DDP Izzy
UFC wants what it wants
Sean jabs can't stop it.
Allow me to editorialize for a second-
i don't normally believe in conspiracy theories in sports judging but lately the UFC is making me rethink that. At the start of this thread we had Valentina v Grasso on Mexican night and that one seemed hinky as hell.
Today we have a highly controversial outspoken underwhelming record having defensive minded champion losing a toss up fight to a young charisma filled international exciting fighter with a built in story line for a match with another young more exciting international highly promoted superstar that the champ beat. I will go full on tin foil hat wearing anti-UFC F Dana White that whife slapping mound of melting vanilla pudding hating if Sean vs DDP doesn't get run back and they give the shot to Izzy. When I grew up in boxing the saying was "you have to beat the champ" or a close decision always defaulted to the reigning champion. Not so much after ESPN got involved.
I am now also thinking of changing my sherdog name to DDP-Izzy or at least starting a rap career under that name
The defense, ring control and activity versus damage and un-capitalized take downs arguments will ring throughout Sherdog for a while now. We can all enjoy that Sturm und Drang
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.