Crime Epstein List drop is in 3... 2... 1.... Tomorrow.

[johnsmithjohnson]

One hell of a Hoax. Right maga?

 

[Rob Battisti]

They arrest 100 year old former Nazis guilty of war crimes 80 years ago. Shouldn't matter how old any of these fuckers get. If they did something wrong arrest them.

We should bring back the guillotine

 

[HOLA]

Just so we are crystal clear where you stand on this. You agree with Patel that there is zero evidence that Epstein was trafficking minors to prominent political figures? That he only used these minors for himself?

Jean Luc Brunel was already arrested due to an investigation into Epstein's sex trafficking network, and the part he played in it. It took place in France, not The U.S., but that still shows Patel's statement is nonsense.

Brunel killed himself in prison in 2022.

 

[HereticBD]

Just so we are crystal clear where you stand on this. You agree with Patel that there is zero evidence that Epstein was trafficking minors to prominent political figures? That he only used these minors for himself?

Not at all, but you need evidence to charge people with a crime. As far as Clinton goes, there's nothing that would warrant any charges. You can't just be arresting people and charging them with crimes based on hunches. That's not how the law works.

 

[44nutman]

Jean Luc Brunel was already arrested due to an investigation into Epstein's sex trafficking network, and the part he played in it. It took place in France, not The U.S., but that still shows Patel's statement is nonsense.

Brunel killed himself in prison in 2022.

A lot of people talk about the Clinton Body Count, but Trump is putting up some high numbers as well.
Epstein, Giuffrie and Brunel all associated with Epstein, and all committed " suicide". Then we have the guy at Duetsche Bank who helped Trump get his loans, after Trump had filed like his 6th bankruptcy and at that time could not get a loan with any American bank because Trump fucked all those banks. That guy fell off a building.

 

[b34stmode]

Not at all, but you need evidence to charge people with a crime. As far as Clinton goes, there's nothing that would warrant any charges. You can't just be arresting people and charging them with crimes based on hunches. That's not how the law works.

Alot of this is testimony from the girls talking to the FBI twenty years ago and being laughed at or threatened. what do you mean "a hunch"? Are you just making shit up? There are multiple documents from the girls own words about going to the FBI and being threatened, twentie years ago.

why isn't the Trump admin and Patel mentioning this to Americans? Why isn't there an internal investigation being opened up? We both know the answer to this question.

 

[HereticBD]

Those photos with Clinton and the females whose faces are redacted the DOJ should be adding context to them to let us know who these females are without outing their identity. For all we know those females could be some of the victims

They very well could be. Unless you have evidence of Clinton abusing them or any other crimes involving them, you have nothing to criminally charge him with.

 

[Satanical Eve]

The DOJ’s failure to provide context for redacted faces in Epstein-related photos creates ambiguity that can unfairly imply wrongdoing or conceal it. This lack of clarity harms public understanding and risks reputational damage without due process. They need to add context to each photo that includes a famous individual and those whose faces are redacted. Not doing so leads to a shit ton of speculation and especially in the case of Clinton

 

[b34stmode]

Also would love to know why these men have been sensored.



Trumps DOJ has blatantly broken the law, do we have any politicians with a set of balls to go after them.................?

 

[Alpha_T83]

What a compelling argument. Same question to you. What would you charge him with?

Like I said: The DOJ is withholding Epstein files related to Clinton and Congress has said as much.

The law is clear: Release all the files or charge Clinton. I don't know what you believe, but legal experts agree: The DOJ aren't going to be allowed to hide behind "ongoing investigations" in the long-term.

A lot of these overly redacted or withheld documents are going to end up in Federal Court, and judges can and will rule investigations are either 1) shams or 2) moribund. And when they do, all documents attached to those investigations will be ordered released.

 

[HereticBD]

The law is clear: Release all the files or charge Clinton.

LOL, wut? That's not how the law works.

