Social DR James Cantor, Canadian clinical psychologist and sexologist pushes for Pedophiles rights

M3t4tr0n said:
The two have nothing to do with each other.
Click to expand...
Dr. James Cantor, the guy promoting pedo in the OP, is openly gay. He might be pedo as well from the looks of him pushing for pedophile rights.
 
I don't really see why they need to be more of the LGBT, etc. What rights do they need that they don't have?
 
The first step will be collective sympathy from the general public and slowly humanize by putting forth arguments that this is something that people are born with in the same sense that people are born gay or born in "the wrong body," which is very easy to make arguments for.
 
Yea some really creepy stuff is happening. Right now on Twitter they are banning feminists who say things like "men can't become women" but there are plenty of pro-pedophilia accounts allowed to be active - MAPs, they call themselves. Mi or attracted persons. We see it in other platforms too, like Wordpress. They have banned and deleted all the content from some "transphobic" feminists but keep MAP content up.

It's really sick and there clearly is a pedo-acceptance movement that is looking to infiltrate and exploit the LGBTQ "community" as well as the broader social justice left. I believe a similar thing happened in the UK in the 80s with PIE.
 
And definitely the "trans kid" phenomenon/industry has worked as a Trojan horse of sorts to push this agenda. I have posted plenty of stuff on here showing how trans activists have advanced the narrative that children have agency to make life-long decisions. How they market "packers" for "trans boys" under the age of 5 - we're talking about tiny dildos to stuff in the underwear of little girls so they can pretend they're boys. How they encourage kids and teens to talk to strange adults online behind their parent's back. How they've pressured the Girl Guides organization in some places to let "trans women" be leaders without informing the parents of the girls. If you can't see where this is all headed than I can't help you.
 
sangreporsangre said:
Yea some really creepy stuff is happening. Right now on Twitter they are banning feminists who say things like "men can't become women" but there are plenty of pro-pedophilia accounts allowed to be active - MAPs, they call themselves. Mi or attracted persons. We see it in other platforms too, like Wordpress. They have banned and deleted all the content from some "transphobic" feminists but keep MAP content up.

It's really sick and there clearly is a pedo-acceptance movement that is looking to infiltrate and exploit the LGBTQ "community" as well as the broader social justice left. I believe a similar thing happened in the UK in the 80s with PIE.
Click to expand...

Some people on twitter are now adding a 'M', not a 'P' to the LGBTQ acronym, with the 'M' standing for MAP - minor attracted person. They claim to be non-contact pedophiles who just want understanding and acceptance, but some people have managed to infiltrate their twitter circles and get invited to private groups they have online where theses scumbags are exchanging child porn and talking about kids they have abused.

There were a few twitter threads on this but it looks like they have now been removed, no doubt because the police got involved. Although here is someone who got into a DM chat they were having on twitter



I got banned from twitter for 'hate speech' for posting the suicide statistics of transgender people. I didn't even give any opinion, someone asked if there were any stats to back up the claim that transsexuals have a higher rate of suicide, so I provided them with a couple of links, one of which was from an NHS study, and boom, I was gone. But stuff like this is allowed.
 
Last edited:
Hard To Tell said:
Some people on twitter are now adding an 'M', not a 'P' to the LGBTQ acronym, with the 'M' standing for MAP - minor attracted person. They claim to be non-contact pedophiles who just want understanding and acceptance, but some people have managed to infiltrate their twitter circles and get invited to private groups they have online where theses scumbags are exchanging child porn and talking about kids they have abused.

There were a few twitter threads on this but it looks like they have now been removed, no doubt because the police got involved. Although here is someone who got into a DM chat they were having on twitter



I got banned from twitter for 'hate speech' for posting the suicide statistics of transgender people. I didn't even give any opinion, someone asked if there were any stats to back up the claim that transsexuals have a higher rate of suicide, so I provided them with a couple of links, one of which from an NHS study, and boom, I was gone. But stuff like this is allowed.
Click to expand...

Wow, so they are disguising the P with an M.

LGBTQM. I wonder how soon we will see that go mainstream?
 
ToxicShocker said:
If someone says something on Twitter, is it a new movement?
Click to expand...

Here's how it works: If someone who does not support Trump says something on Twitter you automatically are in agreement with their position if you, also, do not support Trump.
 
Hard To Tell said:
Some people on twitter are now adding an 'M', not a 'P' to the LGBTQ acronym, with the 'M' standing for MAP - minor attracted person. They claim to be non-contact pedophiles who just want understanding and acceptance, but some people have managed to infiltrate their twitter circles and get invited to private groups they have online where theses scumbags are exchanging child porn and talking about kids they have abused.

There were a few twitter threads on this but it looks like they have now been removed, no doubt because the police got involved. Although here is someone who got into a DM chat they were having on twitter



I got banned from twitter for 'hate speech' for posting the suicide statistics of transgender people. I didn't even give any opinion, someone asked if there were any stats to back up the claim that transsexuals have a higher rate of suicide, so I provided them with a couple of links, one of which was from an NHS study, and boom, I was gone. But stuff like this is allowed.
Click to expand...


