Crime Epstein List drop is in 3... 2... 1.... Tomorrow.

@scorpiorising Great post, however it has to be said that there is only one side running interference for anyone and it's the people on the right. The left, across the board, have been "lock them all up".
Are you referring to regular citizens or politicians?

Most people i talk to all say lock them all up, but also a million conspiracy theories are attached to their statement.

As for politicians, do the left have any actual legitimate say if documents get released? I legitimately dont know. If they dont have a say it could be just lip service.
 
This isn't a court of law bud. This is the court of public opinion.
That's all well and good, but you were just suggesting that the DOJ arrest and prosecute Clinton, based on your personal hunch. You know, court of law shit.

You can assume whatever you want. That's not a basis to arrest anyone.
 
Are you referring to regular citizens or politicians?

Most people i talk to all say lock them all up, but also a million conspiracy theories are attached to their statement.

As for politicians, do the left have any actual legitimate say if documents get released? I legitimately dont know. If they dont have a say it could be just lip service.
I'm talking about the people in the WR and politicians. Nobody on the left is trying to defend Clinton or anyone else on the left.

Do politicians have a say? A bill was voted on to release all the files. The (R)s resisted but in the end being on record to not release the files would have been bad and they knew it. The House and Senate passed the bill and Trump signed it into law. Trump had no choice, either.
 
That's all well and good, but you were just suggesting that the DOJ arrest and prosecute Clinton, based on your personal hunch. You know, court of law shit.

You can assume whatever you want. That's not a basis to arrest anyone.
Until the DOJ prosecute Clinton, people are going to call coverup. Maybe Clinton is innocent. But let that come out in a court of law.

Again, the real reason they won't prosecute Clinton is because he has his copy of the Epstein files, and if Trump burns him, he will burn Trump and release everything.
 
Until the DOJ prosecute Clinton, people are going to call coverup. Maybe Clinton is innocent. But let that come out in a court of law.
What would the initial charge be, Columbo? Hanging out with Epstein is not a crime. You can't just make shit up without any evidence, and ask someone to defend themselves in court over them. Are you fucking insane?
 
Until the DOJ prosecute Clinton, people are going to call coverup. Maybe Clinton is innocent. But let that come out in a court of law.

Again, the real reason they won't prosecute Clinton is because he has his copy of the Epstein files, and if Trump burns him, he will burn Trump and release everything.
That and Trump gargled Clinton's ballsack.
 
What would the initial charge be, Columbo? Hanging out with Epstein is not a crime. You can't just make shit up without any evidence, and ask someone to defend themselves in court over them. Are you fucking insane?
Again, Clinton's guilt is inferred from these releases. The DOJ either needs to 1) release all files related to Clinton's involvement in the Epstein files, completely unredacted with the exception of victim identities, or 2) prosecute Clinton.

You can't have it both ways. Either you've got an investigation into Clinton that you can push to a prosecution, or there is not evidence to convict Clinton, in which case all Epstein files related to him must be released.

And we know not everything has been released because members of Congress have access to the unredacted files, and they are saying that everything isn't being released.
 
If there "isn't a case to try Andrew Mountbatten Windsor", if absolutely nobody else ever gets tried, then I'm Skippy the Bush Kangaroo.

This is ridiculous.
 
Again, Clinton's guilt is inferred from these releases.
Guilt of what? Being in pictures? What a compelling case, Councilor.

Again, what would the initial charge be, that you would have enough to arrest and charge him on? Just give me one crime you would charge him with.
 
Why are they like this? Are they willing to defend Trump at all cost? For what? I don't get it. IDGAF about Trump, but the way this entire thing has been handled is disgusting. Remember when Bondi held the press conference with binders and everyone smiling a year or so ago? Now look at where we are at. How could anyone defend that?
They're very vulnerable to propaganda which led to them being bamboozled by Trump in the first place.

They have extremely fragile egos which won't let them ever admit they're wrong.

Bunch of insecure rubes fueled by the Sunk-Cost Fallacy, basically.
 
