Did CM Punk's UFC run make Brock's look better?

I feel that you have never heard the saying about apples and oranges
 
I hate Brock Lesnar but he has more athletic ability in one of his fingers than cm punk has in his whole body.
 
Cmon clippy.

Brock was a wrestler who wrassled. Cm punk was just a wrassler.

There’s a difference and you know it. Can’t compare em
 
You don’t remember his war with the photographer and his stellar submission defence against that biter Micky Gall?

Punk’s almost Interchangeable with Alec Baldwin in that sense, interestingly enough.
 
No - they don't have the same background.
 
Well I still think Brock doesn't often get his due credit on this forum, not sure if anyone will ever win the UFC title while being such an MMA novice. He also took on anyone, no ducking for Brawk.
 
Brock's first run wasn't bad. He beat some names but his limited skillset eventually caught up with im.

Retired Herring (pretty sure that was Herring's last match after he shattered his orbital with that first punch), lost to Mir which he avenged later on and beat Randy.

Sure he's got the losses to Cain and Overeem that people talk about but his run wasn't terrible and stands on its own. Doesn't need CM Punk to make him look better
 
Brock was an elite folkstyle wrestler.

CM Punk was never an athlete nor a martial artist untill his old age.

Brock is a freak athlete who was juiced to the gills.

CM Punk was a normal guy who was not on steroids.

No offense to CM Punk but it is strange how he actually thought he was good. I think he even said he was considering making a run for the title and I think he was serious.
 
Wow @Clippy doesn't like Brock huh. :D

Dude had one heck of a schedule and went up vs top guys one after another and he did so well considering the learning curve and the opponents.

He won, unified and defended the HW belt when others still learn the sport on the regional circuit. Imagine if CM Punk went up vs the top 5's in WW and even won the belt how crazy would that be.
 
I think it should be taken into consideration CM Punk is like one of the least athletic guys compared to even most guys in the WWE. If he wasn't so good on the mic (by WWE standards at least) he wouldn't have even been that successful in pro wrestling.

Quite a few guys from the WWE as far as I can recall were scouted from the college wrestling scene and other athletic backgrounds.
 
Brock Lesnar is a freak of nature from psycho Viking stock.

CM Punk is from the stock of bog people Vikings killed.
2c3966abe94971de1e3cb3b1601fdcbc.gif
Quite possibly the most appropriate statement that could be made regarding the two.
 
Fact: Brock has the highest quality of opposition ever.

9 fights----Mir 2x, Herring, Couture, Cain, Carwin, Ubereem, Hunt, and a scrub for his debut.
 
Fact: Brock has the highest quality of opposition ever.

9 fights----Mir 2x, Herring, Couture, Cain, Carwin, Ubereem, Hunt, and a scrub for his debut.
This compared to Gall and the other guy with a name I can't remember.
 
...and the forum ignoramuses always claim that Brock's success was due to PEDs only - well it turned out that Mir, Carwin and Overeem were also "on something".
 
Back
Top