THIS article highlights the fact thatthe amount of man-made CO2 in theatmosphere is severely limited. Wealso point to simple observationsthat show how small the blockingeffect of CO2 actually is. Why man-made emissions make no difference each year, we burn coal, gas and oil thatall contribute to the total CO2 in theatmosphere. A simple-minded conclusion might be that in 100 years, humans could double the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. But, however, there is a catch. Studies show that, during each year, about one-fifth of the CO2 in the atmosphere is exchanged with the oceans, plants and other sources. This exchange will include any man-made CO2 that is present in the atmosphere.
In other words, the man-made component of CO2 in the atmosphere becomes less significant when the exchange takes place.The assumption is that all man-made CO2 goes straight into the atmosphere and stays there. However, we release most of our CO2 close to the surface of the Earth, where plants and the oceans will immediately absorb some of it, leaving even less to mix with the air. Measurements by Kenneth Skrable,George Chabot and Clayton French (2022) found that just 12 per cent of atmospheric CO2 was man-made.
And because of the CO2 exchange between atmosphere and oceans, itis unlikely that this figure will change significantly in the short term, because the oceans can hold about 50 times more CO2 than the atmosphere.
The increased concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere is caused primarily by the warming of the oceans. Suggestions that man-made emissions might directly cause a doubling of atmospheric CO2 are a physical impossibility and so have zero credibility. The climate scam is scheduled to cost 5 per cent of GDP (about £15bn) – your taxes for years to come – and includes severe restrictions and controls to be placed on the population. Remember, the controls are only for you and I, not for the super-grifters and their organisations ranging from the World Economic Forum to local councils – all of whom are working to run the western world into oblivion, with the intention for it to be resurrected as a totalitarian hell for most of us and debauched luxury for the few.
To achieve world government, it has been argued that it would be necessary to remove from the minds of the population their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism, and religious beliefs. We can see this scenario playing out in our schools, our universities, our councils, our judiciary, our governments, our churches, and across corporations.
We are in an existential war for the future of humanity. We have not voted for what is happening in schools and wider society. The tyranny of the minority is being implemented and upheld in this country by vaguely-worded parliamentary legislation voted into law by complicitor uncomprehending parliamentarians, who have abandoned their commitment to their oath of office and to serve the public’s best interests. Co2: A very thin blanket An example of how small the blanketing effect of carbon dioxide actually is can be observed in deserts. Such areas often have periods of extremely low humidity with almost no water vapour present above them. On these occasions, temperatures can be very warm in the daytime, but fall very rapidly to well below zero at night. This happens because carbon dioxide, together with other trace gases, cannot block the loss of heat from the ground over their narrow wavelength ranges. When humidity is higher, the nights insuch places are much warmer, because water vapour blocks the loss of heat overa much wider range of wavelengths. In the UK, for the same reason, clear skies at night in winter often signal frost. Yet the meagre blanketing effect of the less than 5 per cent contribution of atmospheric man-made carbon dioxide is cited as THE cause of climatechange/global warming, and is driving the most far-reaching and eye-watering expenditures on an international scale.The only benefit is to those who already have an abundance of wealth, whereas the burden of complying with, and paying for, the destructive programmes is placed on those who can least afford to fund them.These programmes are fraudulent, aimed at destroying societies, impoverishing populations worldwide and eventually consolidating everything into a worldwide, digital, totalitarian system of government. Consequences The Climate Scam is going to cost atleast $150 billion – this money does not just disappear; it ends up in the bankaccounts of those who can afford to invest in those industries prospering from the edicts dreamed up to mitigate the fictitious climate crisis. The controls are only for the little people, not for the super-rich and their hangers on from the WEF, WHO, UN, EU, The City of London, the Universities and even officials in your local town hall, all ofwhom are working to run the western world into oblivion, most with little understanding of the destruction that they are blindly and dutifully helping to inflict upon us.
www.theguardian.com
