- Joined
- Oct 24, 2006
- Messages
- 7,806
- Reaction score
- 879
so difficult to choose between fedor and anderson...
You can certainly remove some ranked fighters, like Serra, when you compare number of ranked wins. Fedor will probably be the one that loses the most from that though, as he has some of his ranked wins taking place at very advantageous points in their careers.
And you don't clean out the division through beating most and then have a fan speculate how the rest would go. You clean out the division by beating everyone. It's not always fair in how those opportunities are but that's the way fighting is. Fedor was the best, but he didn't actually clean out the division.
As for losses, those of course count. I think it's far more important to have big wins than it is to retire undefeated though. Hendo isn't a good choice for GOAT imo since he's not really even been at the top of a weight class.
Last time I checked Fedor and Ando were tied. But Anderson was finished himself more than Fedor.
Hendo won a tournament, he was never UFC champion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_UFC_champions
Or check the article Sherdog did on UFC champions.
You're the one trying to "bend" Hendo into being a UFC champion, lol.
If you were uncertain as to what I meant by it (which is surprising as it's pretty conventional usage), you could've asked for clarification instead of assuming dumb shit.They have been finished an equal amount of times now. 3 regular times each and then one TKO that will have an asterisk next to it.
You said "gold". That's not specifically a belt and it doesn't mean a divisional championship. When you go into details I'll do the same.
Fedor didn't even clean out the hw division while in Pride. He never fought Alistair, Barnett, Werdum (in Pride), Kharitonov, etc.
You can certainly remove some ranked fighters, like Serra, when you compare number of ranked wins. Fedor will probably be the one that loses the most from that though, as he has some of his ranked wins taking place at very advantageous points in their careers.
And you don't clean out the division through beating most and then have a fan speculate how the rest would go. You clean out the division by beating everyone. It's not always fair in how those opportunities are but that's the way fighting is. Fedor was the best, but he didn't actually clean out the division.
As for losses, those of course count. I think it's far more important to have big wins than it is to retire undefeated though. Hendo isn't a good choice for GOAT imo since he's not really even been at the top of a weight class.
So Fedor didn't finish the best guys he fought? Anderson didn't finish Welterweight Demian Maia.
How's about those minute details?
They have been finished an equal amount of times now. 3 regular times each and then one TKO that will have an asterisk next to it.
Fedor didn't even clean out the hw division while in Pride. He never fought Alistair, Barnett, Werdum (in Pride), Kharitonov, etc.
They have been finished an equal amount of times now. 3 regular times each and then one TKO that will have an asterisk next to it.
So no one cleaned out their division then. Throughout his career Silva never fought Souza, Machida, Mousasi, Filho, Munoz, Rockhold or Dennis Kang. GSP never fought Rory, Kampann, Ellenberger, Maia, Lawler, or Askren.
If you were uncertain as to what I meant by it (which is surprising as it's pretty conventional usage), you could've asked for clarification instead of assuming dumb shit.
The only ones that have asterisks next to them are Fedor's doctor stoppages as Fedor could've easily continued with cut/swollen eye.
No way could Anderson have continued with a broken leg. He was literally screaming in agony.
Anderson has been finished 4 times. Fedor 2.
That's one way to look at it. Generally people will look at it as if there's a point where the champion has beaten every relevant contender. Cleaning a division out will always be followed by new talent, sooner or later, but that's not really relevant as no one will beat every fighter that's ever going to fight in his division. The point is that in no relevant definition did Fedor do it, even when just looking within the top organization, since Barnett was always around.
I'm just talking about what he brought up. When they are fairly equal in finishing ratio (Anderson ahead by a negligible amount) I'll see it as better to finish the best guys and not do it against some lesser ones because you decide to act like a moron and make a joke out of it.
Then by your definition no one can be a GOAT unless they are post Pride era, because the UFC had some fighters. But you don't seem to take issue with Bellator having some fighters that aren't in the UFC.
Barnett was not "always around" in Pride. He didn't pick up a win in Pride until 2006, when I guess you could jump him to title contention. Fedor held the belt and #1 status 3 years before that.
After Fedor beat CroCop, no one questioned his status. A handful of UFC nuthuggers screamed for him to prove himself against Tim and Andrei for years and years; when he finally did, they said he had to fight all these newer fighters. He was already on the back end of his career at that point.
Your arguing is infantile and your assertion of your opinion as fact is laughable. GOAT is in the eye of the beholder. To me, no GOAT would make a mockery out of the fight game twice. It makes me happy, even as an Anderson fan, that Chris took his soul and his leg. His actions vs Maia were despicable and his actions vs Weidman 1 were inexcusable. He earned that left hook to the chin and that shin on knee action.
Good day cur.