable that you could possibly be this woefully uninformed.

Fucking hell. That's just insane.

 

[surrealworlds]

Thats fine. You are a caricature of supremacy.
The irony is probably lost on you though.

Its like reading posts from a supremacy playbook.
step one- assign your opponent to a group that has a negative connotation.This invalidates anything they have said or might say and gives you a low intelligent "out" if they say something that confuses you. "Racist!"
step two - Designate them as subhuman or an "other". The easiest way is to insult a physical attribute. It doesnt matter if you can prove this to be true or not just that you repeat it enough that they get tired of arguing against it.
"Low iq" "stumble over your keyboard"

FYI i post from my cellphone and dont usually go back to check for typos cause i dont give a fuck.

By the way what are you even arguing about? In my original post i stated an opinion and even implied that opinion might be wrong and formed from too much media lately. You could have disagreed with the opinion but no, just had to go straight to the supremacist, racist remarks. Couldn't help yourself could you?

Yeah man how could I have inferred that?
You can't even write a single sentence without stumbling over your keyboard lol.
You're a delusional piece of trash crying about black people and then trying to say that other people are unhappy.<Lmaoo>

 

[wrestlefan]

You have no idea what the context was, that baby could have been up to anything.

 

[deadshot138]

Thats fine. You are a caricature of supremacy.
The irony is probably lost on you though.

Its like reading posts from a supremacy playbook.
step one- assign your opponent to a group that has a negative connotation.This invalidates anything they have said or might say and gives you a low intelligent "out" if they say something that confuses you. "Racist!"
step two - Designate them as subhuman or an "other". The easiest way is to insult a physical attribute. It doesnt matter if you can prove this to be true or not just that you repeat it enough that they get tired of arguing against it.
"Low iq" "stumble over your keyboard"

FYI i post from my cellphone and dont usually go back to check for typos cause i dont give a fuck.

By the way what are you even arguing about? In my original post i stated an opinion and even implied that opinion might be wrong and formed from too much media lately. You could have disagreed with the opinion but no, just had to go straight to the supremacist, racist remarks. Couldn't help yourself could you?

@brackis1 is a troll, don't feed him

 

[ElKarlo]

this is the necessary and intended result of fake narratives, selective outrage, and racial animus of the left.

Yes. It is media driven nonsense and it gets people to think that their horrible actions are somehow heroic. Bet fools like Falsedawn and baraks1 this o he's a hero

 

[Clear Winner]

It does not represent all of BLM, but it's not unrelated to BLM either.

I think any reasonable person is capable of not seeing the world in black and white. Nothing is ALL GOOD or ALL BAD. I assume that you support BLM in ending racism / police brutality.
Not sure if you also support them in 'getting rid of the nuclear family' and their other socialist / Marxist agenda. It's hard to support anything unconditionally IMO.

a sensible post amongst the sea of turds.

​

 

[nac386]

The two most racist people on this forum continuing to meet expectations. What a sad bunch.

This is where you guys go off the rails a bit, and it's consistent. It happens all the time. There is an actual racist in this thread, saying directly racist things, but you both entirely ignored it. He doubled, tripled, and quadrupled down as well:

"Why do you hate interracial relationships"
"Why don't you like to live around minorities"
"Why don't you support BLM"
"Why do you support brutal police tactics"

Answer:

You hear that, LI? Holic hates you. He hates you for being the product of an interracial relationship. He does not even want to live near you.

But by all means, let's focus on Trotsky, who was challenged by people left and right and actually amended his thinking a bit, instead of the guy who has now quadrupled down on directly saying he hates mixed people and doesn't want to live near non-whites.

 

[uppercutbus]

UPDATE: Charges pending for man accused of kneeling on child’s neck in social media photo

https://www.whio.com/news/crime-and...eling-childs-neck/7GREMQGUZNC6DBZAFQCVDVZXKI/

Are you American? Because, if so, this depth of ignorance is a massive part of the problem in your country.
Heck, even if you are not American, you'd have to be living under a rock for it to be excusable that you could possibly be this woefully uninformed.

Fucking hell. That's just insane.

He's feigning this level of ignorance as a shield.

 

[Cracked_Skull]

I'm the king of BLM and I decided he shouldn't have done that. He's already in prison again though, so cancelling his facebook profile might be an over the top reaction.