D
Deleted member 457759
Guest
Yes, 100%
But Don Lemon isn't a hack or a liar. You're just throwing out such ugly attacks because he's to your left, no?
I challenge you to watch the next one of each guy's show and then report back. You won't see any lies or hackishness from Lemon, and you will see many from Hannity.
This is some serious trolling. LOL.
Yes, 100%
While i can't disagree with the first part...
This shit sums it up though.
TrUmP HaS SmAlL HaNdS aNd iS a DuMbHeAd dERp
For not being a hack and boldly claim that:Again, that is an absurd, ugly, dishonest characterization of Lemon.
But more than that, Lemon leans a little left but has open discussions and isn't a political hack. Hannity doesn't even really have an ideology and just blindly defends his party. Even the Coulter said that if Trump decided to embrace communism, Hannity would go along with it.
So that is Lemon's view and in light of that:Don Lemon - When you lie about anything, you'll lie about everything and there is apparently nothing that is too small or too insignificant for this President to lie about.
For not being a hack and boldly claim that:
So that is Lemon's view and in light of that:
He repeatedly invites James Clapper to analyse the news, Clapper who repeatedly lied under oath to the Senate Intelligence Committee concerning the National Security Agency’s surveillance program.
If Lemon isn't a hack, why doesn't he assume that Clapper is lying to him since if you "lie about anything, you lie about everything"?
The Hill shows a much more reasonable stance towards Clapper:
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...ctions-sure-look-like-political-manipulations
His small hands are still bigger than your small mind... So there is that also.He has a micro-dick.
And yes, his handz are tiny.
Anyway, if you support him, then...........................
It's normal for the War Room, so there is that....
No, I don't need to compare Lemon to Hannity to acknowledge that he is a hack. His "hackiness" stands on its own, especially since he doesn't confront Clapper about lying under oath etc.So your argument is that Lemon is a Hannity-type hack because he has James Clapper, a highly respected foreign-policy expert, on his show to provide analysis and isn't disrespectful to him?
Not is you’re a black pastor unwilling to tow the line...
Notice how they introduced him very respectfully, but when he didn’t tow the line, he magically became a “controversial pastor”...
Further details below.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnns-...ump-during-interview-journalistic-malpractice
No, I don't need to compare Lemon to Hannity to acknowledge that he is a hack. His "hackiness" stands on its own, especially since he doesn't confront Clapper about lying under oath etc.
I would like to see the Don Lemon white knights address this.
There is another egregious example I'm gonna post when I get to my desktop
Quoting someone I ignore, but if you're going to call me names for asking you to clarify your position, you can just fuck off anyway.
What the hell?!? What name did I call you?
Meanwhile they also don't know the difference between entertainment opinion news and investigative journalism, so their opinions aren't informed enough to have any gravity.
I've seen his show a few times, and it's lightweight, inoffensive stuff. He seems like a good guy. Then I see you and others expressing incredibly ugly sentiments about him, and I just ask why, and you refer to me as a white knight for him? It seems like pure hatred of the left has totally warped you guys' minds.
This is clearly a big part of the problem (and how Hannity and Lemon, who are irrelevant to a discussion about the news, even came up). In other threads, people have indicated that they not only can't distinguish between talk shows and news programming, but they can't distinguish between staff and guests. I've seen posts like, "(network) said (something a guest said)." Such comments are always made in a biased way (specifically, confirmation bias). No one fills in the gap with "CNN said (something Jeff Lord said)."