- Joined
- Aug 27, 2005
- Messages
- 41,443
- Reaction score
- 0
Is there anyone not in favor of this?Good, hang all the crooks in politics. As long as it is even handed justice, I say throw the book at all of them, no favorites and no mercy.
Is there anyone not in favor of this?Good, hang all the crooks in politics. As long as it is even handed justice, I say throw the book at all of them, no favorites and no mercy.
I would probably be inclined against disbelieving them based solely upon their status as anonymous. There are many legit reasons why a source could or should stay anonymous in any given situation.
It is merely odd to me that many users on the right within this site laughed away the claims made against Trump based upon sources being anonymous, yet apply no such strictures in regard to Hilary Clinton.
I can't speak for anyone else but considering this source is going to testify before congress that adds more weight to it. Wouldn't you agree that a source that is anonymous and a source that is anonymous but is testifying before congress our two different things?
Or maybe it'll be more than not much in support of nothing muchHopefully the informant doesn’t get fatally robbed with nothing taken from him.