@Madmick
Apparently some of the shine of the M1 Ultra is coming off:
No, not at all. We already knew Apple's claims were hyperbolic as I noted in my
post from a week and a half ago (ex. claiming 90% higher multicore performance than the 12900K despite that early Geekbench leaks showed it was +50% at best). PC Gamer couldn't help stifle a bit of sarcasm in its headline covering this "surprise". Generally, the negging clickbait was strong yesterday, partly because Apple boasted too strongly, but moreso simply because tech journalists sought to capitalize on the interest the M1 series has drawn. This might be the finest example of a misleading headline:
Appuals: Apple’s New M1 Ultra SoC is Nearly 3 Times Bigger Than an AMD Ryzen CPU But Still Falls Behind Performance Claims
Uh, who cares? The M1 Ultra isn't just a CPU. Glue that 3300X to an RTX 3090 (or an RTX 3050 for that matter) and this size comparison would mean something. Nor does mention of how the M1 Ultra falls short of Apple's exaggerated performance claims tell us anything about its performance respective to the Ryzen CPUs in terms of CPU performance, and its size has no relevance to this assessment, anyway.
I'm actually floored by how well the Mac Pro did in the cross-platform game benchmarks. I expected it to do nearly this well in editing tasks better optimized for parallel processing, though not quite this well, but certainly not
gaming. It's nuts. Observe how it fared against a 12900K + RTX 3090:
Know where that puts the gaming performance of the M1 Ultra? Just barely shy of the RTX 3080. That's just one game, because it does more poorly in most if you dig deeper, but it's one where Mac's glaring deficit in optimization isn't holding its hardware back, and it's also one that tests most of the more modern features.
And, again, the key here isn't just performance, but power consumption. Remember the most power the M1 Max pulled even in
stress testing (measured by Anandtech) was 92W. Since the M1 Ultra is just two Max's put together, it's reasonable to deduce its peak is roughly double this. That's ~185W. That's far less than the 12900K draws
by itself. It's less than
half what the RTX 3090 draws.
Furthermore, without regarding power consumption, consider where Apple would have stood in this race in 2019. If you aren't astonished, you're harder to impress than a trash-talking GSP.