I actually like Gustafssons fighting though hes not nearly as extraordinary as the former champ.Don't get me wrong, I love watching Jones fight and I thought he was the best fighter ever, but when you Jones nuthuggers keep trashing Gus you'll get the same treatment as well.
I agree with both decisions.Both razor close fights. In those two fights i think the champion got it because of one moment in the fight : the elbow of jones and the flurry of Lawler in the last round.
Do you think the champs have not been beaten decisively ? Or do you think it was enough for the challengers to get the belt ?
Personnally, i think the decisions were right. You go sherdog
I actually like Gustafssons fighting though hes not nearly as extraordinary as the former champ.
I dont see how stating Gus record or losses constitutes trashing him.
Well if you read you're own comments and other fellow Jones nuthuggers and change Gustafson's name to another fighter, it should put some perspective on it I guess.
If I said, "If its any consolation Rory would have immediately lost the belt to Lawler or Hendricks"
That simply doesnt equate to "bashing"
Its a logical assesment based on fight records.
I think you are a "hugger" , as u say , since it seems your emotions have clouded your assesment of Gus actual performance.
No, I'm a big fan of Gus, but I can still stay objective unlike you.
I've read multiple of you're posts in different threads about Gus, and it's usually just bullshit.
"logical assessment based on fight records". Is that what you say when you posts that he has never beaten a top 10 fighter (when he clearly beat Shogun?). Yeah, exactly.
Calm down buckaroo, your getting unnecessarily emotional.
If Shogun was top 10 when Gus beat him, I stand corrected. However stating his record and actual performance is not "thrashing" him regardless of how uneasy it makes you personally feel as a fan of his
yesBoth razor close fights. In those two fights i think the champion got it because of one moment in the fight : the elbow of jones and the flurry of Lawler in the last round.
Do you think the champs have not been beaten decisively ? Or do you think it was enough for the challengers to get the belt ?
Personnally, i think the decisions were right. You go sherdog
Rule number one, don't post about stuff you don't have a freaking clue about, especially when you refer to "logical assessment based on fight records".
Painful man, just painful.
Lol.
Wrong.
If Gus somehow actually defeated Jones-
He would have immediately lost the belt to the number 1 or 2 contenders
Rumble or Cormier as he ACTUALLY lost to them following the Jones fight
"logical assessment based on fight records"
His decision victory over Shogun has zero bearing on that assesment based on fight record.