Originally posted by cptn.fuktard
what he was saying in the 1st part was that christianity branched out of judahism.
Sorry fuktard he is saying way more than that and you people are taking this simplistic drivel to the bank.
Hell with it I am gonna jump the gun rather than wait for his reply.
Tenacious T: Buddy your sweeping generalisations are killing me. The level of inacurracy and downright falsehood is really stupendous. I guess because your write big paragraphs people don't have time to check up on what you say but since I am unemployed till July 29 I do.
The inconsistencies in the Bible are only Minor according to you, fuktard and company. You folks declaim this as if it has passed your INFORMED scrutiny and everyone shares your already verified view. Don't think so. In fact people who actually know something of the Bible find these inconsistencies rather MAJOR and worthy of serious and ongoing debate.
The link(which it seems none of you checked being so well informed) I posted before should give you a glimpse on how unresolved this issue actually is with views for and against.
http://www.bib-arch.org/bswbBreakingIllSpecial1.html
About Confucius: Considered more of a PHILOSOPHER than a RELIGIOUS figure. Some argue his system of morals and ethics formed a state religion but this is a fringe interpretation. Put confucianism in your browser and compare the definitions you get.
Your absolute declaration regarding Abrahamic religions and complex philosophies: You base this on what? What are your criteria? Because Buddhism, etc... do not seem have an explicit dichotomy between good and evil they are therefore not complex? Lacking developpement on this issue? What? Please explain.
Aristotle,Voltaire etc... You are telling me these guy's intellectual cogitations were really fondamentally devoted to expanding on the Bible and competing with Jesus? And, as YOU claim, they have added nothing really significant? You are hard to please! Explain more I beg thee.
Bottom line: Stop making these sweeping comments without nuances and putting forth personal impressions as being well accepted knowledge. I notice some people taking your stuff at face value and being impressed with your name dropping when in fact you are not even putting forth straight facts. You guys are misusing fact to support your faith arguments. You can't have it both ways. Either completely abandon the real world and stick to metaphysics or put forth your facts accurately.