Your argument was that South Korea has low chance of race riot therefore superior to America.
You just said I said the USA is about to "fall apart". I have never said that, liar.
Because its a loaded questio? I will answer which country has a higher chance of race riots when you answer which country has a higher chance of entering into a japanese style recession.
Why would you wait for me to answer your question when it was me who asked my question first? Coward.
LOL want me to bring all the wars, genocides and problems among people of the same race?
Please give me examples of genocide or just widespread violence within a
SINGLE ETHNIC GROUP. Remember Rod...
SINGLE ETHNIC GROUP. Not "race",
ETHNIC GROUP. So don't start talking about how Europeans spent hundreds of years slaughtering each other in wars, because that's NOT what I'm talking about.
Also, I am NOT talking about "race". Once again, you're having to put words in my mouth. There could still be serious problems within a country where everyone is of the same race, but there are different ethnic groups. For example, Japan is more stable if it only has Japanese people in it rather than if it was 50% Japanese, 50% Korean (both the same race).
im saying that blood is not really what brings people together
People that share the same ethnicity (blood) & also practice the same culture are united in a way all the ethnicities of the USA could never be. I've explained to you this is what I mean, but you keep creating strawman arguments.
the US may be ethnically diverse but most people will think of themselves as Americans before something else.
African-American, Mexican-American, Hispanic-American, white American, Asian-American, Arab-American... LOL
It's really not, and I'm explaining why.
North Korea vs South Korea, same blood divided by a fucking minefield.
Once again, completely overlooking how that came into being. Japanese imperialism is responsible for all of that, and today, North Korea doesn't want to be dominated by the USA, as it believes South Korea has.
Ireland, divided into catholic and non-catholic.
British imperialism & religion. Once again, you're completely overlooking what caused this conflict. You have no argument.
Iberia (divided into 2 states and many nations)
Different cultures. Keep failing.
There is no violence between the English, Scottish & Welsh. /facepalm
Eastern and western europe.
Once again, that's a continent. There are completely different cultures. Keep failing.
Europe is divided despite all being of the same race
Once again, that's a continent. There are completely different cultures. Keep failing.
I am talking about individual nations. You keep bringing up conflicts brought about due to imperialism & religion.
Quoting Churchill.
We must build a kind of United States of Europe. In this way only, will hundreds of millions of toilers be able to regain the simple joys and hopes which make life worth living.
When all else fails, throw in a quote from a famous person. ROFL
Yet you couldnt, to a point where 2 european wars were called world wars with an unprecedent level of devastation.
Which had absolutely nothing to do with homogeneous nations. Still, you're unable to grasp my argument.
I am saying that a COUNTRY that is made up of the same ethnicity (blood) and practices the same culture is going to be far more stable than a country that is made up of many different ethnicities, cultures & religions. It's not hard to understand, but you just can't grasp it. lol
In response, you keep bringing up conflicts brought about by imperialism & religion, between different ethnic groups.
Yet the US, China and India are larger than Europe individually, and they are all created by a lot of different states and regions.
What the fuck has that got to do with this? Land mass? Is that what you're talking about? LOL
The US is built out of 50 states, they havent gone to war against each other for 150 years
And I've never argued that they're about to. LOL what the FUCK are you talking about?
And thats the problem, Europe has too many nations, why is Sweden, Norway and Denmark separate? why is Portugal and Spain? why is Germany and Austria?
Here's a more appropriate question: WHY DO YOU KEEP TALKING ABOUT THE CONTINENT OF EUROPE? I am talking about single individual COUNTRIES and the fact individual countries are more stable if they're ethnically & culturally homogeneous. You're SO fucking dumb. LOL
When european leaders have tried to unify the country, its met by a lot of resistance Napoleon, Charles V, Charlemagne, Hitler take your pick.
Fact remains that when europe was 99.9% white, it was still one of the most divided lands in the world.
Because of culture & religion you imbecile. I already stated a thousand times that when an individual COUNTRY (not continent... country, okay? Are you grasping what I'm saying yet? COUNTRY) is made up of the same ethnicity and practices the same culture, it is a lot more stable than an ethnically, culturally & religiously mixed nation. You keep bringing up continents, states, imperialism-motivated conflicts & religiously-motivated conflicts. /facepalmx999999999999
No fucking wonder you keep ignoring my question - which country is more likely to suffer from race riots: USA or South Korea? LOL
Meanwhile China, India and the US all remain firmly under one government despite their ethnic differences.
There are severe problems in India due to its diversity, especially religious diversity. Are you kidding me? And in the parts of China that have the most ethnic/religious diversity, what would ya know... this is happening...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xinjiang_conflict
^^ make sure you look at the 'Belligerents' to the right side of that page.
And if you're not aware of the racial tensions in the USA, then I don't know what to say to you. LOL
Just because a country hasn't completely broken up, that doesn't mean it's stable & happy. I am also talking about a general feeling of happiness within a country. The USA is not happy. Homogeneous countries that practice the same culture (and ideally have no religion) are the most stable & happy. There is a bond between the people based on blood/ancestry, culture & history. In the USA, there is division between the different ethnic & religious groups and it results in a constant tension that people have to put up with. That's the bear minimum, the worst is violence. Worst case scenario, civil war. I'm not saying I think the USA will ever suffer a civil war based on race/ethnicity, but it certainly has happened in other parts of the world.
So, to conclude, you're either the dumbest person on this forum as you can't understand my argument, or you're purposely being disingenuous and constantly misrepresenting my argument. Which is it?