Will those who support this administration admit they and the DOJ bungled the Epstein files and the release? Can you at least agree on that?
 
It’s wild how important it is to national security to protect these PDFs.


Wild. Page 14. Sounds like Slick Willy was deep in this game as well.

And just to show I'm not here just hoping Trump goes down. Bill Clinton has been a disgusting perv for 3 decades now. And now he is so old its impossible to even hold him to some type of justice. Fucking sickening. Why hasn't Trump dropped the fucking hammer on people like Bill Clinton? Hillary? Why? Why do Trumpers give him a pass on this?


"When my friend had sexual intercourse with Clinton, Prince Andrew and Richard Branson, sextapes were in fact filmed on each separate occasion by Jeffery. Thank God she managed to get ahold of some footage of the filmed sex tapes, which clearly identify the faces of Clinton, PrinceAndrew and Branson having sexual intercourse with her. Frustratingly enough Epstein was notseen in any of the footage but he was clever like that!"


Remember when Patel said there was zero evidence showing Epstein was trafficking girls to anyone but himself? How can we as Americans let shit like that stand? does he just get to blatantly lie to millions of Americans as the head of our FBI?


"When my friend eventually had the courage to speak out and went to the police in 2008 to reportwhat had happened, nothing was done and she was utterly humiliated by the police departmentwhere she went to report what had happened with Epstein, Clinton, Branson and Prince Andrew.She was made to feel like a dirty whore and a liar and wasn’t taken seriously. When she then triedto sue Epstein for damages, she was severely bullied and threatened by his lawyer AlanDershowitz whom she also had sexual relations with and who was also heavily involved inEpstein's :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:phile Ring

A couple months later, she was then approached, by Special Agents Forces Men sent directly byHilary Clinton herself, in order to protect her presidential campaign in 2008. They heavilyintimidated her, ruffled her up (luckily she took photos as evidence) and was then forced to sign aconfidentiality agreement which ensures that she can never come forward publicly implicating herhusband.She was then given a substantial payout, directly from the Clinton Foundation to keep her quiet.She is 1000% certain that the FBI did a cover up and she has the individual names of Hilary’sSpecial Agent Officers involved in intimidating her. She was then forced against her will to sign alegally binding confidentially agreement on Hilary’s behalf for her eternal silence. If she breaks thisagreement, she is dead."

I actually don't think I can even keep reading this shit with how infuriating its making me.
 
What would the initial charge be, Columbo? Hanging out with Epstein is not a crime. You can't just make shit up without any evidence, and ask someone to defend themselves in court over them. Are you fucking insane?


Just so we are crystal clear where you stand on this. You agree with Patel that there is zero evidence that Epstein was trafficking minors to prominent political figures? That he only used these minors for himself?
 
What a compelling argument. Same question to you. What would you charge him with?
Those photos with Clinton and the females whose faces are redacted the DOJ should be adding context to them to let us know who these females are without outing their identity. For all we know those females could be some of the victims
 
And just to show I'm not here just hoping Trump goes down. Bill Clinton has been a disgusting perv for 3 decades now. And now he is so old its impossible to even hold him to some type of justice. Fucking sickening. Why hasn't Trump dropped the fucking hammer on people like Bill Clinton? Hillary? Why? Why do Trumpers give him a pass on this?


"When my friend had sexual intercourse with Clinton, Prince Andrew and Richard Branson, sextapes were in fact filmed on each separate occasion by Jeffery. Thank God she managed to get ahold of some footage of the filmed sex tapes, which clearly identify the faces of Clinton, PrinceAndrew and Branson having sexual intercourse with her. Frustratingly enough Epstein was notseen in any of the footage but he was clever like that!"


Remember when Patel said there was zero evidence showing Epstein was trafficking girls to anyone but himself? How can we as Americans let shit like that stand? does he just get to blatantly lie to millions of Americans as the head of our FBI?
They arrest 100 year old former Nazis guilty of war crimes 80 years ago. Shouldn't matter how old any of these fuckers get. If they did something wrong arrest them.
 
Back
Top