I was banned from Twitter myself for "misgendering" Jonathan/Jessica Yaniv, a pervert scumbag who is suing 15 women in BC right now for not waxing his balls (hey wasn't bill C-16 such a great idea??). I fully expect Crave to make "misgendering" a cardable or bannable offense on here soon enough.
 
For the get-go you need to know the difference between paedophile = attraction to children vs child molester = sexual action towards children, regardless of the motivation e.g. power/control or attraction. Cantor's research shows that there are important physiological differences in the brain structures of paedophiles as seen on brain scans. Compared to the general population, paedophiles are also significantly shorter, their IQ is one standard deviation lower and they're much more likely to be left-handed (30% vs 8% of the general population). These are manifestations of differences in the organization of their brain, which likely arose during foetal brain development for reasons yet undiscovered.

So for people not familiar with his research, this is really out of left field. But he's basically taking this idea (born, not a choice, etc) to its' logical conclusion. It's ridiculous and he's harming his own credibility, but I see the angle. Imo the only reason there could be for us to 'normalize' paedophilia is if we had a treatment, if we could line them up at a clinic and give them a psychiatric drug that would rectify their attraction. So we wouldn't be taking them out of the shadows to accept them and make them a legitimate part of society, we would be taking them out of the shadows to encourage them to take this treatment and become normal so that they wouldn't offend.
 
Renard said:
For the get-go you need to know the difference between paedophile = attraction to children vs child molester = sexual action towards children, regardless of the motivation e.g. power/control or attraction. Cantor's research shows that there are important physiological differences in the brain structures of paedophiles as seen on brain scans. Compared to the general population, paedophiles are also significantly shorter, their IQ is one standard deviation lower and they're much more likely to be left-handed (30% vs 8% of the general population). These are manifestations of differences in the organization of their brain, which likely arose during foetal brain development for reasons yet undiscovered.

So for people not familiar with his research, this is really out of left field. But he's basically taking this idea (born, not a choice, etc) to its' logical conclusion. It's ridiculous and he's harming his own credibility, but I see the angle. Imo the only reason there could be for us to 'normalize' paedophilia is if we had a treatment, if we could line them up at a clinic and give them a psychiatric drug that would rectify their attraction. So we wouldn't be taking them out of the shadows to accept them and make them a legitimate part of society, we would be taking them out of the shadows to encourage them to take this treatment and become normal so that they wouldn't offend.
Click to expand...

Taking them out of the shadows for treatment is probably the best thing we can do if the goal is to ensure that less kids are molested or raped by them. The degree to which these people are shamed by society and shunned is probably the most important factor in keeping them sick.

I realize that there is therapy available for them but therapy alone is often not enough. I have often thought that the survival of molestation from generation to generation is possible only because of the wall of shame and secrecy that the whole phenomenon is treated with.

However any attempt at normalization cannot be tolerated-- not even a little bit. The fact that these mostly men are meeting online in secret chat rooms and bolstering one another and talking about their attraction in seemingly flippant ways is not in any way the solution but it is the likely outcome since they can often find no love or solace with family and friends.

Families of people with this mental illness probably need to be educated and equipped and receive some kind of formal training on how to navigate being in relationship with a pedophile.

Most people cannot hold two seeming contraries in their mind and heart at once. They will either be disgusted or compassionate but in the case of pedophilia a person needs to be able to hold both of these at once. A loss of either one would be to lose focus and not be useful to the person anymore.

Zero tolerance for any thoughts that move towards action, zero tolerance for engaging willingly in thoughts of pedophilia (even when the intention is just fantasizing and no action is intended) combined with acceptance and love for the person willing to heal and change is the only way we will ever eradicate this-- barring some miracle medical procedure.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Blows my mind how people can be in denial about the push for normalization that's occurring.

 
The only thing we should be understanding about fucking pedophiles is how to keep them so afraid and ashamed that they will not even think of molesting a child. Child molesters should be immediately destroyed and sent to hell. This perversion needs to be eradicated with extreme prejudice.

giphy.gif
 
BearGrounds said:
Blows my mind how people can be in denial about the push for normalization that's occurring.

Click to expand...



What about this video does anything to normalize pedophilia? This is entirely directed towards ensuring that less incidents happen? How did you come to this conclusion?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Devout Pessimist said:
The only thing we should be understanding about fucking pedophiles is how to keep them so afraid and ashamed that they will not even think of molesting a child. Child molesters should be immediately destroyed and sent to hell. This perversion needs to be eradicated with extreme prejudice.

giphy.gif
Click to expand...


The problem is the very sentiment you shared here is what breeds the isolation that allows for more incidents to occur. I know it is terrible but a person who is alone and cannot share these feelings with someone (in a way that is meant to avoid contact) is more likely to engage in a detestable act.
 
franklinstower said:
What about this video does anything to normalizing pedophilia? This is entirely directed towards ensuring that less incidents happen? How did you come to this conclusion?
Click to expand...

It is entirely geared towards generating sympathy for these people and shifting the blame for child sexual abuse on the populace for out-casting them. That's how they begin with the disarming of the stigmatization.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,074
Messages
55,465,952
Members
174,785
Latest member
JoyceOuthw

Share this page

Back
Top