 

[Alpha_T83]

Trumps DOJ has blatantly broken the law, do we have any politicians with a set of balls to go after them.................?

It's going to be his own Republican Congress that has to do it.

And the funny thing is that Republican Congress overruled Trump and told him "release the files" because they wanted to rip off the bandaid. They didn't want this Epstein issue hanging over them when it comes to the midterm elections. They want this whole fiasco done and over with, and they don't care if it embarrasses Trump and his allies.

But Trump's DOJ is blatantly violating the law he himself agreed to. Now it's up to Republicans to either send Pam Bondi to jail, or do nothing and allow this cover-up to make the situation worse during the midterm elections.

 

[fortheo]

Do these dumb fucks really want us to think that epstein trafficked 1200 victims to himself? They want us to ignore the victims who have mentioned numerous time that other powerful men were involved. They conveniently left out the vast majority of files that tell us anything about the clients.

Anybody still supporting these people need help.

 

[Alpha_T83]

LOL, wut? That's not how the law works.

Yes it is. Plenty of legal experts have weighed in.

The DOJ will have to prove in court that their "ongoing cases" are making substantive and continuing progress, otherwise the judges will strike them down as a valid excuse to redact or withhold files.

 

[Satanical Eve]

They very well could be. Unless you have evidence of Clinton abusing them or any other crimes involving them, you have nothing to criminally charge him with.

I understand the point being made; however, President Clinton’s previous false public statements about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky have understandably caused many people to view his later associations, including those involving Epstein, with increased skepticism.

 

[Alpha_T83]

The DOJ’s failure to provide context for redacted faces in Epstein-related photos creates ambiguity that can unfairly imply wrongdoing or conceal it. This lack of clarity harms public understanding and risks reputational damage without due process. They need to add context to each photo that includes a famous individual and those whose faces are redacted. Not doing so leads to a shit ton of speculation and especially in the case of Clinton

Exactly.

Clinton in a hot tub with a woman whose face is redacted can go one of two ways. Either she is some random unrelated person, or she is a sex trafficking victim. And as you said, the DOJ is required to annotate that redaction: "Epstein child sex trafficking victim identity redacted."

 

[HereticBD]

Yes it is. Plenty of legal experts have weighed in.

The DOJ will have to prove in court that their "ongoing cases" are making substantive and continuing progress, otherwise the judges will strike them down as a valid excuse to redact or withhold files.

And that has what to do with prosecuting Bill Clinton?

Just stop trying to be a lawyer. You clearly have no fucking idea what you're talking about.

 

[Alpha_T83]

Do these dumb fucks really want us to think that epstein trafficked 1200 victims to himself? They want us to ignore the victims who have mentioned numerous time that other powerful men were involved. They conveniently left out the vast majority of files that tell us anything about the clients.

Anybody still supporting these people need help.

Yea I don't know what Trump was thinking he could do here.

Republicans clearly want everything released, because they don't want the Epstein files issue hanging over their heads, come midterm elections (or even primaries, if MAGA candidates challenge them). But it is widely rumored that dozens of people have copies of the Epstein files, and there is a type of mutually assured destruction going on here: If Trump releases too much and burns some of Epstein's clients like Bill Clinton, then Bill Clinton might leak his own version of the files to the media which buries Trump.

Trump doesn't have any good choices. Either continue the cover-up, or bury himself.

 

[Alpha_T83]

And that has what to do with prosecuting Bill Clinton?

Just stop trying to be a lawyer. You clearly have no fucking idea what you're talking about.

@HereticBD

I'm marking this post for later. When lawsuits start being filed and judges start ruling DOJ investigations as moribund or sham investigations, I will come back and tell you that I told you so.

 

[HereticBD]

I understand the point being made; however, President Clinton’s previous false public statements about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky have understandably caused many people to view his later associations, including those involving Epstein, with increased skepticism.

I'm not saying you can't make personal assumptions. That's natural. I'm saying that you need a hell of a lot more than that, to go arrest the guy.