I don't think it's been finished yet, but from a legal standpoint, that guilt or innocence cannot even be brought up during this case. If an attorney were to start saying, "According to the findings of the court for the victims case..." they would be doing so with the expectation that the state would object, and the judge would agree. It doesn't make Cain's actions more or less legal, it'd just be an emotional appeal for the jury/public's sake
But as far as evidence goes, from what I recall, there still have been no other children testifying, so the lone accusation is Cain's 4 year old saying he touched his penis something like 100 times.