Do you appreciate WMMA?

[Fuzzybabyducks]

We've seen 0 one punch KO's in the UFC, 2 legitimate KO's total, and barely a handful of TKO's.

u are just making crap up TBH.. either trolling or you dont watch the fights..
JJ vs claudia was the best fight of UFC weekend and also

and thats from a submission fighter

 

[Fuzzybabyducks]

I stand corrected. 1 one punch KO. But the knockouts and tko's are still laughably rare for as many women fights as we've had.

you have been corrected many times in this thread

 

[Coolidge]

u are just making crap up TBH.. either trolling or you dont watch the fights..
JJ vs claudia was the best fight of UFC weekend and also

and thats from a submission fighter

Try reading the thread.

I stand corrected. 1 one punch KO. But the knockouts and tko's are still laughably rare for as many women fights as we've had.

1 example isn't exactly amazing.

 

[Coolidge]

you have been corrected many times in this thread

In your imagination.

 

[Fuzzybabyducks]

Try reading the thread.



1 example isn't exactly amazing.

u should try reading the thread, you are making yourself look bad... everything you have posted has been countered and now you are just making up stuff to back up your senseless postings

 

[Coolidge]

u should try reading the thread, you are making yourself look bad... everything you have posted has been countered and now you are just making up stuff to back up your senseless postings

You're too stupid to distinguish me from 'bad_k', it seems.

 

[FimbulFightPicks]

No I didn't deny that, do you have any idea what was being said?

My original statement was "Why watch WMMA when it's the less athletic and less powerful version of MMA". This girl responded to me by saying why would I watch lightweight fights when Heavyweight can beat them? My answer to that was then what you quoted me on, the lighter fighters would lose to the heavyweights but in return they offer more fast faced dynamic fights.

I never said a thing about faster fighters being able to beat heavier stronger fighters, I simply offered the merits to why these fighters are more exciting to watch in their own ways.

I did only see your post and the one you had qouted I think. Not the originals back then no I see now. Alright I can agree with you there, definitely more fast paced and dymanic. So my apologies for debating you on something wrong, that was taken out of context and i should had looked further into it before judging and writing. My sincere apologies.

 

[bad_k]

I did only see your post and the one you had qouted I think. Not the originals back then no I see now. Alright I can agree with you there, definitely more fast paced and dymanic. So my apologies for debating you on something wrong, that was taken out of context and i should had looked further into it before judging and writing. My sincere apologies.

No problem brother, we are on the same page now.

 

[bad_k]

You're too stupid to distinguish me from 'bad_k', it seems.

I literally just converted someone who was disagreeing with me to someone who agrees with me.

Don't put my name in the same sentence as you.

 

[Fuzzybabyducks]

Comparing it to the men's division is the equivalent of saying the lightweight division sucks because heavyweights would maul them. They're different divisions, they are split up for a reason. What matters is relativity. The women's 135 can be exciting without needing to be better athletically than the men's 135, for the same reason flyweight can be great even if Nick Diaz probably took their lunch money in school. By your argument, you would only watch heavyweight or light heavyweight because they represent the biggest and baddest gorillas in the jungle.

If you can watch multiple men's divisions and respect the weight class separations, then you can watch the women and respect the sex separations without complaining that the men are more athletic or more powerful. What makes the UFC great is finding out who the best in the world are in their respective divisions. It's about relativity. Yes, maybe joe-blow unranked bellator fighter can dominate a highly-respected female fighter. Who cares? Who cares any more than saying Cain can kill Mighty Mouse? All I care about is how good are you respective to your peers. Joanna vs. Claudia II was outstanding and full of tension, because you knew you were watching the two best in the division going at it, both trying to impose polar opposite gameplans. If you follow the division like any other division and come to know the fighters, it can be just as enjoyable as the other divisions.

Women are half the population in the world. If you're not excited to know who the best in the world are for half the population on Earth, then you're selling yourself short of some great fights, narratives, personalities and expressions of technical abilities.

the poll results and this post basically /thread

 

[LATEXXX COMMANDO]

Do I appreciate it? Yes.

Do I particularly enjoy it? Not really.

There are some fights that are tremendous but a lot of them are also really bad.

 

[Coolidge]

I literally just converted someone who was disagreeing with me to someone who agrees with me.

Don't put my name in the same sentence as you.

Lol. You two are both slow. He was referring to your exchange with 'SnitchInsider' and others.

 

[bad_k]

Lol. You two are both slow. He was referring to your exchange with 'SnitchInsider' and others.

You are as dumb and ugly as that girl in your avatar.

 

[Coolidge]

You are as dumb and ugly as that girl in your avatar.

Lashing out at me isn't going to save you from your gaffe.

 

[Coolidge]

u are just making crap up TBH.. either trolling or you dont watch the fights..
JJ vs claudia was the best fight of UFC weekend and also

and thats from a submission fighter

And no, Joana vs Claudia wasn't the best fight of the weekend. The Smolka fight was much better. A lot more activity and much better skills on display.

 

[Jin Akutsu]

Do I appreciate it? Yes.

Do I particularly enjoy it? Not really.

There are some fights that are tremendous but a lot of them are also really bad.

I feel similarly.

 

[bad_k]

Lashing out at me isn't going to save you from your gaffe.

I literally converted someone who opposed my opinion to someone who agrees with me.

Meanwhile not a single person has any idea what you are blabbering about.

 

[DanaWhitesButler]

WMMA is awful.

You are awful

 

[Coolidge]

I literally converted someone who opposed my opinion to someone who agrees with me.

Meanwhile not a single person has any idea what you are blabbering about.

The arguments that you made in favor of your position were incredibly asinine, and I say that as someone who's highly critical of the women's divisions.

 

[bad_k]

The arguments that you made in favor of your position were incredibly asinine, and I say that as someone who's highly critical of the women's divisions.

Explain yourself how it was asinine and not just you blabbering again.